Rail 101 - Driving fishplates to extinction

Rail 101 - Driving fishplates to extinction

For those that thought a fishplate was something used to serve your dinner upon I should probably explain that this is a railway related article, not one discussing the best way to serve your fish supper.

Most people in the rail industry today will know what a fishplate is, but will future generations ever contemplate the origins of the name for this rapidly disappearing part of rail infrastructure?

For those that are unfamiliar with fishplates, these are strips of steel (usually) that join two ends of a rail together via bolts through holes in the rail to allow the ends of the rails to remain aligned with each other as a rail vehicle passes over them. Some readers may be old enough to remember the regular ‘click-ety-clack of trains’ passing over this jointed track and it is still present in some routes. Used for centuries the origins of the fishplate name seem to be unclear. Other names for the same item used are Joint bar, splice bar, and tie plate but there are probably other names used particularly when the bolts are seized!

Some believe the name is derived from the French “ficher” which means to fix or peg, others that the name came from the ‘fish’ used to strengthen ships masts in a similar manner. I have also heard reference to the plates used to join fishbellied cast iron rails, and others referring to the cast fins that were present in early items. Some even believe the name came from the early items looking like the kitchen fish serving plate. The first formal mentions of the name came in 1847's where patents were filed for this item used to join rails. Whatever the origins of the name, the humble fishplate seems to be an item undergoing rapid decline.

Fishplate drawing from the original patent filed in 1847

 The patent application drawing for a rail fishplate (1847)

The rail industry generally regards joints in the rail as weak points, (as shown in my previous article), as they require more maintenance and fail more frequently than the parent rail and I would not disagree. There has been a drive to decrease the number of joints required in track and therefore a drive to increase rail lengths. The longest single piece rails are now 150m I believe, with 100+m available from several suppliers including three rail plants in Europe.

There have of course been developments in welding rails to form long lengths of continuously welded rail (CWR) to reduce the number of physical joints required. The end result is a massive reduction in the ‘clickety-clack’ of rail travel and a huge decrease in the number of fishplates in use. With the increasing use and quality of welding to join rails together on site, combined with the high profile accident in France in July 2013 where 6 people lost their lives, being likely caused by a faulty fishplate joint, I have to ask "Are the days of the humble fishplate are numbered?", such are the industry drivers to eliminate this sort of rail joint.

However the fishplate still may have some fight left in its tail - fishplates do have some key advantages in some cases. In most forms the fishplate joint allows for thermal expansion of the rail. The rail joint is not completely rigid and so allows thermal expansion and contraction of the rail to take place. With the short rail lengths that usually accompany fishplate use, this means track is not significantly stressed, unlike continuously welded rail (CWR). This poses some advantages particularly on tight curves where CWR usage may be impractical as the curve tries to ‘pull straight’ under the rail tension required. Equally other areas where rail stresses can prove problematic, (such as around switches), also mean that fishplates are still the default solution to some applications. There are some excellent articles written by Constantin Ciobanu that show how fishplates accommodate the thermal expansion of rails. An article here discusses jointed track "breathing" and I love this animation showing how the fishplate allows movement of the rails due to thermal expansion - taken from his article here explaining where the origins of "short" and "long" rail names came from.

Animation of thermal length change in a fishplated joint from Constantin Ciobanu

Whilst use of the humble fishplate clings on in some area of new track such as switches and crossings and very tight curves, do you think our future rail engineers will ever need to tension the bolts and check the gaps?

I hope you enjoyed this small glimpse into the world of rail and I hope you'll follow me for other rail related articles. Please share with or tag potentially interested people in the comments. I always love to hear your views and comments so leave them in the comments below.

David Cartledge

Director of Sales at Staytite Ltd

3 年

  • 该图片无替代文字
David Cartledge

Director of Sales at Staytite Ltd

3 年

Fishplate upgrade kit/contents

  • 该图片无替代文字
Matt Beatham

Track Safety and Technical Trainer and Assessor, IEng MICE, MPWI

4 年

Hi Daniel. Thanks for writing this helpful and interesting article. Just to fact check, you said you believe that the longest single piece rails are now 150m. We used to install 709ft lengths of rail (216m) when carrying out track renewals. These were delivered by Rail Delivery Train or Long Welded Rail Train and then installed and welded in to create long lengths of CWR. This may be the maximum length that can be delivered.

回复

During review of Book "Ellis' British Railway Engineering Encyclopaedia" I have found that?why Fish Plate is called FISH PLATE because of french word "fiche" means peg. I was always wondering why it is called fish plate.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了