Rethinking the Future of Work
Dr Jen Frahm
Exploring new frontiers, change and agility, connecting people, culture, leadership, and technology.
Last year I attended Pausefest, a conference known for being at the intersection of tech, entrepreneurship, business, and creativity. It was terrific – I had an enjoyable time and saw a lot of great speakers.
But, I walked away a little disquieted.
There were several speakers purporting to be talking of Future of Work (FOW), but the content of their talks was very much the Now of Work (NOW). Or, at least it is for many of my clients.
So, for example, what I would have said to be the now of work are:
- AI / VR / ML and ethics of tech.
- Distributed workplace.
- Flexible work.
- A focus on diversity and inclusion.
- The human zeitgeist – vulnerability, empathy, courage.
- Agility.
- Micro and nano learning.
- Freelancer / gig economy.
- Neuro anything.
- Human-centred design / design principles / design thinking.
But as the noted Science fiction writer William Gibson might have said
“the future is already here, it’s just not very evenly distributed”.
All considerations of future are relative to where you are now.
Which had me thinking: What percentage of businesses do you need adopting these FOW practices to make it NOW practice? Is it just that I work with those who are early adopters? And I was reminded of Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation model, which tells us that innovators make up 2.5% of the market, and early adopters 13.5 % – and the market share of new technology doesn’t come close to saturation until you have the late majority (34%) and laggards (16% across the line).
To be honest, I’m not across the latest innovation research which might show that this model from 1962 is now superseded (do let me know if you are across more contemporary models!) But, in thinking about this, I wondered what it would take to accelerate the uptake of these practices for those who are laggards etc?
A pandemic? Yes, that was certainly effective with flexible work.
Rapid, large-scale, forced disruption moved whole industries into flexible work / gig economy and distributed organisational forms. Whole technology budgets were thrown out the window and reworked to ensure that organisations have the technology infrastructure to support the new world.
However, we also saw that without vulnerability, courage, and empathy, leaders quickly worked out that they didn’t have what it took lead remote teams in a crisis.
And I’m still left thinking “Well, if these trends are not the Future of Work, what are the FOW trends?”
What’s next? What is the Future of Work?
From my perspective intentional change still looms large. Over the last year we saw large scale paralysis and a very blinkered view on organisational change. Most companies focused on moving employees to remote working, few took the opportunity to make substantive change to their businesses. Shell-shock will do that to you.
While I thought these four options were the priority for last year, I think I was ahead of my time. They must surely be a focus this year.
Reintegrating – for those companies who will take some of what they have adopted to handle the pandemic and align with past practices that worked well. It will be a hybrid model that will be confusing for many – this is an area that strong change communication will be essential.
Renewing – for some organisations, it will be an opportunity to renew – start from scratch, nurture the growth of the new organisation perhaps in different patterns of operation. Renewal brings with it a tempering of aspiration and a softer, kinder way of being.
Revolting – some organisations won’t be able to return to the way they were. They will have changed irrevocably for the better, and any attempt to return will be met with revolt. This will be exceptionally painful for those companies whose governance models are based on security and stability.
Reinventing – those businesses who now find that the ‘now’ has left their services and products obsolete, but still have the financial and spiritual means to do so, will reinvent themselves. The trick in this one will be the level of authenticity needed to do it. Previous examples of re-inventions have worked because of a passionate founder, or complementary capabilities. You will need credibility to achieve this.
And with all four of these options I cannot highlight enough how critical it will be to have people with strong organisational psychology / counselling / coaching skills and very high emotional intelligence by your side in the move.
Many people will be entering into these changes from a traumatised state. Others will be experiencing survivor guilt because they didn’t struggle a huge amount with the forced change. Some will be surging ahead, buoyed by post-traumatic growth. If we thought organisational change was a complex psychological process before, it has just got exponentially challenging for many.
Technology trends
From a technology trends perspective, Amy Webb in last year’s Future Today Institute Technical Trends Annual Report says, there were nine key takeaways:
1. We are entering an era of synthetics which will lead to transformational improvements in vaccine production, tissue production and medical treatments.
2. We’re heading towards augmented hearing and sight. Beyond the implications for medical and fashion industries, what does this mean for people who traditionally have been excluded from certain careers because of hearing or sight impairment?
3. As-A-Service continues, this time with AI and Data.
4. China has created a new world order – it’s probably too late if you have not considered what will change in your business because of this.
5. Hello Alexa – home and office automation is mainstream.
6. Hello Black Mirror – we are all being scored, and that will determine our offers, our services, and our social class.
7. Fear is great for business, outright scaremongering is a core strategy for political parties and organisations alike. It’s going to be a great time for therapists, medication, and security companies.
8. There is no forgetting, technology will ensure everything is recorded and recalled and we do not have a right to prevent that.
With respect to 5,6, 7, and 8 we are now entering into the commercialisation of trust. Services to create, engender, and manipulate trust will explode. Keep your eyes out for the 2021 report released in March.
Economic trends
Simon Mair, Research Fellow in Ecological Economics, Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity, University of Surrey presents a slightly more grim perspective based on what this all means for our economic models of being and certainly this was born out my government responses to the pandemic.
These include:
State capitalism: centralised response, prioritising exchange value.
Barbarism: decentralised response, prioritising exchange value.
State socialism: centralised response, prioritising the protection of life.
Mutual aid: decentralised response prioritising the protection of life.
The bottom line is this: Assess what will be deemed necessary in each of these models and make your move if you’re not in that line of work NOW.
Skills trends
From a skills perspective, Tim Rayner, UTS entrepreneurship lecturer and author of Hacking Culture and the New Rules of Innovation says in his article “It’s 2038: What kind of jobs are available?”
- Widespread automation of formulaic tasks.
- Human work focussed on problem-solving in teams.
- Soft skills required = empathy, active listening, non-violent communication, plus a host of capabilities associated with art and design – creativity is essential.
And, adjusted for current conditions:
- Remote/virtual work is the norm
But what say you, who has their crystal ball out? What where the predictions you made, and what are you saying now? What is the future of work in your world?
Dr Jen Frahm - always thought-provoking. Personally I've witnessed a real "deer in the headlight" approach from many orgs. Often under the banner of "this is a 12month blip and we'll revert back". I fear in that an enormous opportunity to re-set and recalibrate was lost. When normalcy, in whatever form it takes, returns I imagine millions will be irrevocably changed and returning to before will be unpalatable to many. What I'm left wondering is when organizations (public, private and NFP) will recognize the obsession with shareholder value should be exorcised entirely. I've been taken by topics like "mutuality" (Thanks Jay Jakub) and Judy Samuelson new book. We urgently need to reframe the purpose of business to be less exploitive economically, spiritually, emotionally, physically. A boy can dream!
Chairman, President and CEO
4 年Fascinating perspective and raises critical governance and technology issues
Innovation Management, Organizational Transformation, Leadership, and Change Management. Masters degree in Organizational Innovation Management.
4 年Thanks for posting. I find it very interesting, to follow and read about, how companies might, best prepare for the future. Using these perspectives and recommendations, in my own line of work, as Organisational Agile Coach. For many companies, these new ways of getting ready for the future, often involve both a cultural change, "reprogramming" peoples mindset and a change in leadership style. There might not be a " one fits all" approach to this, but I personally would love to see more debate and discussion on these topics. We covered the WHY and the WHAT on FoW, but did we nail the HOW?
(he/him) Founder, #WeLeadComms; Editor-in-Chief, Strategic; Communication Consultant and Strategist
4 年Very punchy, great end-to-end look at the workplace and the society it resides in.
Chair, The Health and Care Professions Council; Chair, Sonas Group (Wellbeing at Work); Chair and Lay Director, Personal Finance Society; Executive Mentor, The ExCo Group; Trustee, Positive Planet
4 年What l think your article illustrates beautifully is that to be the FOW, you have to see the big difference between FOW and Now. Even if the exact future picture as painted is different (as it almost invariably will be), the shift must be a leap, not a step. Where are the possible impacts of space exploration, an agri-revolution, geo-political governance, nano and quantum tech, et al, factored into 'going digital' because the pandemic forced your hand..