Redefining Power Play: The China-India Trade Odyssey
Vivek Viswanathan
|Business Analyst|, More then 10yrs experience |Global Transaction Banking|, |Wealth Management|, |Treasury & Capital Markets|, |Banking Operations|,| Credit|,| Risk Management| |Trade Finance|, |Business Analysis|,|AI|
Ever wondered how political clashes might redefine the economic contours of two of the world's LARGEST economies? ???????? Buckle up, because I've delved deep into the intricate trade web between China and India, two powerhouses that are constantly making headlines.
From lopsided trade to a strategic dance of protectionism, tariffs, and tech, their dynamic can influence the global market pulse in ways we might not even realize yet. ?? Whether you're an economist, investor, or just a curious mind, this is something you DON'T want to miss.
1. Background and Context:
India and China, two of the world's largest economies, have a longstanding political and territorial dispute, leading to clashes in 2020, 2021, and 2022.
Despite these tensions, trade remains vital, especially for India.
2. Trade Dynamics:
Skewed Trade Balance: 87% of the $117 billion trade in 2022 originated from China, indicating a substantial trade deficit for India. China primarily exports tech-intensive goods (memory chips, integrated circuits, pharmaceutical ingredients) to India. In contrast, India primarily exports resources and primary goods like crustaceans, cotton, granite, diamonds, and petrol to China.
3. India's Efforts to Reduce Dependency:
Motivation: Strategic and commercial interests drive India's push to reduce dependency on China. On the strategic side, dependence on an unpredictable adversary poses risks. Commercially, India aims to capture a share of the business that currently goes to China.
Protectionist Measures:
Licensing Restrictions: India announced new licensing requirements for imported PCs and laptops, primarily affecting Chinese imports. Similar considerations are ongoing for cameras and printers.
Banning Products and Apps: Following border hostilities, India banned numerous Chinese apps citing national security concerns.
Tariffs: India has raised tariffs on various products like mobile phones and toys, which are primarily imported from China.
Bureaucratic Barriers: The Indian government has weaponized bureaucracy against Chinese firms. Investigations, complex tax rules, and allegations of non-compliance have increased friction.
FDI Restrictions: A new regulation requires special approvals for investments from border-sharing countries, mainly targeted at China. This has substantially reduced the number of approved Chinese investments.
Licensing Regime: Only a fraction of Chinese investments have been approved. Chinese firms are reportedly facing unspoken bans and restrictions in setting up new facilities in India.
Incentives for Domestic Production: The Indian government is trying to boost local manufacturing in areas dominated by Chinese imports. Examples include:
A $33 billion program for "production-linked incentives" targeting 14 areas primarily dominated by Chinese firms.
Incentives to manufacture pharmaceutical ingredients domestically.
Contract manufacturers like Foxconn and Pegatron are incentivized to nurture local suppliers in India.
4. Response of Chinese Firms:
Exits: Some firms like Great Wall Motors have closed operations due to challenges in securing local approvals.
Adaptations: Firms like Xiaomi are focusing on localizing production and expanding exports. Shein plans to re-enter India in collaboration with Indian conglomerate Reliance.
5. Global Implications:
Shift in Trade Dynamics: The ongoing tensions and India's protectionist stance might lead to a shift in trade dynamics. If India successfully reduces its dependence on China, other nations might follow suit.
Global Supply Chain: As India offers incentives for domestic manufacturing, global firms might consider diversifying their supply chain by investing in India.
Protectionism as a Trend: With two major economies resorting to protectionism, other nations might adopt similar strategies either due to geopolitical reasons or to protect and nurture domestic industries.
Potential for Diplomatic Spillover: Continued trade tensions can spill over into broader diplomatic and geopolitical arenas, potentially influencing alignments and partnerships.
In conclusion, while the developments in Sino-Indian trade relations are bilateral in nature, their implications are global. The protectionist measures, if prolonged and expanded, could reshape global trade dynamics and supply chains, potentially ushering in an era where countries are more guarded about their economic interdependencies.