Rethinking Gold's Reliability as an Inflation Hedge
Tim Frenzel, MBA, CFA, FRM
Investment Management | Data Science | Applying AI capabilities | Professor in ML & Finance
As inflationary pressures continue to mount in global economies, many investors are looking to gold as a potential hedge against the erosion of their purchasing power. Gold has long been considered a store of value and a safe-haven asset in times of economic and political turmoil. Being a tangible asset with a limited supply, Gold offers a degree of protection against currency debasement and can serve as a reliable store of value during inflationary periods.
The Shifting Performance Drivers of Gold
The performance of gold is influenced by an intricate web of factors, making it a complex and multifaceted asset. While long-term trends and macroeconomic forces are crucial in determining gold's overall trajectory, short-term price movements are shaped by a diverse array of influences, including market demand shifts, geopolitical tensions, and changes in investor sentiment. As a result, the drivers of gold prices are constantly shifting, reflecting the dynamic nature of the global economy and the investment landscape.
Expected vs Unexpected Inflation
Investors often employ gold as a hedge against unexpected inflation, as it is more disruptive to their portfolios compared to expected inflation, which is already factored into asset prices such as bonds. Treasury bond prices, for example, are notably affected by unexpected inflation arising from unforeseen events, as their current prices carry the expected real interest rate, an expected inflation rate, and a risk premium. An unexpected surge in inflation typically causes the expected inflation embedded in the yield to rise and the bond price to fall. If the new level of expected inflation is permanent, bonds with higher durations will be more sensitive than those with shorter durations. Commodities, particularly gold and energy, show stronger performance as they often contribute to inflationary pressures. Notably, unexpected inflation poses significant risks for equity investors.
Gold, on the other hand, demonstrates unique performance patterns during periods of expected and unexpected inflation. Unexpected inflation, calculated as the realized inflation level minus the expected inflation typically uses the change in the inflation rate as a proxy. Alternative and more advanced statistical models, such as autoregressive time series models, can help derive the expected inflation rate, which can then be used to gauge unexpected inflation. However, Ang 2014 suggested that simpler models are a good approximation compared to other forecasts methods such as surveys.
Inflation beta, a widely utilized measure by practitioners and researchers, captures the sensitivity of diverse assets and investment strategies to unexpected inflation. Generally, bonds and equities exhibit negative inflation betas, while assets like gold or trend-following strategies display positive betas.
As shown in the chart below, commodities such as gold and real estate have demonstrated high unexpected inflation betas, ranging from 2 to 8 over the past five decades. In the case of gold, this implies that a 1% increase in unexpected inflation could potentially result in an 8% price increase. Conversely, equities and bonds have proven to be less effective in mitigating the effects of unexpected inflation.
It is worth mentioning that a comprehensive study conducted by Erb and Harvey (2013) explores the long-term efficacy of gold as an inflation hedge. Their research indicates that gold's considerable volatility undermines its reliability as a hedge, with its performance primarily fueled by the extraordinary appreciation during the oil shock of 1979 to 1980, subsequent to the Iranian revolution. This period witnessed the real gold price skyrocketing to an unprecedented high, while inflation rates surged to approximately 13%.
Evidence of comovement between unexpected inflation and gold performance varies across countries. Positive comovement is consistently observed between US unexpected inflation and gold, whereas episodes of negative comovement transpire in other countries, particularly during negative unexpected inflation periods. This asymmetric relationship between gold and inflation shocks underscores the importance of gold as a strategic asset in hedging against the detrimental effects of unexpected inflation on investment portfolios.
Structural Changes - Is Gold still an effective inflation hedge?
Historically, gold prices were closely correlated with consumer price inflation. According to a study by the World Gold Council using data since 1971, gold has returned 15% per annum on average when inflation has been higher than 3%, compared to just over 6% per annum when inflation has been sub-3%. However, evidence suggests the interaction between the gold price and inflation is now weaker, arguably since the early ‘90s, and it’s important to understand the cause to determine whether it is a permanent breakdown.
The abolition of the Bretton Woods system in 1971 does for many mark a major structural change for the gold market since now it become something like a true free market that is free to react to the interplay of supply and demand.
Using a factor decomposition model, allows us to isolate the primary drivers of gold prices over time. This is particularly noteworthy during the aforementioned Second Oil Crisis which witnessed the real gold price soaring to a record high. The period between 1979-1982 (left chart), which is the Second Oil Crisis, had the following key factors pushing up the gold price:
In contrast, the financial crisis period from 2007-2010 (right chart) had a different set of factors influencing the gold price:
领英推荐
As visible now, there are many constantly shifting factors that impact gold's correlation with real rates which result in an overall inconsistent reliability of gold as an inflation hedge. Key factors like concerns over economic recessions and elevated central bank buying have contributed to gold's resilience in an environment of fluctuating real interest rates. Going forward, there may be additional factors that need to be taken into consideration:
Gold vs. Bitcoin
Gold and Bitcoin, both considered debasement hedges due to their limited supply, have been increasingly utilized as inflation hedges amidst ongoing geopolitical conflicts, market volatility, and rising inflationary pressures. However, their performances as investment assets have been notably different. Gold, a defensive real asset, saw a 10% rally in the first three months of 2023 and has historically demonstrated negative correlation to equities during market downturns. Its strong performance has been supported by increased non-speculative demand from jewelry buyers, central banks, and recession hedging investors.
In contrast, Bitcoin's value has dropped, even after considering its recent 50% rally in Q1 2023,? more than 60% since its peak in November 2021. The cryptocurrency's high volatility and sensitivity to financial conditions are likely to persist until it develops more real-world applications. Tighter financial conditions are anticipated to have a more significant impact on Bitcoin returns compared to gold, as Bitcoin adoption has been fueled by easy financial conditions.
Gold's lower duration and defensive properties make it a better portfolio diversifier than Bitcoin in times of tighter financial conditions. While gold prices may continue to rise with anticipated rate hikes, Bitcoin's potential as an inflation hedge remains uncertain due to its volatility and dependence on the development of real use cases beyond speculative interest. Furthermore, Bitcoin's price fluctuations are not isolated from economic events. During the COVID-19 crisis in March 2020, Bitcoin dropped more than 50% as investors sought safe-haven assets like US Treasuries. However, as the outlook improved, Bitcoin soared over 800% in the following 12 months. This indicates that Bitcoin is a speculative asset with a positive beta against the US market and may not consistently provide positive real returns during periods of unexpected inflation.
Lastly, examining returns on a risk-adjusted basis using the Sharpe Ratio (see below), Bitcoin only surpasses gold when bought 6-7 years ago. Later purchases, while yielding higher absolute returns, face increased volatility.
Portfolio View
Gold's role in diversifying investment portfolios has evolved over time. As a non-yielding asset, gold may not be an ideal choice for investors seeking regular income or high capital appreciation. As a strategic asset, gold's low correlation to traditional financial instruments enhances its diversification potential in a multi-asset portfolio. Historically, the correlations between gold and equity and fixed income benchmark returns have been low, with recent correlations around 0.2 for equity and 0.4 for fixed income.
The inherent stability of gold as a real asset with established use cases lends itself to improved portfolio performance, particularly in times of tightened financial conditions. Consequently, this stability bolsters the Sharpe Ratio of a diversified portfolio, even when gold's returns may be comparatively lower. In a multi-asset portfolio, a gold allocation of over 5% is recommended to enhance the Sharpe Ratio of a traditional 60/40 portfolio, ensuring a more favorable risk-return balance. This allocation becomes even more crucial in the current climate, characterized by heightened inflationary pressures or a confluence of lower inflation rates and reduced GDP growth. Given these macroeconomic factors, investors should consider increasing their gold exposure beyond the minimum threshold to fortify their portfolios against market volatility and economic uncertainty, while simultaneously reaping the diversification benefits inherent in the precious metal.
Short-term view
As inflation continues to hover above target levels, central banks are expected to raise interest rates and implement tightening measures, which may lead to higher bond yields and pressure gold prices. However, the exact degree of policy intervention remains uncertain due to the delicate balancing act required to prevent an economic recession.?
Gold may benefit from sustained periods of heightened inflation as a powerful catalyst, though this depends on the Federal Reserve's response. If the Fed convincingly demonstrates its commitment to bringing inflation back to the 2% target, gold prices could face downside risk. Alternatively, gold prices may rise if the Fed exhibits an inflationary bias akin to the 1970s, shifting its focus away from inflation reduction. A successful soft landing in the US economy appears increasingly narrow, bolstering gold's safe-haven status and offsetting the impact of higher real rates on the metal, while adversely affecting the broader commodity complex. To truly decouple gold from the dollar and real rates, market participants must begin to question the Fed's dedication to its inflation target, as witnessed earlier this year or during the 1970s. Furthermore, the current low levels of ETF fund inflows and the notably depressed gold net managed money positions may offer a source of downside support.
Reference
Disclaimer: This information is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute fiduciary investment advice or a basis for investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The material does not offer a distribution, invitation, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell securities or engage in investment activities, nor has it been reviewed by any regulatory authority.
Senior Portfolio Manager at ETHENEA Independent Investors S.A.
1 年As always, very interesting and insightful discussion.