Results of the documentation benchmarks survey

Results of the documentation benchmarks survey

Over the past few months we have conducted a number of surveys asking people about documentation management in their organizations. The following is a summary of the results.

Respondents

The respondents were predominantly from private (45%) and listed (30%) companies, with the remainder divided fairly evenly between not-for-profits, government agencies, and educational and scientific institutions. Median organization size was 500 employees; the sample included a reasonable representation of both SMEs (20 - 100 employees) and large enterprises (5000+ employees).

In looking at the results below, bear in mind that the respondents were self-selected: this implies that they had at least a general interest in documentation in their organization.

Management system standards

Most responding organizations have documentation to comply with at least one management system standard.

Languages

Most respondents report that their documentation is in English. No doubt this is partly a consequence of the contexts in which the surveys were publicized (English language discussion forums, for the most part). However, 30 percent of respondents report that their documentation is in two languages, and 10 percent in more than two. One organization has documentation in 22 languages. The mind boggles.

Objectives

In order of priority, what are the main uses for your documentation?

 

 

Documentation management

Is there a formal procedure for creating, reviewing, and issuing documentation?
Yes: 90%
No: 10%

Does any one person have overall control of the documentation?
Yes: 49%
No: 51%

Does your organization have a Knowledge Manager?
Yes: 27%
No: 73%

Writing and approval

Does each item of documentation have a single manager who is accountable for the content?
Yes: 79%
No: 21%

Does your organization use external suppliers to prepare documentation?
Never: 53%
Sometimes: 39%
Regularly: 8%
Always: 0

Are documents routinely referred to subject matter experts during development?

How many people review each document before it is issued?
1: 16%
2 - 5: 64%
5+: 10%

On average, how long does it take to revise and re-issue a document?

A few organizations reported review cycles than can exceed 12 months; and one brave soul reported that the question was not applicable: their documentation was prepared in 2006, and has never been revised.

Physical management

Physically, how does your organization manage its documentation?

Is there a master register of all documentation?
Yes: 50%
No: 50%

Is there a master index, for searching the entire set of documentation?
Yes: 54%
No: 46%

Physical production

What is the usual finished form of the documentation?

Are different personnel responsible for writing and for formatting?
Yes (one person writes the content and someone else does the formatting): 45%
No (the writer does the formatting also): 55%

What software is normally used to create documentation?

What non-text elements are routinely included in the documentation?

When documentation is issued, how are affected personnel notified?

Documentation costs

Most organizations have no idea about the costs or value of their documentation. To some extent this is (presumably) because preparing documentation is considered, for many managers, to be 'part of the job' — and the costs are thus not isolated.

Does the organization track the costs of creating and maintaining documentation?
Yes: 26%
No: 74%

Is the value of the existing documentation shown in the organization's balance sheet?
Yes: 12%
No: 88%

Approximately how much does the organization spend, per year, creating and maintaining documentation (in USD)?

George Kesteven is the Phrontex lead consultant. Phrontex is a business management system for organizations that want to turn their documented knowledge into an intellectual property asset.
Rebekah Lawrence

Experienced technical communicator.

9 年

I particularly noticed that 26% tracked the cost of documentation, but only 12% tracked the value....and I wonder if the 12% are among the 26% or a completely different group.

回复
Ellis Pratt

Director at Cherryleaf. Technical writing and training services for successful onboarding and lower customer churn. APIs, AI, online Help

9 年

How many organisations were surveyed?

Christine Leninger

Content Futurist, Producer, Editor, Book Publisher

9 年

I feel like although many companies still use MS Word for producing their documentation, there was a whole grouping of applications specific to document creation that was left out. And no reported information on HTML doc editing? That is surprising.

回复

I'd be interested to know what markets you surveyed. I don't know of very many organizations who are ISO-9001 (unless you used "quality" as a generic term?), and I don't know any who use Word as their documentation tool, who don't have a knowledge management system, and so on. I'm not sure I caught the total number of organizations surveyed. Nor what the definition of "documentation" is -- is this printed documentation? PDF? Online user assistance?

回复
Cliff Poon

Certification Services Practitioner

9 年

An interesting survey and foreseeable outcomes. Any implications from the objective of this exercise, that I am interested?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

George Kesteven的更多文章

  • Why is most corporate documentation so awful?

    Why is most corporate documentation so awful?

    Most organizations have a terrible time with their policy and procedure documentation. Most corporate documentation is…

    3 条评论
  • How to build a governance management system

    How to build a governance management system

    The core purpose of an organization’s knowledge management — its system for creating, maintaining, and communicating…

    4 条评论
  • The meanings and measures of corporate governance

    The meanings and measures of corporate governance

    The term ‘corporate governance’ is used with a wide variety of meanings. It’s taken for granted that ‘good governance’…

    1 条评论
  • Why is corporate documentation so bad?

    Why is corporate documentation so bad?

    The traditional approach to documentation, as a collection of separate documents, cannot work. This is not an…

    2 条评论
  • Knowledge management: Taming the compliance requirements

    Knowledge management: Taming the compliance requirements

    Most compliance requirements, taken individually, are relatively straightforward. Time-consuming and expensive perhaps,…

    1 条评论
  • Effective documentation: How to get the corporate policies under control

    Effective documentation: How to get the corporate policies under control

    Your organization’s policies are the foundation of your corporate governance system. If you need to prove that your…

    3 条评论
  • The two meanings of 'quality'

    The two meanings of 'quality'

    The word ‘quality’ is used in a lot of ways. In the ISO 9000 world, uses of the word sometimes verge on mysticism…

    10 条评论
  • Integrated compliance: how to make it work

    Integrated compliance: how to make it work

    Every organization has a primary objective. For a business, this is usually commercial performance: returning a profit…

    1 条评论
  • Dealing with the documentation disaster

    Dealing with the documentation disaster

    Most documentation goes unread, for good reason: most documentation isn’t worth reading. It is rare to find an…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了