Resurrection and the Link to Architecture

Religious buildings have generally held to the narrative of simulating the fourth dimension by the practice of geometry in the formation of its architecture. A practice that is tried and tested but without any sort of resultant proof that its purveyor can rise again in another dimensional reality. While they gather a flock of firm believers reading this testament to an unfounded truth, architects have been challenged to quantify the argument in question to alleviate the worries of the skeptics. 

The notion of the fourth dimension is implied through the art of drawing; a projective technique that sets a precise angle to operate an isometric view through the recognised development of dimensions from the point. It disguises depth from some views and expands in others. It is by this implication that this degree is utilized by architecture. The necessity is for an architect to see where this has been ‘played’ and for what purpose.

What is the root of architecture, or has been, or needs to be and when? When the issue of time is put into disarray and the ‘resurrection’ has succeeded what is there left for architecture to do. Has the architect received a new life or is there a new life for architecture and the geometry that surrounds it. Must the ‘machine’ and its flock be cast asunder, as this can only have been a singular perseverance for the fact of defining ‘space’.

Is space limitless or can we determine strict boundaries? The originality in breaching time by the art of architecture is not currently celebrated. It would assert an authority that has no justification to the sanctity of human life. In the refinement of architecture we would need to equate its expense by the economy of area, both physically and mathematically and let the architect provide this longevity as a service.