Quantum Air Pollution Control
Darren Magee Snr - Associate Director Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering
Affectionately described as - "The UKs, more reserved, substantially poorer Elon Musk" - Founder/Owner of Earth Science & Technology Association - STEM Ambassador
Author:- Stephen Darren Magee FInst LM ASEE DEngM MBIFM
Head of Medical Physics & Clinical Engineering
Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust 06 March 2019
Scientific collaboration & contribution by:- Mr Joshua Buchan MSc - Astrophysicist
Non Thermal Microwave Reactor - gas analysis – A Quantum leap in pollution control
Analysing our results (Table 1) we can conclude that the harmful emissions are being reduced significantly and almost eliminated in some cases by the latest design of flow control reactor. Comparing the levels of gas before and after the Non-Thermal Microwave Reactor (NTMW) is activated; we observe a clear increase in oxygen levels. This increase is mainly from water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) that is being eliminated by the NTMW reactor.
Most interesting is that the total molecular weight in g/mol before and after the reactor is almost exactly the same. This suggests that the reaction does not eliminate but elementally transforms constituent gasses. Worthy of note is that the output gasses concentrations by percentage are very similar to Earths atmospheric composition.
Summary
We can see that these harmful gases are being eliminated, and probably through atomic elemental transformation, but how can this occour? I have explained the theory that the sub atomic particles are disassociated from parent atoms, binding forces overcome by the concentrated magnetic field energy developed within the reactor. As gasses pass through the reactor a fission/fusion process is promoted, atoms are broken down into sub atomic particles, protons, neutrons and electrons (I described this earlier as a sub atomic particulate soup) Post reaction the sub atomic particles combine, coalescing into other elements determined either by the apparatus and reactor characteristics or perhaps fusion is characterised by atmospheric conditions, this “equilibrium fusion” theory is presently being discussed with colleagues
Environmental impact
The Carbon content of the gas is significantly reduced after this process has taken place, to the point there is no more than 1% total Carbon in the whole of the output gas. Traditional chemistry would suggest that the amount of Carbon before a reaction would be equal to the amount of Carbon afterwards (just in different forms). This is why we believe an elemental transformation process is being promoted at the atomic or subatomic level, changing the very nature of the gases involved.
The removal of toxic gasses results when this reactor technology is employed; beneficial elemental components as a consequence are added in atmospheric proportions
Affectionately described as - "The UKs, more reserved, substantially poorer Elon Musk" - Founder/Owner of Earth Science & Technology Association - STEM Ambassador
5 年Probably, if one (like we did) assumed that the reactor may be responsible for the increase in mass. And I did say it was worthy of note and in fact in almost all cases output measurements were very similar to atmospheric. I have found things sometimes difficult to explain and I apologise if my decimal place etiquette was incorrect but the work has been an exciting journey of discovery.? We have created a device which can completely abate toxic gases from car and marine engine exhausts, clean massive volumes of air, observed the manifestation of a controllable black body, a phenomena which absorbs all light heat energy.? Since this paper we have done so much more work and conducted many experiments, independently observed by academic collaborators, European Technical Institutes and significant industry partners. All observable results remain around the same but we understand more about what happens to exhaust Volatile Organic Compounds,Total carbon Particulates and process flow. I am probably getting better at explaining things to, although later papers are a bit commercially sensitive.? At the centre of the process, a dissociation and coalescence of atomic particles is promoted, a fission/fusion process producing light energy (heat too) although the plasma is cool enough to touch, the temperature of the electrons is? As our understanding of gas to plasma phase transition and plasma propagation developed, we confirmed that within the plasma, the reactive species, radicals and ion decomposition and destruction of pollutant molecules, atoms and subatomic particles occurs, within this what I called "sub atomic particulate soup", electrons are continuously moving from higher energy to ground states, producing photons. in the visible spectrum different colours account for different gas composition and intensity, gas volumes.? In essence therefor a matter to light/heat energy conversion promoted by the application of Non Thermal Microwaves I hope this explains it better. Darren?
Independent Consultant
5 年Bonkers! I am reminded of the cold fusion scam. What is described is energetically impossible. If this were possible there would either be a large output or a large input of energy. The quoting of figures to 5 places of decimals just shows how this "work" is non scientific. Te increase in mass (7.5g/mol) would require the input of ~7E14 Joule/mol of energy. (A lot).