Reasons for omissions in ESRS
Mirka Plevova
Sustainability reporting made simple | ESRS & EU Taxonomy | GRI | ISSB | Views are my own
Companies that prepare their sustainability statement in accordance with ESRS need to report information on all their material sustainability matters as required by the relevant ESRS disclosure requirements or if applicable, provide entity-specific disclosures.
There are however situations when required information doesn’t need to be reported, i.e. it can be omitted. Such situations are also known as “reasons for omissionsâ€.
What are the reasons for omissions in ESRS?
Omissions due to confidentiality constraints
? Disclosure of classified or sensitive information and information on intellectual property, know-how or results of innovation (additional rules apply - see ESRS 1 par. 105 - 108)
Use of this omission needs to be reported as part of the disclosure requirement BP-1 par. 5 d).
The company should make every reasonable effort to ensure that beyond the omission of a specific piece of information due to its secret nature, the overall relevance of the disclosure in question is not impaired (ESRS 1 par. 108).
? Disclosure of information related to impending developments or matters in the course of negotiation may be omitted in exceptional cases (additional rules apply - see par. 19a(3) or 29a(3) of CSRD).?
?This option only exists if the Member State included it in the local legislation when transposing CSRD.
Use of this omission needs to be reported as part of the disclosure requirement BP-1 par. 5 e).
Information is not available?
? Disclosure of information related to policies, actions and targets.?
Where policies, actions and targets do not exist because they have not been adopted, implemented or set, the company must provide the reason for why this is the case and it may provide a time horizon in which it plans to adopt them.
? Disclosure of information on processes for engaging affected stakeholders about impacts and on processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected stakeholders to raise concern.
This applies to disclosure requirements of the topical standards related to the own workforce (S1-2, S1-3), workers in the value chain (S2-2, S2-3), affected communities (S3-2, S3-3) and consumers and end-users (S4-2, S4-3).
领英推è
Where these processes do not exist because the company has not adopted them, the company needs to disclose that this is the case and it may provide a time horizon in which it plans to adopt them. The company is not required to provide reason for not having adopting the processes.
? Disclosure of information on transition plan for climate change mitigation (E1-1).
If the company has not adopted a transition plan for climate change mitigation, it should nevertheless disclose whether it will adopt it in the future and if yes, provide a time horizon.
Information is not material
? Disclosure of information required by the disclosure requirement related to metrics (including its individual data points) does not need to reported if the information is not material (ESRS 1 par. 34).
?If omitted information relates to an EU law data point, the company will indicate that such data point is “Not material†as part of its table of all EU law data points required by IRO-2 par. 56 instead of providing a reference to its sustainability statement.?
For a list of data points derived from other EU legislation refer to ESRS 2 Appendix B.
There is no requirement to provide a list of other metrics (or individual data points) which are not reported because they have been assessed as not-material.
The company does not need to provide any rationale why not reported metrics (or data points) are not material but it must provide an explanation of how material information has been determined including the use of thresholds (see IRO-2 par. 59).
What if information to be reported is not complete or is inaccurate?
?As opposed to GRI Standards, ESRS do not allow omissions of information which is incomplete or inaccurate.
For example, the company might not be able to collect all the necessary information about its upstream and downstream value chain even after making reasonable effort. In that case, the company should estimate all the required information, for example with the use of sector-average data and other proxies (ESRS 1 par. 69).
It is however important to note that all reported information (including estimations) must meet the qualitative characteristics of information (see ESRS 1 Appendix B).
For example, disclosure of financial effects from material opportunities (disclosure requirements E1-9, E2-6, E3-5, E4-5, E5-6) are not required if the disclosure does not meet the qualitative characteristics of information.
Sustainability & Business Strategy Manager @ Accenture
6 个月Thank you for this article. Great summary. I would be interested to know your opinion on deciding whether a data point is material when we speak about metrics. If we look at Annex E - Flowchart for determining disclosures under ESRS it gives us the option to respond to the question 'Is the data point material?' Now the double materiality analysis (DMA) is not carried out at this level of detail. We can easily decide which Disclosure Requirements are material based on the results of the DMA, but on the individual data point I feel it leaves the flexibility to choose. As you already explained, it's not mandatory to justify why you don't report on some data points if are related to non-material topics. But what would be a minimum threshold to help choose what data points are material? Thank you!
?? Our tools help accountants branch into sustainability reporting
11 个月Peer pressure is going to play a big role here. If we take chemical companies as an example, many of them have chosen not to disclose Scope 3 - Category 10 because “it’s too difficult to quantifyâ€. But then many of their peers do disclose this category and it turns out to be one of the biggest source of emissions for those companies. Will companies be able to stand behind such excuses when their direct industry peers are putting in the effort to disclose their entire emissions profile?
CEO & Founder at Involved Method | Expert in Strategy, Impact, Social Innovation, Sustainability & Cultural transformation | PhD in Governance & Corporate Culture | Empowering organizations to lead positive impact
1 å¹´Thank you so much for this post! Understand and guide companies in this process is complex. Great contribution ??
Sustainability Consultant | ESG | CSRD | GRI | DIRSE | 17ODS.COM
1 å¹´I have been studying the exclusions and exceptions in depth for weeks. Every time I come across a Stop or a GO, I read, reread, and read again Appendix B. It's tremendously complex to make the right decision, I always find a reason to go through the right door instead of the left, and vice versa. Great contribution! A thousand thanks!
Data-driven ESG manager working with CSRD, ESRS, DMA, Gap analysis, sustainability reporting. Cognitive psychologist by training, phd, researcher, data analyst
1 å¹´Thank you, Mirka