Real or fake?

Real or fake?

One of my long-standing 'rules of thumb' is that if a business letter, email, or web site contains poorly constructed English, then it is likely to be from some scammer. It is not an absolute certainty, as we all make mistakes, but I take the view that any business will check and double-check its publically-available output so as to ensure that it projects the best image and does not confuse or mislead.

Increasingly, however, I find that many genuine communications contain poor grammar or syntax. While spelling mistakes are rare, I assume that that is because the spelling check (or, as the US would say, spell check) in the word-processor is protecting the text composer. The most common problems - and these are increasing - are missing apostrophes or, occasionally, misapplied apostrophes.

Another problem is the lack of distinction between a dash and an hyphen. As a rule, the former is intended to separate the text and the latter to join it. Even business’ titles seem to confuse these two.

It is now rare to receive an email or letter that does not contain at least one basic error. And that is before one tries to untangle the jargon from the facts, which is sometimes quite difficult.

So, this is an appeal to businesses. If you cannot find amongst your professional staff one or two whose language skills are at a reasonable level, then you really need to employ a professional editor to check your work. If you do not, your credibility is going to continue to suffer – and I will have to work harder to avoid the scams.




要查看或添加评论,请登录

Alan Patterson FRICS的更多文章

  • Unworkable offices

    Unworkable offices

    Alan Patterson, VARE Consulting Ltd As social/business restrictions are gradually eased throughout most (but not all)…

    2 条评论
  • Now is the time for researchers to come to the aid of the real estate asset class

    Now is the time for researchers to come to the aid of the real estate asset class

    Alan Patterson MSc FRICS, VARE Consulting Ltd In the wake of the dot-com excesses of the early 2000s, regulators…

    14 条评论
  • What Covid 19 means for real estate

    What Covid 19 means for real estate

    Alan Patterson FRICS The quoted equity markets have responded very clearly to the economic threat of the coronavirus…

    10 条评论
  • Misunderstood risk

    Misunderstood risk

    Perhaps nothing in investment causes more confusion or raises more questions than a discussion on investment risk. In…

    5 条评论
  • The UK election and the property markets

    The UK election and the property markets

    The latest RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) UK residential survey of member firms – undertaken prior to…

    5 条评论
  • Worried about your investments in equities?

    Worried about your investments in equities?

    Very little of the general equities market and economic commentary on LinkedIn is positive about the prospects for…

  • Invest counter-conventionally

    Invest counter-conventionally

    One of the characteristics of modern investors is how compartmentalised or specialised they have become. Institutions…

  • Forecasts naively or deliberately wrong?

    Forecasts naively or deliberately wrong?

    As news broke in June 2016 on the UK’s referendum decision, economists and analysts rushed to downgrade their…

    2 条评论
  • No bubble evident

    No bubble evident

    We are continuously subject to spurious arguments that there is a bubble developing or, more typically, a bubble has…

    2 条评论
  • Start managing the real estate risks now

    Start managing the real estate risks now

    As real estate values’ capital value growth slows and then the values deteriorate, slowly at first but now…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了