Rethinking AI Collaboration

Rethinking AI Collaboration

If you've seen any of my previous posts, you'll know I'm a passionate advocate for AI, particularly large language models (LLMs). LLMs are a type of AI that can understand and generate human-like text based on vast amounts of data they've been trained on. I've integrated this technology extensively into my daily work and it's greatly increased my productivity. When I first started using LLMs like ChatGPT, I sought out YouTube videos and online articles to learn how to create effective prompts. I found tons of information, but one crucial aspect seemed to be missing from almost everything I encountered…LLMs are at their best when I treat them like a human collaborator, not a digital servant.

We've all been conditioned to view technology as a tool that responds to commands. We ask a search engine for information, and we expect a neat list of results. However, if we use an LLM in the same rigid way, we're bound to be disappointed. It's like asking a world-renowned chef to make you a grilled cheese sandwich – they're capable of much more. In my experience, many people who have experimented with tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini may not yet realize their full potential. They're still stuck in the mindset of using LLMs as a simple question-and-answer tool, rather than engaging in a dynamic, collaborative process. By failing to provide context, ask follow-up questions, and explore ideas together, they're missing out on the true value of these powerful AI models.

LLMs are not simply search engines or basic tools. They're capable of generating nuanced, creative, and even surprising responses that go far beyond the initial prompt. For example, in my work, if I'm engineering a process dependent upon chemical reaction rates, I might simply ask an LLM for a list of relevant citations. While this could provide some useful information, it barely scratches the surface of what an LLM can do.

To me, the LLM should be approached as if it were a human expert.? If I were conversing with a chemistry expert, I wouldn't simply ask for a list of citations and leave it at that. I'd ask probing questions, seek their insights on complex issues, and leveraging their expertise to explore new ideas. That’s how I approach my interactions with LLMs.? By engaging with them as if they were human experts, I've found that I can tap into their deep knowledge and problem-solving capabilities in a much more meaningful way.

To illustrate this point, let's return to the example of chemical reaction rates. Instead of merely asking for citations, I could frame my inquiry with context and open myself up to a broader range of ideas. For instance, if the reason I'm interested in reaction rates is to understand how to optimize an industrial process, I might ask the LLM:

"I'm working on optimizing an industrial process that involves a series of chemical reactions. I need to understand the reaction rates involved in order to identify potential bottlenecks and speed up the overall process. Can you help me explore the factors that influence reaction rates, and suggest strategies for accelerating them in a real-world setting?"

By approaching the LLM as a collaborator and providing context, I invite a deeper, more insightful conversation. Such a prompt results in the following LLM response (in this case, Claude Opus):

"There are several key factors that influence chemical reaction rates, including temperature, concentration of reactants, presence of catalysts, and surface area of reactants. In industrial settings, these factors are often manipulated to optimize reaction rates and improve process efficiency. For example, increasing temperature or concentration can speed up reactions, as can using catalysts or increasing the surface area of reactants through techniques like grinding or using porous materials.

To identify bottlenecks in your specific process, I'd suggest first gathering data on the current reaction rates at each step. This can help pinpoint which reactions are slowest and potentially limiting the overall process. From there, you can experiment with adjusting the factors mentioned above to see if you can accelerate the rate-limiting steps.

Some specific strategies to consider:

  • Increasing temperature (within safe limits for your process and materials)
  • Increasing concentration of reactants
  • Trying different catalysts to lower the activation energy of key reactions
  • Finding ways to increase surface area of reactants, like using smaller particle sizes

I'd also recommend running some simulations or small-scale experiments to test the impact of these changes before implementing them in your full-scale process. This can help you optimize your approach and avoid unintended consequences."

While this example is purposely generic, it highlights a dynamic exchange of ideas, where the LLM acts as a knowledgeable partner, helping me explore complex concepts and generate novel solutions. By treating LLMs as collaborative partners rather than mere tools, I've unlocked their full potential and found innovative solutions to the challenges I face in my work.

If you've been disappointed in your first attempts to engage LLMs, I suggest you reframe your interaction. Instead of treating it like a simple question-and-answer tool, approach it as if you were speaking to a brilliant colleague. Challenge it to offer deeper insights and push the boundaries of what you think is possible. If the answers aren't complete enough, don't hesitate to ask for more information or clarification. If you disagree with a point, explain your reasoning and for another perspective.

Many people in the AI community talk about the importance of prompt engineering, crafting the perfect prompt to get the desired response from an LLM. While there's certainly value in understanding how to structure your queries effectively, I've found that the real key to success is much simpler. I treat the LLM as a collaborative partner. I engage in a genuine dialogue, just as I would with a human expert. I ask follow-up questions, explore tangential ideas, and am not afraid to dig deeper.

By embracing this mindset shift and engaging your new digital partner fully, you'll unlock the true potential of LLMs and discover possibilities you never knew existed…just as I have. The power of these tools lies not just in their vast access to knowledge, but in their ability to help us think in new ways and solve problems more creatively. Don't settle for simple interactions.? Dive in, explore, and let curiosity guide you. The productivity you uncover may just surprise you.

I have not dug into AI at all. Your article has opened the door a bit and I will engage. My current passion is history/genealogy. The memory needed to research and uncover facts is quite a vigorous brain exercise , which I really enjoy. I could see a great partner in AI. Thanks Peter for sharing your knowledge and perspectives.

赞
回复
Bobby Radakovich

Environment and Health Digital Transformation Lead

7 个月

Great article about collaborating with LLM and digging deeper into AI.

赞
回复
Jacquie Maupin, MPA, LSSBB

Healthcare Improver | Taming Complexity & Delivering Impact | Six Sigma & Project Management Expert | Cohesive Team Builder | Organization Transformation | Workshop Facilitator with Flair

7 个月

Avi Fishman, MBA - You may find Peter's article on AI in the workplace interesting.

Gregory Soroka, MBA

DMTS Network Infrastructure Planning at Verizon

7 个月

Great article and advice!

Martin Kannengieser

Investment Director at Austrade

7 个月

Interesting article. I will try to incorporate AI into some work that I am doing. Thanks for the useful advice.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Peter Kalish的更多文章

  • Why is AI adoption happening so slowly?

    Why is AI adoption happening so slowly?

    In an era where AI is making headlines daily, you might expect widespread adoption of tools like ChatGPT. Yet the…

    8 条评论
  • How Context and Why Shape Success with GenAI

    How Context and Why Shape Success with GenAI

    In my last post, I discussed how treating GenAI like a collaborator - rather than just a tool - is what, I believe…

    2 条评论
  • Tapping into GenAI’s Strengths Through Collaborative Dialogue

    Tapping into GenAI’s Strengths Through Collaborative Dialogue

    In many of my recent conversations about Generative AI (GenAI), I’ve noticed that most people still approach it like…

    6 条评论
  • The Principled Path to Green Hydrogen – are we letting perfect be the enemy of good?

    The Principled Path to Green Hydrogen – are we letting perfect be the enemy of good?

    The US Treasury recently leaked Section 45V hydrogen production tax credit regulations, that may become part of the…

    8 条评论
  • Echoes of the Quality Revolution: 5 Lessons for Today’s Sustainability Movement

    Echoes of the Quality Revolution: 5 Lessons for Today’s Sustainability Movement

    Back in the 1980s and 90s, I recall how quality enthusiasts sought to change how US manufacturing was wired. Their…

    13 条评论
  • SUSTAINABILITY IS THE NEW QUALITY

    SUSTAINABILITY IS THE NEW QUALITY

    If you’ve been around long enough, you may share my feeling of déjà vu when it comes to sustainability. Let me explain……

    1 条评论
  • Scary Train Ride

    Scary Train Ride

    It’s been a while since I’ve traveled on a commuter train at rush hour. My own daily commute is down the hall past our…

    5 条评论
  • Thank You, Dad

    Thank You, Dad

    Dad passed away several years back. As he won't be celebrating Thanksgiving with us, I thought it appropriate to take…

    4 条评论
  • Dodging (Disease) Bullets

    Dodging (Disease) Bullets

    It's the first visual that jumped into my head as I laid in a hospital bed last month..

    31 条评论
  • 30 Days of Work Advice to My Grown Sons

    30 Days of Work Advice to My Grown Sons

    FORWARD To Alex, Andrew, Adam and Aaron, When Alex was a teenager, there was a moment when your Mom and I realized that…

    22 条评论