Racism Towards Diane Abbott MP Highlights that Gender Equality Cannot be Achieved Unless Approached Through an Intersectional Lens

Racism Towards Diane Abbott MP Highlights that Gender Equality Cannot be Achieved Unless Approached Through an Intersectional Lens

There are many events and celebrations taking place to mark International Women’s Day throughout the month of March. At a time when we should be recognising worldwide improvements to gender equality and highlighting what more needs to be done, it is with great disappointment to see the events unfold this week concerning racism and sexism towards Diane Abbott, MP.


The reported comments made by Frank Hester, the UK’s Conservative party’s biggest donor, amount to misogynoir. Misogynoir is defined by the Oxford Language Dictionary as ‘dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against black women.’


The comments are alleged to have been made in a private meeting in 2019, something which Frank Hester does not deny, but is reported as saying that he is not racist. Whether he sees himself as racist or not, the comment he made is racist.

?

If you have not seen the news headlines about it yet, I am not wanting to repeat his words, and you can read about what he said here.


UK Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak has spoken and acknowledged that the comment is racist. Why did it take him so long to speak up about it? Is it because in doing so, he is acknowledging that the actions of his party’s biggest financial contributor were racist? And is he worried about having to return the £10million donation made by Hester, in the run-up to a general election, a time when the party needs all the money it can get?


That the CEO of such a prominent company can make remarks like this is deplorable. It is reported that Diane Abbott has reported him to the police and rightly so. There should be an investigation into whether a hate crime has been committed.


What concerns me is that, if the comment was made in a meeting in 2019, why has it taken 5 years to come to light? What of the other people in attendance at the meeting? Did they ignore the comment at the time, and as such become complicit? Or did they speak up and challenge the racism and sexism that took place at the time? This is something that I haven’t yet been able to shed light on and something I suspect will be revealed in time.


The comment Frank Hester made about Diane Abbot, got me thinking about the inequalities that continue to exist for Black women and women of (what is termed) other minority ethnic groups. At a time when we reflect on progress toward gender equality, although we have seen significant strides over the years, gender equality cannot be achieved unless it is approached through an intersectional lens.


I recently attended a women’s leadership conference in central London and was one of very few Black women in attendance. There were also only a few of Asian ethnicity and mixed Black ethnicity appearance too. Given that London is made up of 13.5% of people who identify as Black, 20% who identify as Asian, and 5.7% of mixed ethnicity, this was not reflected in the diversity of the women attending the conference.


The organisers had ensured that there was diversity amongst the speakers, but was the lack of women from the global majority indicative of the low number of these women in leadership roles here in the UK?


The recent FTSE Women’s Leader Review shows that at 42%, the representation of women on FTSE 350 Boards has increased beyond the 40% target, ahead of the 2025 target deadline. This is a significant improvement from the 9.5% in 2011. But it is not enough. Achieving a split of 40% women and 40% men on boards is not gender equality if the data shows inequalities exist at the intersections of gender.

?

The Parker Review seeks to address a lack of ethnic diversity at senior levels. The latest report shows that 96% of FTSE100 companies have at least one ethnic minority director on the Board.


However, FTSE 350 companies are to set their own targets for the percentage of their senior management group who self-identify as being from an ethnic minority. A voluntary approach like this might not be sufficient to drive meaningful change and could result in slow progress.


Whilst there are regional variations in the numbers of minority ethnic groups, which, will be reflected at senior leadership levels, could they have been more prescriptive and set targets, that allow for regional variations?


These reviews do not account for other intersecting identities that impact gender inequality. Looking at the gender pay gap here in the UK significant disparities exist between employees aged 40 and over and those under 40 and there is a notable difference between higher and lower earners.


The Office for National Statistics data on ethnicity pay gaps reports that Black, African, Caribbean, or Black British employees earned less (£13.53) median gross hourly pay than White employees (£14.35), which has been consistent since 2012.


When it comes to unemployment, the Institute for Fiscal Studies reports that Pakistani women have unemployment rates three times more than White women.


The 2022 Fawcett Society, Sex and Power Index revealed that ‘women of colour are vastly under-represented at the highest levels of many sectors and alarmingly, they are missing altogether from senior roles such as Supreme Court Justices, Metro Mayors, Police and Crime Commissioners and FTSE 100 CEOs.’


Research by McKinsey in 2023 found that Black, Bangladeshi, and Pakistani groups in the UK were the furthest behind on pay and labour force participation.


As for disabled women, analysis by the TUC shows that disabled women face the biggest pay gap. Non-disabled men are paid on average 30% (£3.73 an hour, £130.55 a week, or £6,780 a year) more than disabled women.?Not to mention other disparities that exist for this group of women.


I applaud the progress made to increase the representation of women on UK boards, but it does not amount to gender equality. There is still a lot that needs to be done both in and outside the boardroom. And gender equality cannot be achieved without being approached through an intersectional lens.



?

You don't need to be loud to stand out as a leader, but you do need to have presence. Presence is about the way you show up, the way you are perceived, and the impact you make. As a leader who is introverted, you can exude presence in a way that works for you, without having to put on an extraverted persona and pretend to be someone that you're not. Pretending to be someone that you are not can be draining and chip away at your self-belief and self-confidence. In this live session, I will share how you can confidently exude presence in your own authentic, introverted way. Register here to be informed when I go live.




Join me in London on 13 September 2024 for Quietly Visible: The Introverted Leaders Conference, the first-ever conference for introverted leaders. To be informed of when tickets go on sale and to receive an exclusive discount on the price, you can join the waitlist here.


If your organisation wants to take a lead in this paradigm shift, there are sponsorship packages for the conference available. Email [email protected] to find out more.





Many introverts shy away from being in the spotlight and having attention focused on themselves. Demonstrating your thought leadership is a good way for you to become widely known in your organisation and industry for your knowledge and expertise. If you hate self-promotion, it enables you to self-promote in ways that don't make it feel like it is all about you. In this episode of the podcast I speak to kate pozeznik about how you can showcase your thought leadership without having to shout from the rooftop.




About Me

I am an Executive, Career and Leadership Coach specialising in introverted women who are senior leaders. Through my work, I have helped 1000s of women across the globe to increase their confidence, influence and impact as leaders, and overcome imposter syndrome, increase their executive presence, improve speaking performance in meetings, get a promotion, and much more.


If self-doubt, imposter syndrome, and other self-limiting beliefs leave you lacking self-confidence and holding yourself back, take part in my free 5 Day Mind Cleanse. This 5 day challenge will help you change unhelpful, negative thoughts and beliefs you have about yourself, which will help increase your self-confidence. Find out more and join the 5 Day Mind Cleanse here.


If you are an introverted woman and a senior leader and want to increase your confidence, influence and impact, take my free assessment and get a report identifying areas to develop. You can take the assessment here.


Nada P.

NPTW Consultants: all about navigating trade rules (WTO, with a focus on post-Brexit UK) and we're former diplomats, with decades of experience as negotiators and former Australian Ministerial staffers.

11 个月

After this reporting on the racial slur against Diane Abbott, I wonder why so few of the mainstream media are interviewing the woman herself. There have been a lot of stories?ABOUT Diane Abbott, here in the UK, but I have seen no interviews with her by the mainstream news. She is the longest-serving Black Member of Parliament. Hmmmmm. what's going on?

回复

I can't support Diane Abbot ,? she thinks that 'all' white people like playing the game of divide and conquer , nice non racist ideology Diane ! If anyone has view on any race white , black etc then I think they do not deserve any platform or support or sympathy but then that's politics for you.

回复
S.E. Yarbrough Jr

AS400 / IBM i & Z0S / SW Engineer

12 个月

Yes! Let’s celebrate “International Women’s Day. Thanks for sharing.

Sarah Tite

Helping emerging leaders in charities to thrive and create more impact. Through 1 to 1 coaching, facilitation and interim management. interim placements. Certified coach/certified trainer|charity leader

12 个月

Thanks for taking time to share your thoughts. When a leader does not stand up to support everyone they show they are just for the few maybe with loudest voices or deepest pockets. Like you have been thinking why it took 5 years to come to light.

Fraser Williams

Principal IT Consultant @ DWL Consulting | Agile, Software, Tech Acquisition

12 个月

Personally, I feel any comments made were ill advised and show a serious lack of judgement and or education. Three types of people, in my opinion: 1. Hateful racists, can't be educated and will refuse interaction from outside their sicial/thinking groups 2. People who don't hate but are uneducated with matters such as this and often show themselves up after making off the cuff comments. Are often open to conversation and education. 3. People well versed in societies norms and just know how to navigate complex situations easily and will interact with people intelligently and try to educate those who require and accept the challenges 4. People, like in category 3 above. But who hold a higher than thou opinion of themselves, and will use the shortcomings of individuals for their own betterment, political or otherwise. A situation where no one benefits and there are dangers of regressing certain movements negatively. Taking the above into consideration should we be educating or destroying? Just my two cents worth!!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Carol Stewart MSc, FIoL的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了