Rediscovering Agility: Moving Beyond Dogma
Over the last year, I've noticed more and more the posts carrying titles such as "Agile is dead" and how LinkedIn's AI generated questions appear to be seeded with the typical misunderstandings that frustrate many Agile practitioners across various industries.
The aim of this article is to try and encourage the same "inspect and adapt" culture that we promote to the uninitiated and hold a mirror up to ourselves to see how we can get back to the roots of Agility.
The Rise and Fall of "Agile"
Over the past decade, Agile methodologies and frameworks have revolutionised how teams across various industries approach software development and project management. From its inception, Agile promised a more adaptive, customer-centric way of working, grounded in the principles of the Agile Manifesto. However, as Agile has become more widespread, there has been an unfortunate shift towards dogmatic adherence to specific practices and frameworks. This shift threatens to undermine the very flexibility and responsiveness that Agile was designed to promote.
The Agile Manifesto: A Refresher
To understand where we have strayed, we need to revisit the Agile Manifesto itself. Created in 2001 by a group of seventeen thought leaders in software development, the manifesto outlines four core values and twelve principles aimed at fostering better ways of developing software. The core values are:
These values emphasise flexibility, collaboration, and responsiveness - qualities that should define any truly agile organisation.
The Drift Towards Dogma
Despite the clear and flexible guidelines of the Agile Manifesto, the Agile community has seen a trend towards rigid interpretations and implementations. Popular frameworks like Scrum, SAFe, and Kanban have provided structured approaches to Agility, but they have also contributed to a more prescriptive and, at times, inflexible application of Agile principles. Teams and organisations often feel compelled to follow these frameworks to the letter, losing sight of the underlying principles that made them effective to begin with.
领英推荐
For instance, the Scrum framework's accountabilities, events, and artifacts can often be applied in a way that stifles innovation and adaptation. How many of us have been witness to "zombie scrum"? Attending a daily scrum just to hear a 60 second status update followed with "no blockers". Similarly, large-scale implementations like SAFe can become bureaucratic, undermining the nimbleness that Agile aims to foster. This dogmatic approach can lead to a checkbox mentality where the focus shifts from delivering value to merely following processes.
Finding Our Way Back
To reclaim the true spirit of Agility, perhaps we need to focus on the foundational values and principles outlined in the Agile Manifesto. We can discuss these within our organisations without simply reciting the Agile Manifesto (which can often induce a few eye-rolls), for example:
These talking points still embrace the language and the intent of the Agile Manifesto, but still invite inspection and criticism which is needed to discover what works for your teams' specific needs.
Conclusion
The Agile Manifesto was designed to offer a flexible, human-centred approach to software development and project management. By reconnecting with its core values and principles, we can move beyond the dogma that has crept into the Agile world and return to a more adaptive, responsive, and value-driven way of working.
This isn't to say that frameworks aren't useful - I've continuously used them in my career to manage projects and align people around delivering value - but they shouldn't be used as the measuring stick for Agility.
Let's get back to being agile rather than doing agile.
Building solutions for people through collaboration and a focus on human experience.
8 个月Absolutely… although I think most of the “Agile is dead” posts are actually just clickbait to bring people to the same realization.