What "How Brands Grow" gets wrong about loyalty programmes

What "How Brands Grow" gets wrong about loyalty programmes

Byron Sharp’s book?“How Brands Grow” scientifically challenges many accepted views of marketing and appears to suggest that loyalty programmes are a waste of time. ?

?He argues :

?1. Loyalty schemes have minimal impact: They are inefficient and expensive?in terms of driving sales growth and do not significantly influence the behaviour of regular customers. If a hotel or brand operates a loyalty programme, it mainly rewards guests who would have stayed with them anyway.

2. New buyers are more important than existing ones The success of a brand depends on appealing to new users as well as a broad base of?light or occasional buyers”. If you acquire new customers, the loyalty of existing customers simultaneously increases and so regular guests/customers should not be overly nurtured because they tend to be loyal regardless.

3. Deep customer loyalty Is hokum: While buyers and guests display varying degrees of loyalty to brands, deep loyalty to a product or brand is exceptionally rare. The very best customers of one brand are , very often, the best customers of its competitor.

He proves that brand growth comes from attracting new customers and this arises from a combination of a brand’s “Physical Availability” (ie how present is it, how easy is it to find and buy), “Mental Availability – how aware are customers and prospective customers of it, especially when they are in purchase mode, how distinctive and easy to recall is it) and its Competitiveness on the attributes that matter to customers (eg price, quality).

Everything in How Brand’s Grow resonates with my (decades of) experience in launching, developing and promoting brands at P&G, Pepsico, Barilla, Tesco, Asda and many others. The evidential, science based approach is compelling. The brands with the highest market penetration (ie success in attracting new users) also have the highest loyalty (ie customer frequency and spend). Small brands have fewer customers and these customers are less loyal. There are next to no examples of brands with high loyalty and low penetration. ??

So why would anyone launch or maintain a loyalty programme ?

Because loyalty programmes are not just about loyalty.

They contribute to brand growth exactly as Byron Sharp prescribes – they build mental availability (and sometimes physical availability), they increase a brand’s competitiveness, they also, importantly, enable a brand to better understand its existing and prospective audience and customer base and they can be inherently profitable and valuable in their own right.

Loyalty programmes build physical availability when they act as another channel through which a customer can transact. Many an airline loyalty app is a high value distribution point for car rental and hotel brands and vice versa.

They build mental availability when attached to customer's phones, key fobs, home screens or wallets. Tesco Clubcard, BA/Avios and Sainsburys/Nectar’s distinctive colours and logos are imprinted in millions of memory structures throughout the day. Terry Leahy said that around the world, "Clubcard was more famous than Tesco".

A good loyalty programme will not make an uncompetitive brand competitive. Price, flavour, service, quality – the brand promise or proposition - are all important aspects. It doesn’t matter how many shops you have if you are miles out on price and you are going to lose lots more customers if your competition suddenly builds a much better mousetrap.

In their heyday, Tesco did not expect Clubcard to drive loyalty. Executing the 5 brand promises were what mattered. ?This meant (lots of) stores in the right locations (physical availability), product availability (“I can get what I want”), attractive pricing (“the prices are good”), service (“the staff are friendly”), easy to shop (“the aisles are clear”) and not having to queue (“I don’t have to queue”).

Clubcard drove mental availability via millions of cards in wallets, on key fobs and phone home screens. It created differentiation and distinctiveness and attracted millions of new customers.

Tesco saw Clubcard as a marketing platform through which it could say thank you to customers and especially a vehicle for understanding them. If you want to sell pet food or nappies it helps to know who has a pet or a baby. If you want to find new customers, it helps to know more about your existing ones. ?If you need to communicate to customers it helps to have their permission to be contacted, if you want to sell new services eg phones, insurance, it helps to have marketing permission to do so.

Latterly, the introduction of Clubcard prices has helped Tesco recapture some of the share lost to discounters and has undoubtedly attracted new users motivated by the big savings on offer. Clubcard has improved Tesco’s competitiveness vs the discounters and Asda’s decision to launch their Rewards programme recognised that without one, their overall proposition was diminished.

Loyalty programmes can also be inherently profitable in their own right. The two largest coalition loyalty programmes in Europe, Nectar and PAYBACK continue to thrive under new owners over twenty years since their inception, both having been sold for £ hundred’s of millions.

British Airway’s Avios programme generates £1 million per day for British Airways – all totally incremental to the profits derived from flying planes. Other airlines have been bankrolled by their highly profitable loyalty programmes.

The first party, permissioned, data that loyalty programmes generate is also highly monetizable as the growth in retail media attests. On track for over $200 billion of incremental profit for retailer’s with loyalty programmes.

So, yes, it is possible to be an advocate of “How Brand’s Grow” (so much so, that I have signed up for the HBG for Executives Course in Bordeaux in June – watch this space for more) as well as being an advocate for loyalty programmes (so much so that I founded a company that advises on how to build, optimise and monetise them).

Loyalty programmes help brands to grow. They drive physical availability, mental availability and build competitiveness. They can be inherently profitable and their data is highly monetizable.

Loyalty programme owners should similarly follow the How Brands Grow marketing science. If you want to grow a loyalty programme you have to acquire new members, that requires physical availability and presence wherever the loyalty programme operates. It has to be easy to join. You have to regularly remind new members about the programme and have distinctive, memorable brand assets that trigger “mental availability”, you have to be competitive on the attributes that matter to loyalty aficionados – recognition, rewards, emotional and transactional benefits. ?

Back in the day, over a million customers defected from Sainsburys to Tesco when Avios switched allegiance from Sainsburys to Tesco.

How about that for customer acquisition and brand growth.


#byronsharp #howbrandsgrow #loyaltyprogrammes #loyaltyprograms #retailmedia #EhrenbergBassInstitute #Nectar360 #Clubcard #dunnhumby #LSEleven #Avios #PAYBACK

Ibrahim Shefik

creator, innovator, entrepreneur

3 个月

I'm looking to explore a gap In the market. Following my recent experience in b2c in a competitive broadband sector I was enlightened and suprised by the incompetence shown by major suppliers such as b.t, virgin media and sky on how bad their retentions schemes are, how outdated, un-passionate, demotivated the systemic departments are. I found it so easy to move subscribers over to my product that I represent because of the lacklustre effort shown in retaining the customers service. I want to implement a system, systematic in reconnecting with exsisting customers a month out of end of contract to help, recreate the excitement first created when signing, with a deal worthy of renewal. Not only the offers given to new customers that more or more existing customers are fed up of learning that new subscribers are offered better deals. I would hope to connect with you, for your expertise and knowledge and guidance.

回复
Daniel Rodriguez

CPG | LATAM & Caribbean Business Development | Digital Marketing | Trade Marketing | Distributor Management

4 个月

Well said Steve In Latin America, loyalty seems to be shifting, especially with the rise of low-cost channels like Supermercaods DIA and Tiendas ARA in Colombia, which are gaining market share from larger stores like Grupo Exito. In my opinion, supermarkets now serve as mere transactional platforms, and loyalty programs will only succeed if they genuinely serve customers better than the competition and resonate with them. Even high-income individuals are opting for these low-cost options to save money. Additionally, online shopping from supermarkets an online supermarkets is on the rise, further changing consumer behaviors. Legacy consumers still visiting supermarkets might be more open to loyalty programs if they offer significant rewards or discounts. The real value lies in the data these programs can provide, helping retailers and manufacturers understand consumers holistically and succeed in the market.

Filiberto Amati

From Insight to Strategy to Growth Delivered in CPG, FMCG, Wines & Spirits, Food & Beverages | Brand | Marketing | Exports | Innovation | Internationalization | Board Advisor | NED | Coach | Mentor

5 个月

Great insights. Consumers see loyalty on the bonding level and are driven by experiences, whereas many companies limit themselves to and focus only on the transactional part. As long as the two definitions are out of sync, loyalty, and reward systems will stay broken. I disagree that new buyers are more critical than existing ones. That really depends on the acquisition costs and the lifetime value of the buyer, and the industry and the category play a role. Even within consumer goods, food, and beverage, that will ultimately depend on purchase frequency and penetration dynamics.

回复
Rob Clements

?? Customer ?? Engagement

5 个月

It is fundamental to understand these arguments and raises the bar that benefits everyone. I do think the debate on FMCG/CPG growth from penetration (acquisition) being more important than existing customers (retention) is still under researched. Likely due to the challenges academics would have sourcing propriety data and retailers not really having an incentive to participate. A major change since that book launched has been the growth of CPG engagement programs. This also gives us more answers and more questions on this topic!

Ishu Bansal

Optimizing logistics and transportation with a passion for excellence | Building Ecosystem for Logistics Industry | Analytics-driven Logistics

6 个月

Innovative How can brands effectively balance the principles of brand growth and customer loyalty programs?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了