Is the Queen Still Relevant Today?

Is the Queen Still Relevant Today?

Last week, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the reigning monarch of the United Kingdom, celebrated her 70th year on the throne. The milestone makes Queen Elizabeth the longest serving monarch in UK’s history, having surpassed Queen Victoria’s 63-year reign's record seven years ago. It also makes her the third longest serving monarch in history.

In the UK, the anniversary was marked with four days of festivities and pomp – with events graced by members of the royal family in various places.

In Tanzania, celebrations were held at the British High Commissioner’s residence, with Foreign Affairs minister Liberata Mulamula as the guest of honour. In a jovial mood, the minister gave a speech about relations between the two countries, and toasted to the health of the Queen and President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

In attendance were at least a thousand diplomats, businesspeople, and “friends of Britain”. The High Commission had gone to great lengths to ensure that it was an event to remember. The idea was: if you cannot be in London, we’ll bring London to you. And it worked. The ambience, the music, the food and the booze. It was such as waste being a teetotaller in such company. This was “high society” Tanzanian style, courtesy of Her Majesty’s government.

The Day the Princess Became Queen

In person, UK High Commissioner David Concar is an archetypal British gentleman, stoic and reserved, trained to open his mouth without saying nothing at all. Sir Humphrey Appleby would have been proud. But on this occasion, he was at his charming best - the High Commissioner may not be French, but the evidence suggested that he probably had a glass or two of the French’s finest to loosen his tongue.

And he was so smooth. His speech was brilliant, providing many interesting historical titbits for the nerds in the audience to be deeply engaged.

Before these celebrations, probably few were aware that the former Princess Elizabeth became Queen Elizabeth on February 6, 1952 while on a trip to Kenya. The princess and husband were staying at Treetops, a lodge about 158km from Nairobi, where she famously “went up the tree a princess and came down the following morning a queen”. Since then, there have been 14 British prime ministers and, as Concar made sure that the audience didn’t miss, 44 Italian prime ministers!

Speaking of an overdose of democracy.

The world that surrounded the Queen then was very different. World War II had just ended. India had just gained independence. Africans were agitating for theirs. The Mau Mau uprising had started in Kenya and the British unleashed men like Idi Amin to end it. But history could not be stopped.

No alt text provided for this image

The fact was - the sun was setting on the British Empire. “The wind of change blowing through Africa has become a hurricane,” declared Kwame Nkrumah when Elizabeth was visiting Ghana in 1961. Thus the Queen faced huge questions over the significance of the monarchy.

Influence through Soft Power

To the British, as it is said, it is the Queen who puts the “united” in the United Kingdom, giving the nation a strong cultural grounding which serves it well in times of change. Therefore, through the anti-colonial struggles, the Cold War, Brexit and Covid, the Queen has been instrumental in ensuring that her royal subjects stood together.

In Africa, where the British have been in rapid retreat – only two percent of sub-Saharan Africa’s trade is with the UK – the Queen maintains influence over diverse independent nations which have often held diametrically opposed ideological positions. Without the Queen, there might not have been the Commonwealth today.

In the early 1960s, Kwame Nkrumah’s rule was becoming increasingly totalitarian. He had instituted a ban on multipartyism and thrown many of his opponents in jail. The West was concerned that Ghana was getting a bit too close to the USSR. Thus, the Queen’s trip was planned to neutralise that Soviet connection.

No alt text provided for this image

Nkrumah’s response to the Queen's visit was telling: “Whatever is blown into the limbo of history,' he said, 'the personal regard and affection which we have for Your Majesty will remain unaffected.”

Indeed, many an African leaders such as Mugabe and Nyerere were equally enchanted. These men were products of their times – the British monarchy meant something when they were growing up. However, standing amidst the crowd at the High Commissioner’s residence, one could have wondered what the Queen meant to African millennials present there.

What the Queen Means to Tanzanian Millennials

One Tanzanian intellectual tried to address that issue. His discourse was based on the importance of culture and history for development, thus arguing that that is what the Queen is to the British and that is what she should be to us. But I doubt whether the people reaping the rewards of the margarita-induced bliss at the High Commissioner’s residence had the capability for such convoluted reasoning.

In my opinion, the reason is simple: the British monarchy is awe-inspiring.

The Queen is a relic of the age past that is fascinating to many. Born closer to the age of slavery in America than to the age of the internet, she epitomizes a time when individuals and nations wielded unbridled power over others. That’s fascinating. The billionaire princes of the day may inspire envy but they have no mystery around them. The royal family, despite the incessant media reporting, does; and that has turned them into a different kind of celebrities in the world.

Whatever meaning Tanzanians attach to the monarch, the occasion probably meant more to them. The big event highlighted the fact that, after years in the dark, the British were announcing that they are back in business, and that people should expect big things.

That is even more relevant, huh?

David James

Retired but not tired

2 年

As always a great article from Charles Makakala but the final conclusion was surprisingly miscalculated. The event would have been entirely based on the celebration of the Queen achieving her Platinum Jubilee and wholly distinct and apart from the UK governments diminishing stance on trade or any attempt to reverse that position. Gin and tonic celebrations have their place but their influence is diminishing and I am sure Tanzanian officials can see through the veil of pleasantries and I am fairly certain that Dodoma wine or Konyagi ( or any other TZ equivalent ) was not served to cement close relationships. Her Majesty’s last visit to Tanzania was in 1979 and I attended the bash at the High Commissioners Residence in July of that year. I suspect that the respect and admiration for the Queen, as an individual has not diminished, in any way but I cannot say that about the feelings towards the UK government which the High Commissioner is bound to uphold even though he/she is primarily Her Majesty’s representative. Complicated but true.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了