RIP Range Rationalisation
Background
Range rationalisation for the supermarket industry has the goal of maximising sales whilst reducing CODB (cost of doing business). To minimise the CODB the number of SKUs sold is decreased. Normally only top selling SKUs, that hit a ‘hurdle rate’ of X UPSPW (units per store per week) are kept. This approach should then maximise profit for both manufacturer and supermarket.
This quick blog highlights that range rationalisation does not always maximise profit in the long-term. Retailers that have grown recently, including hard discounters and marketplaces, have up-ranged. Increasing shopper power, including the demand for personalisation, will continue the need to up-range. To maximise long-term financial results manufacturers and supermarkets should focus on meeting shopper demands, not range rationalisation.
Hard Discounters
Some would suggest that full-service supermarkets, such as Woolworths Australia, adopted range rationalisation due to the success of hard discounters, such as Aldi. Generally speaking, Aldi Australia ranges substantially less SKUs (2,000 per store) vs Woolworths (20,000 per store). Even with this reduced SKU count Aldi has been able to establish and grow their business in Australia to approx. 12.4% share (Roy Morgan, Looking beyond the panic-buying, Australia’s big supermarket story is Aldi’s growing market share, March 2020) in 2019. So, do Australian shoppers prefer stores will less SKUs?
Independent research highlights that shoppers’ have been switching to hard discounters due to changes in their offer. Hard discounters have:
For example, as explained by Xan Rice (The Aldi Effect: how one discount supermarket transformed the way Britain shops, The Guardian, 2019) Aldi Britain developed their 1990’s offer from 600 basic items to nearly 2,000 SKUs. Aldi Britain has improved the quality of the range and even range ’36-day aged Scottish Aberdeen Angus sirloin steak’.
‘Aldi’s victory was to show there was no shame – and in fact there was satisfaction – in shopping at a discount supermarket’.
Xan Rice (The Aldi Effect: how one discount supermarket transformed the way Britain shops, The Guardian, 2019)
So, sales growth for hard discounters has, in part, been due to increased ranging (up-ranging), not range rationalisation.
Amazon / marketplaces
Marketplaces, such as Amazon, have also achieved sales growth (off a very small base) during the last 20 years. Included in Amazons’ Q1 21 results was that Amazon had ‘200 million paid Prime members worldwide’ and ‘Net sales increased 44% to $108.5 billion in the first quarter’. According to Scrapehero Amazon sells over 100 million SKUs (in a variety of categories) around the world.
So, sales growth for marketplaces, such as Amazon, is due in part to a large range, not range rationalisation.
Shopper Power
The concept of ‘the shopper is king’ is not new. What has changed is that technology and the internet has increased shopper power. Shoppers and consumers are demanding more than ever. Another way of expressing this change is that the power has moved from the manufacturer / supermarket to the shopper and consumer.?
领英推荐
An example of how technology has changed how shoppers behave is the increasing use of mobile phones. For example “nearly 60% of shoppers look up production information and prices while using their mobile phones in stores” (Retail Dive How shoppers use their smartphones in stores, 2017).
As outlined by Jim Blasingame, in his book The Age of the Customer, customers now control the relationship with sellers and they also control the product information. This change has also increased the power of shoppers. The success of manufacturers and supermarkets could now be determined by online reviews that are written by shoppers and consumers. According to a Deloitte study (The Deloitte Consumer Review, The growing power of consumers, 2014) 81% of people read online reviews and check customer ratings during the buying process.?
Due to the increasing power of shoppers many manufacturers and supermarkets are now adopting a customer centric strategy. As explained by KPMG this approach should maximise financial results.
‘These customer obsessed organizations see customer experience as a source of commercial value: not just a differentiator versus competition (although it certainly is that) but a mechanism for superior profitability. The net result? Customer obsession results in a sustainable source of financial value for shareholders and owners.’
KPMG: Customer first. Customer obsessed. Global Customer Experience Excellence Report, 2019.
This change in thinking has led some retailers to up-range. For example, Woolworths Australia, announced in May 2018 plans to increase SKU count by 30% to 60 – 70,000 SKUs (AFR, Woolworths shifts focus to convenience and range as Amazon threatens, May 2018) . This up-ranging was to ensure Woolworths could meet local demand.
Personalisation
For the supermarket industry personalisation is when manufacturers and supermarkets tailor the shopping experience, including the products offered, to the shoppers’ individual requirements.
One aspect of increased shopper power is the demand for personalisation. IGD research suggests that the retail store of the future will be:
‘a shopper’s personal micro store offering individualised and online-exclusive products, personalised promotions, recommendations, advertising and loyalty schemes.’
IGD, Three key global markets to see – 212% combined online growth over the next five years, 2018
To meet shopper demands for personalisation manufacturers and supermarkets will need to up-range. Product ranges will move from top sellers to personalised ranges. For example, in some supermarkets, shoppers can order a cake with personalised decorations. It is predicted that more personalised products shall be offered in the future. Some suggest new technology, such as 3D printing in food, will enable manufacturers and supermarkets to offer more personalised ranges.
Summation
Range rationalisation focused on maximising manufacturers and supermarkets profits. This was achieved by removing costs. In the short term the financial results may have been positive. In the long-term manufacturers and supermarkets that have focused on meeting shopper demands have maximised their long-term financial results. To meet shopper demands, including personalisation, will require manufacturers and supermarkets to up-range and tailor how products / experiences are delivered to meet shopper demands.??
Retail & Consumer Consultant
3 年Shopping at Coles/Woolies takes way too long. Woolies might have 6 brands of apricot jam in 4 sizes. 24 SKUs. Multiply that across the range and it becomes a hunting expedition & a lot of your daily 10,000 steps! Their sales analysis & SKU performance reporting means continued replenishment based on history (provided a minimum sales goal is met). This is flawed and a great weakness of most huge retail reporting systems. Inventory management is based on what you sold, NOT what you didn’t sell because for example the customer couldn’t find his product (or your available inventory at Kmart when shopping for work boots, they only stock size 12s ??). ALDI seems to start with the customer. What do they want? “how many apricot jams does a customer need to see, so he buys one?” ALDI has one apricot jam (maybe an extra premium extra fruit option might be good ??). Imagine the savings ALDI makes at every step: better buying discounts, less space, less rent, less product management in the back end & more. ALDI doesn’t delete or move products around as much either. The prices are ok, the special buys too. I would argue a key customer benefit at ALDI is the time saved… thoughts?
Managing Director & Co-Founder at Asembl Brands
3 年Justin Nikolovski Jessica Marr
Director Dalmhill Enterprises Pty Ltd
3 年Gee, what a surprise….
Marketing Manager | Brand Builder | Laughing enthusiast
3 年Patricia John