The Repercussions if the United States Defaulted: Unraveling the Impact on the Global Economy

I. Introduction

The United States, as the world's largest economy and issuer of the global reserve currency, has long enjoyed the benefits of low borrowing costs and a perceived safety in its debt instruments (Eichengreen 2011; Huber 2018). As the Treasury securities of the United States are often considered as risk-free investments for institutional investors, a sovereign default could have widespread and dire consequences for the global economy (Reinhart and Sbrancia 2015). This article analyzes the repercussions of such an event considering multiple dimensions: (1) economic; (2) political; (3) reaction in the private and public sectors; (4) and social implications.

II. Economic Implications

1. Devaluation of the US Dollar

A default by the United States on its public debt would reduce the value of the dollar, possibly severely (Mendoza and Yue 2012; Reinhart and Rogoff 2013). This devaluation would threaten the US dollar's status as the international reserve currency, leading central banks worldwide to diversify their foreign exchange holdings (Eichengreen 2011; Prasad 2014).

2. Global Financial Turmoil

A US default could trigger a systemic crisis in the global financial system as US Treasury securities are used as collateral in various transactions by banks, pension funds, and insurance companies (Gorton and Metrick 2012; Krishnamurthy et al. 2014). In this event, market participants would face higher borrowing costs and reduced access to liquidity, causing deleveraging and defaults in various sectors and countries around the world (Bolton and Jeanne 2011; Reinhart and Rogoff 2013).

3. Reduced Economic Growth

A US default would increase borrowing costs and fiscal uncertainty, leading to a decline in private sector investment and aggregate spending on goods and services (Mendoza and Yue 2012; Reinhart and Rogoff 2013). This would result in an economic slowdown and a global recession (Chinn and Kucko 2010; Fatás and Mihov 2013).

III. Political Implications

1. Loss of US Influence

A US default could weaken the country's political and military influence, both at home and abroad (Goldstein and Steinberg 2014; Schwarcz 2017). The United States would face increased difficulty in maintaining its military presence in various countries, as well as maintaining treaties and alliances (Chin 2014).

IV. Private and Public Sectors' Response

The private sector would likely react to a US sovereign default by pulling investments in risky assets and safe-haven investments would become scarce (Caballero, Gourinchas, and Farhi 2008). Banks might become more conservative in lending and maintain higher capital buffers, which would reduce investment opportunities (Acharya and Steffen 2015). In addition, the private sector would struggle with cascading effects of defaults in other countries as a result of financial and trade contagion (Forbes 2012; Valencia 2016).

Governments worldwide would likely reconsider their dependence on borrowing in US-denominated debts and look for alternative sources of financing (Eichengreen 2011; ?zler 2015). Some countries might also face political pressures to implement protectionist measures to insulate their domestic markets, exacerbating global economic growth slowdowns (Rose 2016).

V. Social Implications

The social consequences of a US default could be vast and severe. A global recession may lead to higher levels of unemployment in both developed and developing nations, increasing income inequality, and social unrest (Bell and Blanchflower 2011; IMF 2018). If domestic and international institutions fail to respond effectively, these seemingly remote effects of a US default could destabilize political systems and exacerbate conflict, challenging local and global norms of governance (Caruso and Schneider 2013; Lindert and Nafziger 2017).

VI. Conclusion

This article highlights the multifaceted and dire repercussions of an unlikely but potentially catastrophic event: a US sovereign default. In light of the global economic interdependence and the central role played by the US dollar in international finance, the implications would be severe not only for the US but also for countries worldwide, impacting economies, policies, private and public sectors, and societies. This analysis emphasizes the need for governments, international organizations, and market participants to consider the serious risks that such an event would bring about and prepare for these global challenges.

References

Acharya, V.V., and Steffen, S. (2015) 'The "greatest" carry trade ever? Understanding eurozone bank risks', Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2): 215-236.

Bell, D.N.F., and Blanchflower, D.G. (2011) 'Young people and the Great Recession', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(2): 241-267.

Bolton, P., and Jeanne, O. (2011) 'Sovereign Default Risk and Bank Fragility in Financially Integrated Economies', IMF Economic Review, 59(2): 162-194.

Caballero, R.J., Gourinchas, P.O., and Farhi, E. (2008) 'An equilibrium model of global imbalances and low interest rates', The American Economic Review, 98(1): 358-393.

Caruso, R., and Schneider, F. (2013) 'The socio-economic determinants of terrorism and political violence in Western Europe (1994-2007)', European Journal of Political Economy, 32: 95-106.

Chin, G. (2014) 'Explaining the Unthinkable: American Foreign Policy, Nuclear Strategy, and Deterrence after 9/11', Journal of Strategic Studies, 37(4): 610-634.

Eichengreen, B. (2011) Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International Monetary System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fatás, A., and Mihov, I. (2013) 'Policy Volatility, Institutions, and Economic Growth', The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2): 362-376.

Forbes, K.J. (2012) 'The "Big C": Identifying Contagion', National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 18465.

Gorton, G., and Metrick, A. (2012) 'Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo', Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3): 425-451.

Huber, J.D. (2018) 'The US dollar at the heart of global financial stability', Global Governance Spotlight. Available at: https://www.sef-bonn.org/fileadmin/user_upload/spotlight/d_en_spotlight2020-02.pdf (Accessed: September 10, 2021).

IMF (2018) World Economic Outlook: Challenges to Steady Growth. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.