Reflections on the infographic: Spirituality or a Way of Being?
Evelien Verschroeven
Accelerating Learning & Innovation with BOBIP | Expert in Relational Cognition & Knowledge Building | Helping Organizations Unlock Their Full Potential ??
Today, I revisited this post, and a few spontaneous thoughts and reflections came to mind...
This doesn't mean I don't find this infographic beautiful—quite the opposite! It inspired me to dig deeper into my own experiences to see which other ways of being I know could also fit beautifully within this framework.
When we encounter philosophies like Ubuntu, Sumak Kawsay, or Ifa, the question arises: do we see them as ethical guidelines, integrated ways of being, or as spirituality?
The infographic primarily describes these frameworks as relational and caring principles—systems focused on autonomy, reciprocity, and harmony. But how does our own cultural lens influence this interpretation?
In Western traditions, where spirituality is often separated from the practical and material, there is a tendency to reduce these concepts to ethics or social systems. But is that really the case? Or do they embody a way of living in which the boundaries between the spiritual, practical, and social dissolve?
Why are some frameworks missing? What stood out to me is that the additional frameworks I’ve mentioned—such as Ifa, Nkwam, Banana philosophy, and Tule—are often described in the literature as "spiritual traditions." This made me wonder if that’s why they were not included in the original list. Are we inclined to exclude certain philosophies when they are explicitly described as spiritual? And how do we make that distinction? Or is spirituality sometimes overlooked precisely because of our focus on social or ethical dimensions?
For example:
领英推荐
How do we learn from existing frameworks? Perhaps we don’t need to search for new answers but rather focus on rediscovering existing frameworks, such as:
These philosophies offer valuable lessons about interconnectedness and harmony. How do we adopt these insights without reducing or distorting them?
A Call to Reflect
What lens are we using to view these frameworks? Are we guided by our separations between ethics and spirituality?
This is an invitation to reconsider how we understand these frameworks. Are they ethical systems, spiritual frameworks, or simply integrated ways of being? And how can we respectfully apply this wisdom to guide us toward a more connected, harmonious existence?
Anthropologist of an Ecosocial Transition (Sustainability & Wellbeing) | Transdisciplinary Researcher | Creating Meaningful Synergies | Paradoxical Thinker | Essayist |
1 个月The big difference between those cultures and our "ethics" is probably that they were more collective, while we (Western Worldview) take the "individual" as our main framework. Maybe my answer is to apply that "individuality" to the Yellow Worldview of Spiral Dynamics. The liminality between Yellow and Turquoise (Collective) seems quite similar because they are in another cycle. https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/everything-everywhere-all-once-feminine-multiverse-mart%25C3%25ADn-gonz%25C3%25A1lez-m5o7e/?trackingId=WbqD1WuEQQCbKz4YVoZdSg%3D%3D
Accelerating Learning & Innovation with BOBIP | Expert in Relational Cognition & Knowledge Building | Helping Organizations Unlock Their Full Potential ??
1 个月Katie Archer Olson, EdD Carmen V.