Hierarchy of References for Offshore Substation Facility in the US OCS

Hierarchy of References for Offshore Substation Facility in the US OCS

Hierarchy of References for Offshore Substation Facility by Shashikant Sarada @WSP USA

Selecting a set of standards for offshore wind farm development in the US can be a complex process. According to current regulations, offshore wind developers in the US are required take a "design basis approach," rather than following a prescribed set of standards. This means that it is up to the developer to propose a coherent set of standards that are best suited to meet the project needs, equivalent to existing regulatory requirements for similar applications, and based on the principle of the best available and safest economically feasible technologies (BAST). It's important to note that there may be standards prescribed in other CFRs that are applicable to an offshore wind project.

When planning offshore wind projects and selecting standards, it may be helpful to consider the hierarchy of references illustrated above. It's worth noting that in this hierarchy, design standards due to Project Certification are listed after International Standards because Project Certification is not a regulatory requirement in the US. The scope of Project Certification is slightly different than verification by a Certified Verification Agent (CVA), which is mandated by 30 CFR 585.

Once the hierarchy of references has been discussed and agreed upon, project discipline leads should use the hierarchy to identify the set of standards to be included as part of the design basis. For example, here's a working example of how to select a coherent set of design standards for the fire protection discipline.

Standards Hierarchy for Fire Protection and Technical Safety by Shashikant Sarada @WSP USA

Please use the comment section below for any feedback/comments OR please feel free to email at Shashikant.SaradaATwsp.com or Stephan.SchwabATwsp.com. Thank you.

Update history:

2021-03-09: First published.

2021-10-24: Revised illustration to include reference to NFPA 850. NFPA 850 provides recommended practice for various types of fire protection systems that may be used.?

2022-08-04: Revised illustration and corrected some typos.

Slawomir Mandrek

Principal Specialist

3 年

Hello. I believe that the fire detection should be clearly noticed. The table ain the article exclude the FD as a part of FSS. Only passive protection is assigned to this IMO regulation, I guess intentionally. It would be valuable to stress which regulations should be or are proposed to used as guidelines for the fire detection.

回复
Mariana Coelho

M.Sc. Naval Architect & Marine Engineer | Subsea Engineer | Six Sigma Black Belt | MBA

3 年

Good summary Shashikant. I appreciate it, as I am trying to understand more about this area. ????

Graeme Pirie

Vice President at DNV

3 年

It's a very good comprehensive summary Shashi, thanks for preparing and sharing.

Won Ho Lee, PE, PMP

Offshore wind | Technical support | Training | Structural integrity | DNV

3 年

Hi Shashikant, well summarized! Basically generally accepted industry standards and practices according to 30 CFR will be accepted by BOEM.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Shashikant Sarada MS, PE, PMP的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了