Is Regulatory Dominance Really a Risk?
Dr.Aneish Kumar
Ex MD & Country Manager The Bank of New York - India | Non-Executive Director on Corporate Boards | Risk Evangelist I AI Enthusiast | Architect of Strategic Growth and Governance | C-suite mentor
In the worlds of finance, banking, and industry, regulations are like traffic lights—they help keep things in order, ensure fairness, and protect consumers. But what if the lights turn red too often, stopping innovation, progress, and even common sense in their tracks? Could over-regulation be the real risk we need to watch out for?
Let me share a little story to get things going.
A Tale of Two Banks: The Balance Between Innovation and Regulation
Picture this: It’s 2008, right in the middle of the global financial crisis. Two banks, operating in the same market approach the crisis in different ways. One bank, smaller and more innovative, constantly pushes boundaries with new tech and customer-focused services. The other is a traditional, by-the-book giant.
Both banks follow regulations, but it’s the smaller bank that thrives, all thanks to its innovative edge. However, after the crisis, the world’s regulators tightened the noose, and what was once sensible oversight turns into an overwhelming burden. Our innovative little bank, drowning in new rules and the costs of compliance, has to dial back its groundbreaking projects. Meanwhile, the traditional giant—already used to playing by the rules—just keeps on trucking.
Over time, the small bank couldn’t keep up, got buried under compliance costs, and was eventually swallowed up by a larger competitor. Innovation—gone. Why? Because regulatory dominance took over.
So, what is regulatory dominance?
Regulatory dominance happens when rules and oversight overshadow everything else—innovation, common sense, and even market dynamics. It’s when the scales tip, and regulations shift from being a safeguard to a burden.
Yes, we need regulations to keep things fair and transparent. But when they get too heavy, they can smother progress. It’s like trying to run a race with your shoelaces tied together—you’ll get there, but much slower, and it won’t be pretty.
Where is the real risk of regulatory dominance?
So, what happens when regulatory dominance runs unchecked? Let’s break it down.
1. Innovation Gets Stifled
Take the tech industry, for example. Fintech companies are designed to shake up traditional banking systems with new ideas. But in many places, regulators haven’t kept pace with the speed of innovation. Instead, they slap on tough rules that choke these startups. Some of them end up leaving for regions with more relaxed regulations, while others simply go out of business. The result? Innovation suffers, and we lose out on what could’ve been game-changing advancements.
2. Compliance Costs Skyrocket
In industries loaded with regulations, the costs of compliance can be crushing. When businesses are forced to spend more on staying compliant than on research and development, it’s a flashing red warning sign. Startups and smaller companies simply can’t compete with the deep pockets of larger corporations, which leads to monopolies and less competition.
Take the pharmaceutical industry as an example. The process for getting a drug approved is long, expensive, and necessary to ensure safety. But it also raises the bar so high that only a handful of companies can afford to make it through. This limits competition and slows down the release of new treatments.
3. Economic Growth Slows
When regulations get out of hand, investors lose interest. Nobody wants to sink money into a sector where they’ll have to navigate endless red tape just to turn a profit. This is especially true in fast-growing industries like renewable energy. In some countries, it can take years to get approval for a solar project. By the time the green light is given, the technology may be outdated, and the opportunity wasted.
领英推荐
4. Regulatory Arbitrage
When things get too strict, companies often look for ways out—like moving to friendlier regulatory climates. It’s called regulatory arbitrage. Businesses shift operations to countries with more lenient rules, which may be good for them in the short term but can devastate the economies they leave behind. Take the cryptocurrency industry, for example. Many firms have relocated to regions with lighter regulations after facing tough scrutiny in their home countries. The result? Lost innovation and lost jobs for the overly regulated areas.
How to prevent regulatory dominance from becoming a risk?
Is it all doom and gloom? Not really. Here are a few ways we can keep regulations in check without stifling innovation:
1. Adaptive Regulations
Regulations need to evolve with the times. Governments and regulators should work closely with industries to understand what’s new and adjust the rules accordingly. Regulatory sandboxes are a great example. These are controlled spaces where businesses can test new ideas with less regulatory burden while still protecting consumers. It’s the perfect mix of innovation and oversight.
2. Proportional Regulation
Let’s face it: A small startup shouldn’t have to jump through the same hoops as a multinational corporation. Regulations should be proportionate to the size and risk level of the business. By scaling the rules appropriately, we can encourage growth without sacrificing safety or fairness.
3. Collaboration is the key
Regulators and businesses need to stop seeing each other as opponents. Instead, they should work together to create a regulatory environment that fosters both innovation and risk management. This way, we can avoid regulatory capture, where industries have too much influence over the rules, making them lopsided in their favour.
4. Foster Competition
Governments can help keep competition alive by offering incentives for smaller players, like tax breaks or simplified compliance processes. This levels the playing field and prevents regulatory dominance from crushing competition.
5. Regular review of regulations
What worked 10 years ago might not work today, especially in industries like tech and finance. Regular reviews of regulations ensure they stay relevant and don’t become too dominant.
Conclusion: Finding the Right Balance
Regulatory dominance is real, and yes, it’s a risk. But with the right approach, it doesn’t have to be a deal-breaker. The key is balance. We need to foster an environment where regulations protect and guide without stifling innovation. Our rules must adapt to a changing world and not stand in its way.
In the end, it’s about creating a future where industries can thrive, innovate, and grow—without being held back by outdated or overly rigid regulations. So, as the world continues to evolve, let’s make sure our regulations do the same.
Head Treasury Product APAC - GPS at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Treasury Product Management Expert
2 个月Well articulated and your Conclusion says it all - Regulations and Innovation - it is not one for the other. Collaboration between Industry bodies and the Regulators combined with self regulation is critical. constant engagement with Regulators on evolving market dynamics is the key for a safe but constant innovative world
Great article! It’s crucial to find the right balance between regulation and innovation. Over-regulation can indeed stifle growth, but thoughtful, adaptive frameworks can drive both fairness and progress. What strategies do you think could help in creating a more flexible regulatory environment that supports innovation while ensuring security and transparency?
Risk, Audit, Compliance, Governance Leader | Qualified Independent Director | Board of Governor - IIA, Mumbai, India
2 个月From risk standpoint, the uncertainty regards to direction of regulatory changes is key risk. Too frequent contradictory changes or reversals makes factoring the risk very difficult.
Chief Representative at Wells Fargo Bank N.A, India
2 个月Insightful ??