Red Hat OpenShift vs. VMware Tanzu Kubernetes Grid: Which is the better Enterprise Container Orchestration Platform for Cluster Deployment?

When it comes to enterprise container orchestration platforms, there are two clear leaders: Red Hat #openshift and VMware #tanzu Kubernetes Grid. In this article, we'll compare these two platforms side-by-side, looking at a range of features and capabilities.

Cluster Provisioning

One of the key benefits of using a container orchestration platform is the ability to easily provision and manage Kubernetes clusters. OpenShift delivers this through a combination of its Ansible-based installation process and integrations with a range of public and private cloud providers. This makes it ideal for those looking to deploy a hybrid or multi-cloud Kubernetes environment.

In contrast, Tanzu Kubernetes Grid is primarily designed for deployment on vSphere and other VMware infrastructure. This makes it a good choice for those looking for tight integration with other VMware products. However, it should be noted that Tanzu Kubernetes Grid can also be deployed on a range of other infrastructure, including public clouds, bare-metal, and other private data center environments.

Cluster Upgrades

Another key area of focus for any container orchestration platform is the ability to easily upgrade Kubernetes clusters. OpenShift uses the Kubernetes Cluster API to automate the process of upgrading clusters, making it a good choice for those looking for a fully automated solution. Tanzu Kubernetes Grid also uses the Kubernetes Cluster API to automate upgrades, but doesn't offer the same level of integration with other VMware products.

Multi-cluster Management

With the release of OpenShift 4, Red Hat introduced support for multi-cluster management through its hybrid cloud console. This makes it a good choice for those looking to manage multiple Kubernetes clusters, whether they're running on public clouds, private data centers, or a combination of both. Tanzu Kubernetes Grid also supports multi-cluster management, but doesn't offer the same level of integration with VMware products.

Monitoring and Operations Management

Another important consideration when choosing a container orchestration platform is the level of monitoring and management capabilities it offers. OpenShift comes with a range of diagnostic tools that can be used to collect health statistics, as well as integrations with Prometheus and Grafana for environment health monitoring and visualization. Tanzu Kubernetes Grid doesn't offer built-in monitoring capabilities, but is compatible with Prometheus and other Grafana-based solutions.

Conclusion

Both OpenShift and Tanzu Kubernetes Grid offer a range of features and capabilities that make them well-suited for enterprise container orchestration. However, there are some key differences between the two platforms that should be considered when making a decision. OpenShift is a good choice for those looking for a platform that is easy to install and manage, with good integration with a range of public and private cloud providers. Tanzu Kubernetes Grid is a good choice for those looking for tight integration with VMware products, or for those looking to deploy Kubernetes on a range of infrastructure.

Fonicom is a multi-disciplinary Systems Integrator and Managed Services Provider. We provide containerization solutions that are tailored to each client's unique needs.