Right to Switch off

Right to Switch off

Summary: Government considering increases in tribunal compensation where ‘right to switch off’ has been breached.

Labour made a manifesto pledge to “bring in the ‘right to switch off’” in their wide-ranging ‘Make Work Pay’ paper. The Times newspaper reported over the weekend that the government is now looking at how such a right will operate in practice.

The article outlines that the government is considering an approach whereby a Code of Practice on the right to switch off is introduced (probably by Acas). Failure to follow this code would not provide a free-standing right to bring a claim in the employment tribunal. However, any failure to follow it could be taken into account as an aggravating factor when deciding the level of compensation to be awarded in other tribunal claims.

It sounds like the government is looking to give the proposed code of practice on the right to switch off a similar status to the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Matters. A failure to follow this can result in the amount of compensation awarded being increased by up to 25%.

We are still light on detail here and the proposed approach poses several questions. What, exactly, will this code of practice mandate? What level of uplift might apply? What claims will it apply to?

It is also not yet clear whether the focus of the uplift will be breaches of the proposed code of practice or of any internal policy put in place by the employer in light of it. The Times reports that the penalty would apply “if companies are shown to repeatedly breach agreements on?out-of-hours working”. This sounds like the penalty will look past the code of practice and look at compliance with any flowing internal workplace agreement. This approach would be more interventionist than the current position on disciplinary and grievance matters.

The government source quoted in the Times makes it clear that the government has?“not settled on a position yet”.



要查看或添加评论,请登录

Daniel Barnett的更多文章

  • Compensation

    Compensation

    Summary: Tribunal erred in reducing discrimination compensation by 80% based on the chance that the Claimant might have…

    1 条评论
  • ERB: Zero hours contracts

    ERB: Zero hours contracts

    Summary: Government to amend Employment Rights Bill to include framework for application of zero hours contracts…

    5 条评论
  • Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Summary: Dismissal based on a genuine but erroneous belief that the Claimant had resigned should have been considered…

    1 条评论
  • Employment Tribunals

    Employment Tribunals

    Summary: New ET rules of procedure in force from 6 January 2025 From 6 January 2025, employment law practitioners will…

    3 条评论
  • Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Summary: Length of service and alternatives to dismissal not relevant factors where dismissal was due to irretrievable…

    2 条评论
  • Holiday Pay

    Holiday Pay

    Summary: Gap of over three months between deductions did not break chain in holiday pay claim In Deksne v Ambitions…

  • Maternity Protection

    Maternity Protection

    Summary: Suitable Alternative Employment In Hunter v Carnival plc the Employment Appeal Tribunal looked at the…

    2 条评论
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal

    Employment Appeal Tribunal

    Summary: EAT issues new Practice Direction to accompany new Rules The Employment Appeal Tribunal has published a new…

  • Whistleblowing detriment

    Whistleblowing detriment

    Summary: Disclosures made before employment begins can qualify as protected In MacLennan v British Psychological…

    1 条评论
  • Employment Rights Bill: consultation on remedies for collective redundancy and fire and rehire

    Employment Rights Bill: consultation on remedies for collective redundancy and fire and rehire

    Summary: Government launches consultation seeking views on strengthening remedies against abuse of rules on collective…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了