Reform This ONE Recruitment Policy to Advance Fairness in Hiring
Jenn Tardy
??LinkedIn Top Voice | Diversity Recruitment Training & Consulting | ??I help workplaces increase diversity and retention WITHOUT harm. ??
??This is #IncreaseDiversity, a weekly newsletter + monthly workshop series sharing best practices for employers who want to implement effective diversity recruitment programs. To see previous editions, visit JenniferTardy.com. | IG: @IncreaseDiversity ??
News From #TeamJTC:
???? Free Checklist. We have a FREE, downloadable CHECKLIST for leaders called The Platinum Checklist for Hiring Professionals: 10 Immediate Actions Leaders Must STOP Doing in Order to Increase Diversity. Click to download your free copy.
Performative recruiting happens all the time. When I am coaching job seekers, I often tell them to NOT apply to positions that are posted and remain open less than a week. There is likely someone already identified for that role and there is an even higher likelihood that it will be a complete waste of your time.
Do you remember the article when we talked about the difference between a workplace ideal and a workplace reality? Here is another example.
Workplace Ideal: “We post ALL open positions.”
Workplace Reality: An applicant has already been designated for the open position but needs to appear to go through the hiring process before receiving a job offer.
Here is what you need to know: Performative recruiting dismantles the trust that applicants (+ employees) have in your candidate selection and interviewing process.
Do you know when performative recruiting happens most frequently? The four most common moments are:
#1: When converting contractors into full-time employees.
#2: When converting interns into full-time employees.
#3: When referrals are submitted.
#4: When talent planning (i.e., succession and high potential talent programs).
Leaders, your intentions are good. After all, you have individuals who have—to some degree—been vetted as solid workers. This vetting process may happen informally in various ways:
- An individual has worked in a contingent capacity, like an intern or contractor and you have been able to see their performance.
- They have worked in an employee capacity and have demonstrated high performance, like many who are on succession plans and in high potential programs.
- They are referrals, and a current employee can vouch for their work ethic.
I get it. Identification of top talent is key.
But where things tend to go amiss, is when we move away from identifying top talent for a candidate pool as a core philosophy and policy to designating a candidate for a role. Do you see the difference? When you designate a candidate for a role, it does not matter if other competitive candidates apply, the role has already been slotted for the designee.
To advance fairness in hiring, reform your hiring policy. Establish a rule that no one is designated for a role. To be considered, all contractors, interns, referrals, and individuals mapped to talent plans must apply and be fairly assessed using selection criteria like all candidates in the candidate pool.
These individuals should not be designated or slotted for a role without being fully assessed just like the rest of the candidate pool. If they are truly the most competitive, they will rise to the top during the standard hiring process. This allows applicants who self-nominate by applying to a role to also be fairly assessed, and it gives them a fair chance to be considered for the role.
Here is something ELSE you need to know: If you are not careful, intentional, and consistently checking candidate data, performative recruiting can ALSO preserve underrepresentation. If there is a lack of diversity among your contractors, interns, referrals, and employees who have been identified on succession and high potential plans, this preserves underrepresentation. This happens when, for example, an all-White talent pipeline continues to get first dibs at your workplace’s open opportunities. It may be unintentional, but it still preserves underrepresentation, nonetheless.
Remember this: Everyone should apply to all internally and externally posted positions. That includes:
- Employees who self-nominate as being ready now
- External applicants who are referred or self-nominated as being ready now
- Contingent staff (i.e., contractors and interns) vying for employee opportunities
- Employees who have been identified via talent programs (i.e., high potential and succession planning)
Change this one policy and you will be well on your way to moving from performative recruiting to building an equitable and fair hiring strategy.
Join us in the comments section: Have you observed any additional examples of performative recruiting? If so, share below.
????Check out our Increase Diversity 101 Virtual Workshop Series.
?We will use the weekly #IncreaseDiversity newsletter platform to do five things:
● Challenge organizations to dig more deeply when it comes to diversity recruiting and retention programs
● Clarify misconceptions or demystify complex topics related to diversity recruiting
● Share best practices in diversity recruiting and retention
● Answer frequently asked questions related to diversity recruiting and retention
● Build a safe learning community for hiring professionals
? Need support implementing an effective diversity recruiting program at your organization? Visit me and learn about our flagship Diversity Magnet Recruiter Bootcamp + Diversity Recruitment Consulting Services.
The client of government is we the people.
3 年One time I thought it might be a performative hire (great phrase thank you) and I just simply asked before applying. That won’t always be appropriate for the situation and you might not get a truthful answer but just throwing that option out there. It worked for me, and I was hired so they didn’t hold the question against me.
CGA/CFGA-Certified General Adjuster- NFIP Flood Certified, Self-appointed 620 All Lines Adjuster, ACA, Daily/ CAT, Pre-litigation Adjuster II.
3 年Well said.
Great article Jenn. Practical tips that really do work if implemented properly. Pressure seems to be on employers to improve development of their staff and promote within and you can understand why an organisation would want to promote rather than lose a great employee. That said, i do agree with you that if the internal candidate rises to the top through a thorough and robust process this will be much more gratifying for both the employer and the employee!
Learning and Inclusion Specialist
3 年This is so interesting because looking back, I realize I have been hired before using this method of performative recruiting. I even proposed a new department at one org with me as the new manager and was approved (I was already doing the work and it was a growing org). I have also seen instances when positions are created because an org wants a specific person to work with them. As a recipient of the practice, I now wonder if others looked down on me because of the way I was hired. Thank you for helping us improve!
HR/Diversity Equity, Inclusion Belonging Manager (DEIB) at Legal Services NYC
3 年Another example of this would be many newly created DEI jobs that appeared a year ago. Despite many people applying, six months later, those same jobs were again relisted as though they were new jobs. Qualified candidates who applied were often told their salary requirements were “too high.” If this isn’t performative recruiting, I don’t know what is. Thanks for coining the term Dr. Jenn Tardy.