Ranking football spending among all Divison I schools and conferences
For 2023, I've ranked every FBS conference and public D-1 football program expenses from #1 to #167

Ranking football spending among all Divison I schools and conferences

It’s raining money on football: in 2023, $2.7 BILLION spent on FBS publics' football, $826 million to coaches,? and a $25 million gap in median spending between the Haves and Have Nots.?

The 2022-2023 fiscal year in college sports proved to be a boon for college football and college football coaches, with the median of FBS spending on football per public institution $22.5 million, $7.5 million for its 11 paid football coaches, and approximately one-third (33.1%) of all expenses for football were paid to coaches, according to data provided by the Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database.

There is a clear dichotomy in spending for the Haves (Power 5) and Have Nots (Group of 5).? The median of Power 5 spending on football per public institution was $37.1 million, $11.6 million for all its football coaches (an average of $1.05 million per coach), or 31.2% of all expenses for football paid to coaches.? The median of Group of 5 spending on football per public institution was $11.6 million, $3.1 million for all its football coaches (an average of $280K per coach), or 25.6% of all expenses for football paid to coaches.? IN OTHER WORDS, the median amount in 2023 paid in the Power 5 for football coaches was the same as the median total amount of spending for all football expenses for the Group of 5.? In 2023, there was a $25 million gap in total football spending between the Power Five and Group of Five medians.

Over a ten-year period (2014-2023), the median of FBS public institutions (both Power 5 and Group of 5) has seen an increase of over 50% in spending on football in the past 10 years (see below):

Source: Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database, https://knightnewhousedata.org/reports/5d058011

A few items of interest:?

  • In 2023, $2.7 BILLION was spent on football in FBS public institutions; with $826 million (30.4%) to all the paid football coaches.?
  • The University of Cincinnati (#50) and the University of Central Florida (#53) are the only two non-Power 5 public institutions to spend more money than at least one of the 54 Power 5 institutions in this database.?
  • For most athletics conferences, paying football coaches made up between 1/4 and 1/3 of the entire amount of football spending.
  • You can se the impact of the Pacific-12 demise (particularly with respect to its impact on the College Football Playoff) through how much it paid its coaches: (all data are for public institutions only) a median of $8.9 million compared to the median of $13.9 million for the SEC and $13.2 million for the Big Ten. It’s tough to be competitive in football when the spending on coaches is $3.5 to $4 million less than the top of the heap: that’s 45% less in the Pac-12 than the SEC, and 39% less than the Big Ten.

Bottom line, the spending continues to increase — and the big-time spending is not going back to the labor, a.k.a. the college football player (other than in the form of a scholarship).? Since athletics departments are non-profit, and the marketplace for college football is uber-competitive, the money raised ($10.6 billion in FBS in 2023) has to go somewhere, and it is spent primarily back into the football enterprise with a good chunk to coaches. ?

To see where your institution fits, and to make comparisons by athletics conference, see below. (Note: several institutions did not have data available, listed at the bottom, as well as military academies and some Pennsylvania schools).




Sam Fleischer

Well-Seasoned Internal Organizational Communications and Education/Training Professional

7 个月

Thanks for the analysis. The sport is going to lose 90 percent of its audience by 2030, really, when it's clear most people's "schools" are in the have-nots group. Maybe this is emotional projection, but once their schools have no chance, fans don't keep watching the sport; this isn't the NFL or even English soccer. If college football wants to create an "Akufo League" (forgive the Ted Lasso reference), the sport is going to be hurting as only the alums and tangential fans of those "rich" schools are going to care/spend/watch. Is that enough to keep it all afloat? While basketball is heading this way more slowly, it's still more appealing to watch March Madness than an expanded CFP, by far: more equitable access, more selection transparency, more "hope" for the small schools, etc. College football is going to cannibalize itself out of corruption and greed within a decade. ??

回复
B. David Ridpath

Professor at Ohio University, Expert Witness and College Sports Consultant

7 个月

Haves and never will be's

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了