The real impact of terrorism – shattered lives


This blog appeared in The Hill Times on November 13, 2017 (https://www.hilltimes.com/2017/11/13/real-impact-terrorism-shattered-lives/125186)

In the aftermath of a terrorist attack we all go through a typical laundry list of questions. Who is behind this act and did he act alone? Are there others out there? What will he be charged with? What can we do to prevent future attacks? Why is this happening?

These are, of course, good questions and completely understandable ones. We want, after all, to know what is going on and what it really means. To help us figure out these mysteries the media rolls out the usual suspects – academics, ‘experts’ and even a few former practitioners (full disclosure: I belong to the third category) – and we hear what they have to say to us. We usually get a few minutes worth of ‘analysis’ and move on.

The other part is that we obsess on the perpetrator(s). Where are they from? How did they get ‘radicalised’? Why did they do this? What else can we learn from investigating every aspect of their lives? The attack and its effects often plays second fiddle to the one(s) who carried it out.

I’d like to bring the focus back, albeit, for a short time, to those whose stories we hear much less about: those of the victims. We rarely learn anything other than how many died and how many were wounded. We sometimes get poignant stories on who they are and the families and loved ones and then our attention is seized by the next big attack (or mass shooting – they really are the same in many ways). We forget about those who were there when the bomb went off and who suffered, and continue to suffer, horribly. I’d like to make a small contribution to correcting this. Here are some of those stories.

On September 30 and into October 1 of this year a man drove a car into a police officer, jumped out to stab him, fled and later ran over four people on Jasper Avenue in Edmonton. I do not want to talk about him: in fact, some media outlets refuse to publish the names of violent extremists. I want to convey what has happened to Kim O’Hara, one of the victims.  She endured serious head injuries and a broken leg in the attack and is recovering slowly. She is a single mom with joint custody of her nine-year old son whom she misses terribly. Her road back to work and to normalcy could be a long one. Just because she was in a terrorist attack does not mean that the bills and expenses have stopped and friends and family have set up a GoFundMe account.

A year ago Islamic State-inspired terrorists went on a killing spree in Paris in which they killed 130 people and wounded more than 400.  Some of the victims are still trying to piece back their lives and they have done so in part by getting tattoos. Even some of those who lost family members and loved ones have undergone the procedure.

  • Laura Leveque was ‘buried under corpses’ and ‘was soaked in blood and flesh’: the dead ‘seeped’ into her. She now carries a raven on her shoulder surrounded by smaller tattoos of an eclipse, a snake biting its own tail to symbolise the “cycle of life”, and “flowers growing on a battlefield”.
  • Sophie took two bullets to her leg and cannot move one foot: she covered her thigh with a huge Mexican Day of the Dead “Catrina” skeleton lady, adding a sunflower tattoo on her foot. She does not want to ‘sublimate her wounds’ but rather ‘illuminate’ them.
  • For Manon Hautecoeur “this is my scar” – her lion tattoo and the motto of Paris — “Fluctuat nec mergitur” (Battered but not sunk) — which became a defiant slogan after the attacks.

These are real people who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. None of what happened to them was their ‘fault’. The terrorists either die in their misguided attacks or are captured and spend the rest of their pathetic lives in prisons. The victims and their families continue with their lives under severe circumstances. Let us remember them more often and offer whatever support we can, shall we?

 

As a former Refugee Judge, I know exactly what you are talking about. I had to listen and comfort them. And I also got secondary PTSD.

回复
Sheema Khan

Patent Agent. Harvard PhD (Chemical Physics). Globe and Mail Columnist. Author. TedX Speaker.

7 年

Thanks for reminding us of the human cost, in very real terms. How can I locate the GoFundMe page for Kim O'Hara?

回复
John de Boer

Senior Director, Government Affairs and Public Policy at BlackBerry

7 年

Liked your interview today on the Current

回复
Thafar Maaitah, Ph.D, MSyI,F.ISRM, F.SPA

Advisor / Transport Security Expert, C.Terrorism - CVE -Corporate Security and Control - SME - RSO/RSS. FBINA. SMIA. Lead auditor ISO 18788 ( SOMS ), Risk, Crisis and Emergency management

7 年

Dear Phil ... wish you good day ... thank you for the article ... you mentioned that there a terrorist who got radicalized for some reason and a victim who was present at the wrong time at the wrong place ... and I agree with you in this classification ... but I won't stop here ... I will use broader approach in my analysis .. the first Category is the direct terrorist and indirect terrorist ... the second category is the direct victim and indirect victim ... category one : terrorist This needs deep analysis to understand and explain all question you raised how, why they got radicalized... for me the terrorist is a tool, utilized by other factors. After the act the terrorist is no more than bullet... the indirect terrorists .. this what we need to learn about .. they will try looking for another bullet to shot some where ... and this is the source of the threat ... our work to stop those of getting more people to get radicalized Category two The direct victim /s who always forgotten by the media few days after the incident ... they could be the victim and immediate family who will suffer the consequences of the attack ... and maybe their life will change for ever .. the indirect victim could be immediate friend-relatives

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Phil Gurski的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了