A Real Jump Scare: IUL Premium Financing Is Like the Hotel California of the Life Insurance Business - You Can Check In, But You Can Never Leave
For those who have followed my previous posts, you know I am no fan of premium financed IUL. I have also engaged in three separate industry-sponsored debates on the topic with some of the self-anointed kings of IUL premium finance. All of my posts on this topic have led to an increase in inquiries from law firms reaching out (at least one every other week) to ask if I would act as an expert witness in their litigation that’s currently being filed with the courts. I have even received the occasional call from a distressed consumer who has found themselves trapped in one of these terrifying IUL strategies. In addition to my interactions with those parties, Valmark has stepped in countless times to provide second opinions to our Member Offices regarding failed transactions and how best to exit them. ?
As I listen and review original sales materials and documents from multiple cases and consumer stories, the facts are usually strikingly similar to each other. We hear things like, “I was promised I could buy a lot of insurance by just paying a little bit in interest” or “the loan was supposed to be low risk with only temporary collateral needed to get the program started and the policy would pay off the bank loan afterwards.” Once they have seen how the transaction plays out, most consumers say something like, and I am paraphrasing here, “I would’ve been better off leaving my money in my business and using my balance sheet to pay for these policies with little money out of pocket” and “I was shown an alternative of paying for this out of pocket and the IRR on the financed plan was 4X the policy paid for outright.”
The end is the same for all of those I have spoken to; a policy that is now earning less than the cost of the loan, unmanageable collateral calls, and a giant financial hole that is difficult to get out of. After these clients discover how these transactions play out, they are upside down a million dollars or more and they feel trapped.
Based on these conversations and review of in force programs, here are some considerations that, I believe, if consumers knew of in advance, they never would have entered these transactions to begin with:
Why are insurance agents still proposing these transactions despite evidence of their failure?
I recently saw an invitation to a huge premium finance seminar that appears to be expecting over a thousand attendees from the life insurance industry. When discussing the event with someone, they asked “how can this be when the results have been so bad?” The answer is, in many cases, greed. A premium financed policy that purports to pay for itself has a 400-500% larger premium and commission than one paid out of pocket. I can only conclude that an agent proposing these transactions must be thinking results be dammed, full-speed ahead.
In our experience, the best premium financed policy is one that doesn’t get sold. The sooner someone realizes they made a mistake, the less financial pain there will be getting out. I think that every single person who has entered one of these transactions should get a professional second opinion to know exactly what kind of risk they have exposure to and what their options are going forward. Of course, the people who sold it will remark that interest rates will come down or advise the consumer to be patient, but let’s not forget that they are not the ones at risk.???
I have several articles and resources on this topic, including a presentation I used when speaking at Forum 400 , two articles (IUL: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly and Retirement Castles in the Clouds). You can access these items by emailing Brandy Friedt, M.A. at [email protected].
Regional Vice President
6 天前Well written article, thanks for sharing and verifying many of the same concerns I try to stress to agents and advisors on a regular basis.
Independent Financial Consultant who works on an hourly rate (I don’t manage money or sell financial products)
1 周It just baffles me that people defend using premium financed life insurance. IUL is particularly egregious. With negative leverage, the ONLY profitable way out is death. The numbers on those IUL illustrations are lies. One bad year with a zero return and the hole turns into a canyon. I’m tired of even pretending there is merit in the concept. I hope every advisor and the carrier involved get sued.
President/General Agent at Northeast Insurance Brokers
2 周I have used arbitrage my entire career and always look for ways to help clients pay for their coverage in the most efficient way. Unfortunately, many of these "deals" are never structured correctly or in the best interests of the client and many insurance companies are as guilty of this as their agents who pitch these plans. Now we have so called IUL experts promoting IUL as a better alternative to Section 401(k) plans. Many of these experts were selling vacuum cleaners before receiving their insurance licenses and are clueless. I have been auditing life insurance policies for many years and I have seen some real doozies over the years. It all comes down to the same thing, 'Figures don't lie and liars don't figure" and there is no free lunch in anything, least of life insurance protection. Our industry on a whole needs to do better.
Highly credentialed advisor helping executives and business owners understand and diversify single company risk, protect their balance sheets, and secure their retirement and legacy.
2 周Excellent article. Thanks for sharing.
Member at Forbes Finance Council | The MOST Connected Person in Life Insurance & Annuities | Relationship-Builder | Annuity Expert | Life Insurance Expert | Distribution Pro | Strategy Diva | Competitive Intel Guru
3 周I am always interested in your take on premium finance Larry J. Rybka, JD, CFP? . Thank you again for dropping some knowledge on the rest of us. sjm