Response to Rise of the Superfake

Response to Rise of the Superfake

It seems about every ten years the New York Times Magazine will publish a piece that hangs on the moral ambiguity around purchasing counterfeits. I recall this one about shopping for counterfeits on Canal St. in NYC (how quaint: IRL purchasing of fakes); and now the latest one published last week looking at the rise of the “superfake”.


The TL;DR is that the author, enticed by an online ad, and a network facilitated by online intermediaries, caves to the pressures of commercialism and pecuniary recklessness and buys a “superfake” bag online, delivered to her door through a series of transshipments in Europe and the Middle East.

The author addresses the surface issues those in the brand protection space would immediately raise – counterfeiters don’t pay taxes, don’t have good labor practices, feed into criminal networks, and ride on the work of legit businesses, designers and creators.

Beyond the demand side, where most countries have not placed liability on end consumers (unlike France – where she travels, feeling a little guilty/thrilled about her crime); she pins the blame on the supply side problem which is mainly on the pressures for local Chinese officials (where the superfake factories are in Southern China) who wouldn’t pursue suppliers because of the local jobs creation (and concomitant corruption payments? -- something she doesn’t mention) despite China’s anti-counterfeiting laws. Ultimately, the production, marketing and distribution is compartmentalized into blocks (or cells), which are distributed, and relatively anonymized, ensuring the network remains robust even when one block is taken out.

What to do? Time Warp Again...

Thinking back to the Canal Street article published 10 years ago now – I am reminded of a global policy initiative that cratered around that time: the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). It’s got a number of good policies worth looking into and dare I say resurrecting for the next quarter century with some tweaks, given how the trade in counterfeit goods has become increasingly intertwined with online commerce.

I suggested in a think tank piece last year that we raise from the dead these and other new public-private-partnership ideas. Check out my full thesis here at the East-West Center, courtesy of the Korea Foundation.

Resurrect ACTA, but for Digital Trade

For the policy wonk in you, read the whole text of the ACTA here. But some of the good parts are found in articles 22, 25, 28, 33 and 36: provisions addressing civil judicial provisional remedies, disclosure of information to right holders to assist in the determination of infringement, tackling counterfeit goods in-transit and in small parcels for commercial purposes, encouraging more information sharing from online service providers to detect and deter infringement, domestic and international cooperation mechanisms, including the formation of a committee to monitor implementation and operation. Wonder if any of these would have helped prevent the superfake problem we face now???

Great writing by Ms. Wang, the author of the NYT piece, despite her lapse around IP protection - and I love how she ends the article quoting her fake bag seller's (she knows what's up) chengyu: 一分錢一分貨(you get what you pay).

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Seth Hays的更多文章

  • #20 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #20 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    To read the full version please visit our Substack and subscribe. Quotations are truncated below in LinkedIn.

  • #19 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #19 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    Read on Substack for the full edition. Below quoted material will be truncated on LinkedIn Thanks for reading this…

    1 条评论
  • Asia at the Paris AI Action Summit

    Asia at the Paris AI Action Summit

    We round-up some of the activity by Asian countries in and around the AI Action Summit. Join our discussion on substack…

  • #18 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #18 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    Read the full version on Substack: https://asiaaipolicymonitor.substack.

  • #17 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #17 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    2025 Year Ahead, Korea, Japan, Taiwan AI Acts - Privacy rules on AI in South Korea and the Philippines, China…

  • #16 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #16 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    Originally published on Substack in December. Subscribe to get the latest edition.

  • #15 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #15 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    Be sure to read the full version on Substack to get the complete newsletter a week ahead of LinkedIn: Asia AI Policy…

  • #14 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    #14 Asia AI Policy Monitor

    Thanks for reading this month’s newsletter along with over 1,600 other AI policy professionals across multiple…

  • #13 AI Policy in Asia

    #13 AI Policy in Asia

    Military, GenAI, Human Rights, AI Safety Institutes, Trust/Safety in Thailand, China, Australia, Malaysia, Taiwan…

  • Asia AI Policy Monitor #11 & #12

    Asia AI Policy Monitor #11 & #12

    Thanks for reading this month’s newsletter along with over 1,200 other AI policy professionals globally across multiple…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了