The Revenue Hunger Games: May the Odds Be Ever in Your Favor
Jonathan Moss
Revenue Executive & Operator | Board GTM & AI advisor | Optimizing GTM operating systems and building AI for Founders & GTM teams | Speaker & Podcast ??? Host | Revenue Architect |
One question puzzles even the most seasoned leaders: Who should own cross-sell, upsell, and renewals? The answer to this question can make or break your company's growth trajectory.
The Revenue Ownership Dilemma
Many companies struggle with deciding whether their sales team or customer success team should be responsible for expanding and retaining customer accounts. This isn't just a theoretical problem – it has real-world implications for some of the biggest names in tech.
Salesforce, for instance, has famously oscillated between different models over the years. They've experimented with having account executives handle the entire customer lifecycle, then switched to a specialized model with separate teams for new business and existing accounts, and have continued to refine their approach.
HubSpot's journey from a sales-led to a product-led growth model necessitated a complete overhaul of its revenue operations. This shift required rethinking not just team structures, but also compensation models and customer engagement strategies.
The stakes are high. According to Gartner, a mere 5% increase in customer retention can boost profits by 25% to 95%. With numbers like these, it's clear that getting your revenue ownership model right is crucial for sustainable growth.
Understanding Specialization in Revenue Ownership
Specialization refers to the practice of dividing responsibilities for different stages of the customer lifecycle among distinct teams or roles. In a specialized model:
1. Sales Development Representatives (SDRs) or Business Development Representatives (BDRs) focus on prospecting and qualifying leads.
2. Account Executives (AEs) concentrate on closing new business.
3. Customer Success Managers (CSMs) or Account Managers (AMs) handle renewals, upsells, and cross-sells with existing customers.
This is in contrast to a non-specialized or unified model, where a single role (often called an "full-cycle salesperson" or "account owner") manages the entire customer lifecycle from prospecting through to renewal and expansion.
Key Factors to Consider
When deciding on your revenue ownership model, consider these critical factors:
1. Lifetime Value (LTV) Capture: Assess what percentage of a customer's total lifetime value is typically captured in the initial sale.
2. Expansion Complexity: Evaluate how complex your upsell and cross-sell processes are.
3. Product Complexity: Consider how technically complex your product or service is.
4. Sales Cycle Length: Factor in the typical length of your sales cycle for new business versus expansions.
5. Customer Segment Diversity: Think about how diverse your customer base is and whether different segments require different approaches.
Tactics for Optimizing Revenue Ownership
Now, let's explore some tactics you can use to optimize your revenue ownership model:
1. Assess Your LTV Capture Rate
Calculate what percentage of your typical customer's lifetime value is captured in the initial sale. If it's high (say, over 70%), you might lean towards specialization, with separate teams for new business and account management. If it's lower, a unified approach might be more effective.
2. Map Your Expansion Complexity
Create a flowchart of your typical expansion process. How many steps are involved? How much domain knowledge is required? If expansions are highly complex and require deep product knowledge, keeping the original sales rep involved might be beneficial.
3. Implement a "Transition Score" System
Develop a scoring system to determine when an account should transition from sales to customer success. Factors might include:
- Product adoption rate
- Customer health score
- Expansion potential
- Account complexity
Use this score to create a clear, objective handoff process.
4. Design a Collaborative Compensation Model
Create a compensation structure that encourages collaboration between sales and customer success. This might include:
- Shared quotas for account growth
- Compensation tied to customer health metrics
5. Leverage AI for Account Intelligence
Use AI and machine learning to analyze customer data and predict:
- Which accounts are prime for upsell
- Which accounts are at risk of churn
- What products or services each account is most likely to need next
This intelligence can help you decide where to focus your human resources for maximum impact.
6. Implement a "Customer Success Qualified Lead" (CSQL) Process
Just as marketing teams use MQLs, create a CSQL process where customer success teams can flag accounts that are ready for sales engagement. This ensures that sales teams are brought in at the right moment, not too early or too late.
7. Create Cross-Functional Account Plans
For key accounts, develop comprehensive account plans that involve input from sales, customer success, and product teams. This ensures all teams are aligned on the account's potential and strategy.
8. Rotate Roles for Better Understanding
Consider implementing a rotation program where sales reps spend time in customer success roles and vice versa. This can build empathy and understanding between teams, leading to better collaboration.
Customer Success isn't a Band-Aid
In some cases, a large customer success team might be compensating for poor product-market fit or a suboptimal user experience. If you find yourself needing an army of CSMs to keep customers happy and growing, it might be time to take a hard look at your product strategy.
Are there ways to make your product more intuitive, more sticky, or more naturally expandable? Could improved onboarding flows or in-app guidance reduce the need for high-touch customer success? Sometimes, the best way to optimize your revenue operations is to optimize your product itself.
Remember, there's no one-size-fits-all solution to revenue ownership. Your model should be as dynamic as your business, adapting as you scale and as your product evolves. Don't be afraid to experiment, measure results, and iterate.
The key is to keep your customer's success at the center of your strategy. Whether it's sales, customer success, or a hybrid team driving expansion and retention, the end goal remains the same: delivering value to your customers and growing together.
SDR Nerd ?? | Revenue Operator ??? | Wearer of many ??
3 个月Really valuable stuff! Thank you ????
Fractional CMO & Product Marketing Expert Leveraging AI to Help Grow B2B Tech Companies
3 个月Jonathan, why do you think that CS cannot handle complex expansions? Why would these require an AE? From my experience -- it depends on the specific organization. Even more so, it depends on the individuals in CS. I've been in an organization where CS were highly experienced and professional/technical folks, who led all expansions without any Sales involvement -- and some of these expansions were very meaningful. So bottom line -- it all depends on how you build these organizations, and what talent you recruit for them.
Entrepreneurial GTM Leader | 0-30 ARR | SaaS & AI | Ex-collect.Ai | Ex-Billwerk+ (Exit) |Revenue Architect | Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Winner | Passion for Technology & Process | HumanCentricity
3 个月What a valuable post and content for GTM Leaders Jonathan ?? All three approaches reflect fundamental principles that should be deeply embedded in every organisation in one way or another. In my model, the interdependence between SDRs, AEs and CSMs is central - each contributes to value creation by focussing on quality and a high ICP match. The SDR (more often a junior AE), acts as a wingman rather than a mere "phone machine", which creates the basis for sustainable and profitable customer relationships. The CSM is involved at an early stage, from the pre-analysis phase (technical due diligence).?It's like an Olympic relay team. However, a key principle is the integration of specialist (technical) expertise at an early stage. The involvement of business analysts or solution architects is a causal factor for the success of complex products with a high ACV - their credibility is indispensable. This combination of commercial and technical depth maximises value and minimises risk - a paradigm that is essential in a sales landscape for SaaS products in complex solution architectures.
Finance and Operations Leader
3 个月What about expansion AEs? CS does renewals and any small expansion in the contract process (new seats, etc.) but expansion AEs take the BU or product expansions. The trade off here in my experience seems to be more about whether or not the expansion leverages current contacts or is sold to different users, decision makers, etc.. What’s your experience?