RERA Update Series – 1

Understanding RERA and Civil Court Jurisdiction Through Real-World Cases?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), was established to enhance transparency and accountability in the real estate sector. However, its boundaries and interplay with civil court jurisdiction can often seem complex. Let's explore this through three key legal decisions that shed light on when and how RERA applies, providing valuable insights into navigating these legal landscapes.

Navigating Contract Disputes: Tejas Shoor vs. Godrej Vestamark LLP

The Dilemma:?

Tejas Shoor signed a contract to buy a property from Godrej Vestamark LLP but later decided to back out and demanded his earnest money back. Godrej insisted that the dispute fell under RERA’s umbrella, citing a specific clause in their agreement.?

The Legal Turning Point:

The case reached the Saket District Court, which faced the critical question: Should such disputes be exclusively resolved by RERA tribunals, or could civil courts also weigh in, especially when RERA's provisions do not explicitly cover certain disputes??

The Resolution:?

The court ruled that in the absence of explicit RERA coverage over this dispute, civil courts retained their jurisdiction. This decision highlighted an important legal principle: contracts suggesting RERA arbitration or jurisdiction cannot prevent access to civil courts if RERA is silent on the issue.?

Broadening the Scope: V.C. Thankamagan vs. K. Ganesh and Anr.

The Conflict:

V. C. Thankamagan found himself in a legal battle involving property disputes under the shadow of RERA’s regulations, arguing that only RERA had the jurisdiction due to its comprehensive regulatory framework.

The Legal Challenge:?

The issue was whether RERA completely replaced civil court authority to handle property disputes, including those involving contractual breaches or delays in construction.

The Outcome:

The Madras High Court affirmed that RERA is supplementary to civil court jurisdiction and does not replace it unless explicitly stated. This ruling reassured stakeholders that civil courts could intervene where RERA provides insufficient remedies, offering broader protection in property disputes.?

Joint Venture Complications: Akshay & Anr. vs. Aditya & Ors.

The Situation: Akshay and another landowner entered into a joint venture with a developer. The relationship deteriorated, and after revoking their power of attorney given to the developer, they faced legal repercussions from affected homebuyers.

The Legal Examination:?

The central question was whether the landowners could dissociate from the contractual obligations made by the developer before they revoked his power of attorney.

The Verdict:?

The Supreme Court held that the landowners were jointly liable with the developer for the obligations created under their joint venture. Importantly, the court noted that revoking authority does not absolve past authorized actions, emphasizing that legal responsibilities extend beyond the termination of contractual powers.

In Conclusion?

These cases collectively enhance our understanding of how RERA and civil laws intersect and operate. They illustrate that while RERA provides a regulatory framework, civil courts play an essential role in ensuring justice and offering remedies beyond what RERA might explicitly cover.

Key Takeaways:?

- Civil courts maintain jurisdiction in real estate disputes when RERA is silent.

- RERA supplements but does not supplant existing legal frameworks.

- Legal obligations under joint ventures continue despite changes in contractual terms.

Through these stories, we gain not only clarity on specific legal issues but also practical insights into navigating the complexities of real estate law in India.

Footnotes:

- Tejas Shoor vs. Godrej Vestamark LLP: Saket District Court, New Delhi, 2023. For a detailed discussion and further reading on this case, visit: [Saket Court on RERA Act] https://bit.ly/4ep3YM8.

- V.C. Thankamagan vs. K. Ganesh and Anr.: Madras High Court, 2024. This case can be accessed here: https://bit.ly/3TuNqui

- Akshay & Anr. vs. Aditya & Ors.: Supreme Court of India, Civil Appeal Nos.3642-3646/2018, Judgment dated 29.08.2024. The judgment is available for review at [Live Law] - https://bit.ly/4emAIpr.?

These references will help readers delve deeper into the cases, providing a direct link to the judgments and detailed analyses available online.

?