Quote of the Day
Glen Alleman MSSM
Vetern, Applying Systems Engineering Principles, Processes & Practices to Increase the Probability of Program Success for Complex Systems in Aerospace & Defense, Enterprise IT, and Process and Safety Industries
Combating climate change - is not optional. It's essential at EPA. We will move with a sense of urgency because we know what's at stake— US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan announcing the resumption of the agency's focus on climate change (March 17). Last month, the EPA updated its Climate Change indicators website with data from delayed (Trump's willful ignorance of science) with data from a delayed 2017 report, which states for the first time in the agency's history, that humans are, at least in part, driving climate change.
Senior Business Operations Specialist
3 年Says the scientist: " I believe there is a problem ... please fund my research" .... Common sense says the earth has about 3 - 4 % of CO2 in the atmosphere. Of that amount, natural causes contribute 97% of the CO2 emissions. So climate scientists ask us to believe that humans - who contribute a minuscule portion of CO2 (3% of 3-4% (.03 x .04 = .0012)) are responsible and look to lower human contributions by 10 or 20% (.00012 - .00024) ignoring that nature itself is 25 times more responsible than man. All this is 'settled science' supported by a 'scientific consensus' just like COVID naturally passing from bat to man. Yet the prevailing evidence concerning solar winds and solar flares is downplayed or ignored ... even though the effects of these forces is considerably greater and easier to verify. It's a case of if the evidence doesn't fit your political narrative its ignored and God help the doubters who are mercilessly castigated for opposing the tyranny of orthodoxy.