The Real Threat from China? A Long Term Orientation

The Real Threat from China? A Long Term Orientation

Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, while not exactly loved by everyone, do give a glimpse into the thought process of different national cultures when it comes to issues like risk aversion, preferences for meritocracy and long term versus short term orientation, etc. The dimension that is most interesting to consider as it relates to China is their long term orientation. As a country with a long history and a fair amount of patience, China has been making plans for their own global ascendancy for many years. It seems as if only now are those in the western world really beginning to take notice. 

For some China scholars, China is in the midst of a 100 year plan to replace the US as the lead nation in a new world order. Although scholars disagree on the exact date of inception, let’s say that the program was launched around 1953 by Mao Zedong (beginning with Mao’s first five year plan begun in 1953 to boost industrial development and second five year plan begun in 1958 called the Great Leap Forward). This would place the completion date at 2053. 

The strategy is based on military, political and economic development. While China may not always be the largest nation in terms of population (India is set to overtake China in 2022), they already possess the world’s largest military force in terms of number. Granted, they are currently behind in terms of military technology (airpower, sea power, weaponry). Still, they have been expanding with new carriers, cruisers, and aircraft with significant increases in the military budget. In addition, a denuclearized Korean peninsula would be quite advantageous for them.

Economically, China now has the second largest nominal GDP and its per capita GDP has increased from $132 in 1962 to $6894 in 2016. While still far below the US in terms of per capita GDP, the average annual rate of growth continues to be among the highest in the world.

Politically, China has been expanding their influence around Europe, Asia, Africa as well as Central and South America. A few years ago, China embarked on a major economic development program, One Belt One Road initiative, planning the build out of infrastructure along land and sea corridors from China to Europe affecting nearly 60 countries. This infrastructure emphasis has also impacted elsewhere in Africa and across the Atlantic to South America. China is becoming the go-to nation for infrastructure development.

Militarily, economically, politically, it seems like China is making some solid progress. Perhaps not everyone believes that there really is a 100 year plan, however, it is clear that China has been very methodical about their military, economic and political progress. Five year plans, twenty year plans, or a hundred year plan, China’s patience and long term orientation is definitely something to think about and probably to worry about.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

James Stewart Welch, Jr.的更多文章

  • Naked Short Selling: Not as fun as it sounds

    Naked Short Selling: Not as fun as it sounds

    The GameStop drama has brought new attention to an old practice. Short selling is an investment strategy where an…

  • How the Peloton CEO talked me out of buying shares

    How the Peloton CEO talked me out of buying shares

    As an active investor I am always looking for new trading positions, so when Peloton (PTON) sold off today (February 5,…

    1 条评论
  • Why Populism Backfires

    Why Populism Backfires

    In case you haven't noticed, the stock market has been quite interesting recently. Shares in Gamestop have risen over…

    1 条评论
  • Four Keys for Corporate Reemergence: Replace, Restructure, Redevelop and Re-brand

    Four Keys for Corporate Reemergence: Replace, Restructure, Redevelop and Re-brand

    When examining Volkswagen’s dramatic recovery from the company’s emissions scandal from a few years ago, it is clear to…

  • The Race is Not Won at the Finish Line

    The Race is Not Won at the Finish Line

    When I was younger, running was easy. Breaking a six minute mile was fairly effortless.

  • Disagreeing with Warren Buffett?

    Disagreeing with Warren Buffett?

    I do not normally disagree with Warren Buffett, but today I find myself on the opposite side of a very important issue.…

  • Tariffs: What Would Adam Smith Do?

    Tariffs: What Would Adam Smith Do?

    Adam Smith, writing in the mid-eighteenth century, discussed the unfavorable government practice of stimulating exports…

  • How to Get Rich Quick? Be Patient!

    How to Get Rich Quick? Be Patient!

    Recently someone asked me what two words I would say to my younger self. To me that is a very easy question.

    2 条评论
  • Three Reasons Why Limiting Pre-Tax 401K Deductions is Not a Good Idea

    Three Reasons Why Limiting Pre-Tax 401K Deductions is Not a Good Idea

    While it still remains to be seen what actual changes will take place under the final tax reform package, one idea that…

  • Neither a borrower nor a lender be?

    Neither a borrower nor a lender be?

    Most personal financial counselors suggest paying off debt and some even promote zero debt living, however, the world…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了