#Q&AWithSiva

#Q&AWithSiva

An organization currently uses a multi-node Mule runtime deployment model within their datacenter, The organization is planning to transition to a deployment model based on Docker containers in a Kubernetes cluster. The organization has already created a standard Docker image containing a Mule runtime and all required dependencies (including a JVM), but excluding the Mule application itself.

What is an expected outcome of this transition to container-based Mule application deployments?

A. Guaranteed consistency of execution environments across all deployments of a Mule application

B. Required change to the URL endpoints used by clients to send requests to the Mule applications

C. Required migration to the Docker and Kubernetes-based Anypoint Platform – Private Cloud Edition

D. Required redesign of Mule applications to follow microservice architecture principles

Let's begin!

Looks like a recycled cert question.

no 1: you cannot answer this question without a proper architectural description.

note: multi-node Mule runtime deployment model within their datacenter. so each Mule runtime hosts several Mule applications.

we can do that in RTF VM Version, but the versions and deployment model of mule runtime is in question here? which version of mule runtime., is it RTF or hybrid Cluster? but the only way that customers intentionally did it was caused, they are on hybrid. It could be standalone, server group or cluster..

Note: The organization is planning to transition to a deployment model based on Docker containers in a Kubernetes cluster. The organization has already created a standard Docker image containing a Mule runtime and all required dependencies (including a JVM), but excluding the Mule application itself.

No one in the right mind will do that, other than a crazy guy like me. who actually did it, but forced the customer to move on to RTF, and after that, I never recommend my customers, students, or my partners these paths. FYI RTF images cannot be customized. but yes you can play with Cores and Heap if you needed.

Note: but excluding the Mule application itself.

A mule app comes with its own dependency, a challenge for any custom java code embedded in Mule when the mule runtime environment is predefined. 3.x vs 4.x

Note: What is the expected outcome of this transition to container-based Mule application deployments?

This attempt will bomb left and right without proper change management. That answer is not in the options.