The Return to a Calm After the Storm

The Return to a Calm After the Storm

It’s close to 50 years since the 1973 #energycrisis during which #oil prices quadrupled and energy rationing took place across much of the world. Europe is facing a similar challenging period now with a return to energy rationing already upon its people.??Across the world we are seeing shortages of all key energy commodities with prices of #diesel, #coal, #naturalgas at or close to multiyear highs and in the case of Europe, retail energy costs at all time highs. One thing that makes this energy crisis very different than past ones is that major participants: suppliers, customers and regulators, have all become complacent following 15 years of declining prices for everything energy related. In addition, the #energy world has become incredibly complex because of the vast array of financial derivatives that are used to hedge risks and for investment purposes. The good news is that there is light at the end of the tunnel.?

After the 1973 oil crisis, there was significant demand destruction, technology improvements (especially #nuclear), regulatory changes particularly around energy efficiency and increases in oil and gas supply, all of which together created substantial corrections in energy prices. We saw the same extreme rise and collapse in prices in 1990 after the Iraq invasion of Kuwait and again in 2008 in the rush to the $147 per barrel all-time high for crude oil.??Bottom line, high prices lead to low prices. And it will be the same this time.?

What makes this energy crisis potentially more interesting than the other crises is that central banks are scrambling across the world to control inflation and to reduce money supply following the most sustained period of money pumping in history. The result is recessionary tendencies across all major economies across the world and what is likely to happen and we are seeing it already in #Europe particularly is massive energy demand destruction. This will lead to lower prices. In the finance world it is called #meanreversion (see graph) or more simply the return to a calm after the storm.??

After the storm will come a move away from #molecules toward #electrons; in other words instead of burning #fossilfuels for nearly all of our energy usage, we will use solar, wind and other low cost #cleanenergy sources to generate #electricity. The advantages of #electrification are multifaceted, but the key advantage is #energyefficiency.?As a rule of thumb an electrical vehicle uses less than a third of the energy used by a conventional vehicle running on diesel or petroleum.

The way forward is #deepelectrification which means electrifying as much as possible of our energy system. We must start with #transport, #heat and #cooling, and heavy industrial processes which are the easiest. If we deeply electrify our energy world, then we will need less energy, noting that 60% of energy is lost enrolee to its final application, which in turn will save the customer a lot of money. In addition, deep electrification?will also lead to less burning of fossil fuels which will in turn be good for the #environment and #nationalsecurity ! Finally, the reimagining and redesigning of our energy world is probably the biggest growth opportunity I have seen in my lifetime.??What an exciting energy world we have in front of us!

David Bonner

Chief Executive, Thor Power Corporation

2 年

Gerard Reid, excellent data, analysis and commentary. Not simply in Europe, but globally, we urgently need to work against a rational, balanced, socially and economic well-thought-out strategy that is less disruptive than current actions. Energy efficiency is the correct Mission. The Vision needs to be smartened-up a bit, together with the Values of our implementation. Let's work to take a deep breath, globally; come together and take advantage of this growth potential in a less abusive environment for both the earth, and most important, it's inhabitants.

回复
Jo?o Garrido

Solar Energy Entrepreneur / EU Innovation fund - Financial Engineering Expert

2 年

Dear Gerard Reid I totally agree with you, but I am very skeptical regarding the power grids expansion. The plans for the grids are not matching the electrification's requirement. We have to solve as soon as possible this big issue.

?? Michael Hamilton

Commodities, Risk, Decarbonisation

2 年

Nice perspective. I think we also need a fundamental rethink of the way that power markets set price if we are to experience the much vaunted (and needed) deep electrification. Bottom line: If we want people to use electricity as their default choice, it must be the lowest cost of the available options, and we are far from that today...

回复
Niklas R.

Open for Accounting related. Opinions expressed are personal.

2 年

Excellent post. I would like to see repeated emphasis on The potential cost savings of not using fossil fuels, because costs of the transition and RE are lately the main counter arguments used by the FF industry. The main reasons for savings - in addition to The noted higher overall efficiency of electric energy and biosphere/extinction rate are the human health losses both from premature deaths and chronic illnesses. The human health losses are estimated at bare minimum $8 trillion annually (without costs of medicating chronic illnesses due to air pollution), which could be used to build a holistically safer society.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gerard Reid的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了