Right-Sided Story: Anatomical Contrasts Between Porcine and Human Heart

Using pigs in cardiovascular research seems straightforward—until you realize their right heart is more of a quirky cousin than a close relative of its human counterpart. The porcine right atrium is compact, its venous inflows meet at a right angle, and the notorious moderator band is an entanglement hazard for devices. These differences can turn even the best-laid experimental plans into unexpected challenges.

Right Angles, Wrong Expectations

One of the most striking anatomical differences between the porcine and human right atrium is the angle at which the superior vena cava (SVC) and inferior vena cava (IVC) meet the right atrium. In humans, these veins align almost directly, offering a straightforward pathway for blood flow and device delivery. In pigs, however, the SVC and IVC converge at a right angle, creating a unique hemodynamic pattern that can affect catheter navigation and procedural success.

Size Matters: The Right Atrium in Pigs vs. Humans

The right atrium in pigs is notably smaller in height and volume than its human counterpart, particularly when considering human patients with cardiovascular disease, where chamber dilation is common. This means that catheters and devices designed with human chamber proportions in mind might encounter unexpected spatial constraints in pigs. What feels like a snug fit in an experimental pig heart could be an entirely different scenario in a human patient.

The Moderator Band: A Snare Waiting to Happen

Another feature that often surprises researchers and interventionists is the prominent muscular moderator band in the porcine right ventricle. This structure, located much higher in the ventricle than in humans, has been the source of more than a few entanglements during device testing. It’s an important reminder that while the pig heart is a valuable surrogate, anatomical nuances can introduce unexpected technical challenges.

Pulmonary Valve & Tricuspid Valve: A Weighty Correlation

Size correlations between the pulmonary and tricuspid valves and overall body weight are moderately strong in pigs. This makes weight an important factor when selecting an animal model for device testing. However, a one-size-fits-all approach based on weight alone won’t guarantee a perfect match for human-scale devices. Valve dimensions in pigs may not scale proportionally to body weight as predictably as one might hope.

Flexibility vs. Function: A Moving Target

Unlike their left-sided counterparts, the structures of the right heart are highly pliable and dynamic. Right atrial and ventricular dimensions fluctuate significantly based on volume status and even positional changes of the animal (prone, supine, lateral). This means that what looks like a perfectly sized structure under one condition may shift dramatically when the animal moves or when its hemodynamic state changes. Additionally, CT analysis of the porcine right atrial and tricuspid structures is made challenging by the fact that the mixing of contrast agent-rich and contrastless blood is often incomplete at this level, potentially requiring specialized injection protocols to improve imaging accuracy.

What Does This Mean for Preclinical Testing?

Understanding these anatomical differences is critical for anyone developing cardiovascular devices. A catheter that glides seamlessly through a human right atrium might find itself awkwardly repositioned due to a pig’s caval angle. A device designed for smooth ventricular navigation in humans might snag on the porcine moderator band. And an assumed valve size based on weight alone might not be the best predictor of fit.

So, the next time you're planning a preclinical study in pigs, remember: The right heart may be the right place to look for unexpected surprises. The better we understand these quirks, the better we can translate preclinical findings into successful human applications.

References:

Crick, S.J., Sheppard, M.N., Ho, S.Y., Gebstein, L., & Anderson, R.H. (1998). Anatomy of the pig heart: Comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. Journal of Anatomy, 193(1), 105-119.

Lipiski, M., Eberhard, M., Fleischmann, T., et al. (2020). Computed Tomography-based evaluation of porcine cardiac dimensions to assist in pre-study planning and optimized model selection for pre-clinical research. Scientific Reports, 10, 6020.

Have you encountered challenges with porcine models in your cardiovascular research? Let’s discuss! #PreclinicalResearch #CardiovascularScience #AnimalModels #RightHeart #MedicalDevices