[RBM] Finding the right decision-makers systematic way!
Own created, shows different elements of RPIAD process with example decision assumptions.

[RBM] Finding the right decision-makers systematic way!

Based on discussions with some of the people that reads my last two posts about decision-making, I have decided to turn it into an article and expand it into a series, RAPID-based Modernization. #RBM.

The first article will include two posts I have published before - maybe with a bit of additional comments and more examples. Next ones will drive us through more end to end examples and will describe how it can be used from the idea to implementation of the modernization initiative.

Ok, let's start with the most important question in decision-making procedure - who is needed to be engaged to make this decision?

From one side you can think, this is easy - every company, or better most of them have hierarchical structure and there is always someone above us that should make decision. In this case, using such tree we can reach right person to make decision - right, so simple?

Not so simple, I have never seen a company that works correctly using this approach, such model will always make someone not happy and in final company will lose - minimum potential it can create engaging more people.

From the other side, I have seen that lack of ability to make correct decisions struggle most of the cases of modernization processes. There are mostly two cases: no much people engaged, or numerous people engaged in modernization. However, without clear role assignment, especially clear role in decision-making process.

This inspires me to work on some kind of Framework to summarize my experience and to make such process easier. At this moment, I will share with you the first part of this process, which is my interpretation of RAPID framework organized around modernization subjects. In my case, the more proper acronym will be RPIAD as I have revised the order of people that takes role in this process.

No alt text provided for this image


This tool helps me find what people engage in which stage and ask - what problems they will have with the subject of this decision.

Then for example: if we consider implementing new platform for CICD, in "I" - "Inform" we can choose Developers, DevOpses, Release Management Team, etc. Then all the people that will have any contact with new platform and that they can have any requirements related with it. However, for example in "P" - "Perform" we can limit this to real users then mostly Developers and DevOpses as they will be final users of our system, and they will be only people that experience is important from usage perspective.

Okay, this is theoretical side of my RPIAD process, now we have to concentrate to find such people. To achieve this, I have simplified a little center of image and put notes for every role in the process.

No alt text provided for this image

Now, getting with RPIAD order, you can ask significant questions for each phase.

Then for "R" - "Recommendation" - you can think who will help in recommending and getting acceptance for initiative.

For "P" then "Perform" you can ask who is using it, who will implement it and how this can impact this group of people.

For "I" then "Inform" you can ask who will have any contact with our system and is a potential reviewer or source of information in deciding.

For "A" you can validate what formal acceptance will be needed and finally for "D" you can think who is decision maker - real decision maker!

You can also describe this person engagement into these steps, then you will see what information they will want from your side. Getting this information will simplify the process later on. I will propose you to make few attempts to fill this data and evaluate each time if such person or group must be involved

Where have I been using it?

Starting from modernization processes and making decision what tools, where, what methodology, what changes. Trough process modifications and optimization, into new tool recognition and finally in my case even in sales process to gather knowledge who is needed to buy my product!

I believe having such tool can clarify what you are supposed to do in multiple cases. What did you think about this? Are you ready to try?

Don't hesitate to ask me questions if you have, I love insightful discussions!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Marcin Karkocha的更多文章

  • [RBM] - what a lovely chaos

    [RBM] - what a lovely chaos

    Today article is about usual way transformations happen. One thing that is great is that it happen.

    2 条评论
  • [RBM] - Case study - not today!

    [RBM] - Case study - not today!

    Today's post will be about a banking project, a project I will name Titanic! It was monumental, it was smooth, everyone…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] - Case study - too good to be real!

    [RBM] - Case study - too good to be real!

    Okay, today it's time for a second case study. This case is that good that in the first moment I thanked that it's…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] - Case study - no decision makers!

    [RBM] - Case study - no decision makers!

    As I promised, our RAPID-based modernization cycle will end. Right now, I want to share with you a few case studies of…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] - Roadmap blindness

    [RBM] - Roadmap blindness

    Hello, today last subject based on your questions and discussion over Tech Leaders Meetup. This time we will catch the…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] - Transformation Committee

    [RBM] - Transformation Committee

    Hello, today is the next post in our RAPID-based Modernization series based on popular questions you have raised. The…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] - How to choose right vendor?

    [RBM] - How to choose right vendor?

    As I proposed and based on your questions and discussions on last Tech Leaders Meetup, I will publish now few…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] How to own the stage during the decision-making meeting.

    [RBM] How to own the stage during the decision-making meeting.

    Okay, we finally reached your dreamed point of final decision. If you do everything right and take care in various…

    1 条评论
  • [RBM] “D” - How to show benefits of modernization for the C-Suite.

    [RBM] “D” - How to show benefits of modernization for the C-Suite.

    Okay, after the last article, you should know how to find a friendly voice at the decision-making level. It is often…

  • [RBM] “D” - Engaging decision-makers at the early stage of proposal.

    [RBM] “D” - Engaging decision-makers at the early stage of proposal.

    Most of the time, your decision makers are C-level employees related to technology and change. They typically hold…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了