Representation Is Not Enough: Examining The Pervasive Nature Of Anti-Blackness
Janice Gassam Asare, Ph.D.
I help workplaces become anti-racist | DEI Consultant | 2x TEDx Speaker | LinkedIn Top Voice | Jollof rice enthusiast
The world is reeling from body cam footage that was just released of?Tyre Nichols , a 29-year-old driver who was beaten to death by five Memphis police officers. At the time of this article, each of the five officers has been charged with second-degree murder, aggravated assault, two charges of aggravated kidnapping, two charges of official misconduct and one charge of official oppression. It’s important to note that both Nichols and the five officers involved were Black. The speed at which the officers were fired is a topic of conversation on social media, with many commenting on how fast the justice works when the perpetrators are Black. The horrific case of Nichols’ killing points to a phenomenon that deserves further interrogation: representation is not enough. The solution to group homogeneity and a lack of representation isn’t simply to invite more people from underrepresented and marginalized backgrounds in. We don’t talk enough about how those from marginalized communities learn quickly to align themselves with the oppressive class under the false premise that doing so will allow them to shield themselves from harm.
In the last few decades, as a result of the many publicized killings of unarmed Black people, the public discourse has focused on whether there are ways to?reform ?the American policing system. Some opponents of the prison and police abolition movement have suggested that increasing racial diversity on police forces could remedy the racial profiling and discrimination that occurs at a systemic level. But the case of Tyre Nichols provides additional evidence that representation?will not?solve the issue. There has been extensive research on police bias. More than 20 years ago, researchers Joshua Correll, Bernadette Park, Charles M. Judd and Bernd Wittenbrink conducted a?study ?to investigate the decision to shoot or not shoot armed and unarmed targets. Key findings of their research indicate that participants were more likely to shoot a target when he was Black compared to white and that participants were quicker when deciding not to shoot an unarmed white target compared to an unarmed Black target. What was most interesting about their research was that these findings were shown across both white and Black participants. Correll and associates?replicated ?these results with different samples including police officers, community members and college students. In a separate 2019?study ?of fatal police officer-involved shootings, researchers found that Black and Hispanic civilians were more likely to be shot by same-race officers. These studies further elucidate why a focus on diversity and representation will not address the systemic issues that allow anti-blackness to persist.
In the?book ?Caste,?Pulitzer-prize winner writer Isabel Wilkerson?wrote ?“one does not have to be in the dominant caste to do its bidding,” and explains that “the most potent instrument of the caste system is a sentinel at every rung, whose identity forswears any accusation of discrimination and helps keep the caste system humming.” One of the reasons why anti-blackness is so pervasive is because those wielding the sword are often part of oppressed communities themselves. Being able to point to representation as an example of progress or a reason why an environment is safe and should be spared from critique, is one reason why anti-blackness is able to persist.
Many institutions invite people in for the sake of diversity while failing to investigate the root cause of harm. No amount of diversity will fix an institution if the systemic issues are not addressed. What are the ways in which our structures allow anti-blackness to continue? We need to recognize that the presence of Black people alone does not eliminate anti-blackness. Even within Black structures, anti-blackness, class oppression and power differentials prevail. What are the specific ways that your system is holding people accountable for their anti-blackness? Are you assessing anti-blackness at the door? Why are people able to engage in anti-black behaviors in the first place? What questions could be asked to assess inherent anti-black biases when entering an institution? Is there space being provided to have discussions about anti-blackness? Are you offering education so that every individual understands their role in continuing anti-blackness and how it is a global issue that has seen different iterations? How are you helping individuals reckon with their own?internalized ?anti-blackness? Nothing will ever change if 1) we are not examining the specific and nuanced ways that institutions allow anti-blackness to continue and 2) if we fail to put?accountability measures ?in place to address the myriad ways that anti-blackness is perpetuated.
This article was originally published in Forbes .
About The Pink Elephant newsletter:
The Pink Elephant newsletter is a weekly LinkedIn newsletter designed to stimulate critical and relevant dialogue that centers around topics of race and racial equity. If you enjoyed this newsletter, please share with others you feel would gain value from it. If you’d like to get free tips on diversity, equity, and inclusion, sign up for Dr. Janice’s free newsletter through her website . The newsletter is curated by Janice Gassam Asare, Ph.D . who is a writer, TEDx speaker, consultant, educator, and self-proclaimed foodie. Janice is the host of the Dirty Diversity podcast, where she explores diversity, equity and inclusion in more detail. Dr. Janice’s work is centered around the dismantling of oppressive systems while amplifying the voices and needs of the most marginalized folks. If you are seeking guidance and consultation around diversity, equity, and inclusion in your workplace, visit the website to learn more about services that can be tailored to your specific needs or book a FREE 15-minute consultation call to learn more about how your organization or institution can benefit from Dr. Janice’s expertise.
领英推荐
Additional Resources
·?????Schedule a 15-minute “Ask Dr. J” session to answer your racial equity questions
·?????How to Start a DEI Consultancy: Watch the replay now!
·?????Understanding Systemic Racism in the U.S. WEBINARS
·?????My Tips for Aspiring DEI Consultants YOUTUBE VIDEO
·?????Understanding how the White Gaze Shows Up in Your Workplace ARTICLE
Have you read the best-selling book The Pink Elephant CLICK HERE to purchase your copy of Dr. Janice’s best-selling books directly through her website. Grab your copy now. It makes a great gift!
Social Justice Advocate | "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination" -Albert Einstein
6 个月White Supremacy thinks Black representation is enough. Not knowing that anti-Black racism is practiced by all races, even other Black people, in the system of anti-Black white supremacy.
Facilities Management at Roger Williams University
1 年This isn’t locker room talk either, these are real people, compassion has to come first.
Helping Project Managers Balance Work-Life Pressures and Feel More Empowered | Leadership Coach to 1000's | MSc Positive Psychology & Coaching | xIBM | xPwC | ?? to Travel
1 年Such a great point - No amount of diversity will fix an institution if the systemic issues are not addressed. Too many organizations are too focused on counting their diversity progress through skin colour (or the various other metrics focused on). And no real evaluation much less action on the systemic issues.
I'm an aspiring writer/speaker looking to speak about the issues that matter to me, abuse, men's mental health, disability, neurodivergence, racism, sexism, EDI and bringing humanity together, the easy stuff.
1 年If you think that having the same skin tone, body parts or political party as you means that they care about you, wake up and smell the coffee! TONS of white men are in positions of power but I question whether ANY of them care a darn about me.