Rewriting the Zombies: What's a Zombie Rule?

Rewriting the Zombies: What's a Zombie Rule?

Decorative image
What’s a Zombie Rule?

  • Don't split an infinitive.
  • Never end a sentence with a preposition.
  • Don't use double negatives. —Your favorite English teacher

Most of us are familiar with the above grammar rules and many more besides. They're presented to us as hard-and-fast, dyed-in-the-wool rules. Many of them start with don't and are meant to guide you toward "correct" English.

The problem is that they're not grammar rules at all. They're stylistic rules disguised as grammar rules—and not all of them have a good style.

Defining Zombie Rules

In 2005, Arnold Zwicky introduced the term?zombie rule?to describe a grammar rule that isn't really a rule. Zombie rules are taught, followed, and passed along as rules we must follow to speak and write correctly.

Like their namesakes, however, these rules are dead and no matter how many times it's explained that there is no grammatical basis for them, they just keep coming back.

Zombie Creator: Teachers

How do we get such rules? Sometimes well-meaning people, such as our beloved elementary school teachers, pass along a narrow grammar rule or a stylistic guideline as a broad rule and ruthlessly enforce it. Our moldable young minds form around this rule and fix it forever.

Zombie Creator: Language "Improvers"

Other times, people want to "improve" English and force a rule upon the language. Eighteenth-century grammarians had a big case of "English is rubbish unless it looks like Latin" and created plenty of rules for English. Those rules got repeated, generation after generation, with little thought to the reasoning or source. Then our beloved elementary school teachers picked them up, and, well, you can see where that got us.

The improvements generally limit the way we naturally use English, forcing us into an unnecessary and awkward straitjacket.

Zombie Creator: Writing Stylists

And then you have people who don't understand the difference between grammar and style. With the former, there is a right and wrong. You would not say I are going, after all.

But in the latter, there is no right or wrong, merely preference. If you choose to never write in the passive voice, that's allowable, but it isn't ungrammatical to use the passive voice.

In this new series, I'll review several zombie rules that you might have been unwittingly taught and arm you to kill those zombies for good. Think of it not so much as getting rid of beloved rules but as freeing your writing from unnecessary burdens.

Stay tuned!

A version of this article was originally published on June 10, 2013, in Visual Thesaurus.

Sofia Romero

Sr. MarCom Director, BU Wheelock | Author, "We Have Always Been Who We Are"

1 年

Love this--always battling zombie rules! But how do we get this knowledge to trickle down to the places where these are actually being taught?!

Erin Servais

Instructor and editor teaching editors to upskill using Artificial Intelligence

1 年

Excellent article, Erin! Like lots of editors, I was very much a prescriptivist when I started copyediting. In the years since I've let up my grip, it has been so pleasurable to break the rules from time to time.

Lisa de Caux

Stop your readers getting distracted by wordy niggles?Business books?Fiction?The enthusiasm is palpable

1 年

Great article, Erin – a double negative always reminds me of the film Clue where it leads to ‘proof positive’ ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Erin Brenner的更多文章

  • Usable Usage: Could You Care Less?

    Usable Usage: Could You Care Less?

    A while back, someone asked me the difference between in case of rain and in the event of rain. Were the two…

    5 条评论
  • Avoiding Harm: Copyediting for Conscious Language

    Avoiding Harm: Copyediting for Conscious Language

    The first rule of the Copyeditor’s Typographic Oath is “Do no harm,” but what qualifies as “harm”? Sure, we try to…

    7 条评论
  • When Your Creativity Has Tapped Out

    When Your Creativity Has Tapped Out

    You’ve finally finished—truly finished—writing your book. You wrote and rewrote.

    4 条评论
  • Language by the People

    Language by the People

    In a LinkedIn Group, someone once asked: Which one of the two is the correct usage? “The people that knew about the…

    12 条评论
  • Punctuation Point: Possessing the Apostrophe

    Punctuation Point: Possessing the Apostrophe

    The apostrophe is one of those pieces of punctuation that get a lot of people in trouble. It looks like a comma that…

    9 条评论
  • A Most Important(ly) Lesson

    A Most Important(ly) Lesson

    I have a confession to make: I made a reflexive edit in a manuscript based on personal preference. Worse, I then…

    4 条评论
  • Dash It All

    Dash It All

    Hyphens and em dashes and en dashes, oh my! It's enough to make any writer's head spin. In this post, I'll help you get…

    9 条评论
  • Who vs. Whom and Other Writing Bugaboos

    Who vs. Whom and Other Writing Bugaboos

    Every writer has them: little points of grammar they can never remember. Is it who or whom? When is effect the right…

    21 条评论
  • I'll Take the Percent Increase for $84, Please

    I'll Take the Percent Increase for $84, Please

    Several years ago, when the US government had finally signed a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff, I was quickly confused…

    11 条评论
  • Punctuation Point: Joining Independent Clauses

    Punctuation Point: Joining Independent Clauses

    Recently, someone asked me about joining two independent clauses to make a compound sentence. She thought such a…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了