Putting a Freeze or Hold on Recruitment in Uncertain Times. Knee-Jerk Reaction or Responsible Management?
The first thing many companies do in times of uncertainty is to put a hold or freeze on recruitment, however before you publicly announce a recruitment hiatus, consider the impact it might have on your existing employees.
Since the UK voted to leave the EU, I've read some interesting comments and noticed some slight, but noticeable changes in behaviour and over the last couple of weeks and I’ve been approached by and invited to connect with candidates on Linked In who I'm sure probably wouldn’t have felt the urge to do so previously.
So what has changed? Is it purely the Brexit vote? – Possibly. However I strongly suspect it’s the messages and signals they are getting from their current employers that the drawbridge has been raised and the career opportunities and job security they thought they had 4 weeks ago have now either disappeared, or are in danger of doing so.
Whether real or imagined, what’s probably far more worrying to your employees is the threat of what often comes soon after a recruitment freeze - redundancies.
Even as you read this article, it’s quite possible that those of you that have put a recruitment freeze in place will have good people who (fearing the worst) are busy updating their CV’s and are starting to be that little bit more open to a move and perhaps more active in the jobs market.
So what do you do if one of your high-performers resigns while under a recruitment freeze? Do you try and persuade them to stay and if you try and fail, do you look to replace them, or do you keep the hiring freeze in place?
Whether you replace, or whether you don’t - be aware of the messages and signals your decision will send to the rest of your people, who will act on what you do, and what they see and feel.
The difference between recruiting and hiring
Through effective candidate engagement and employer branding, Recruiting is the continuous process of ensuring that top talent see you as the employer of choice in your industry sector/locality when they are in the market for a career move.
Hiring is the act of employing people you have succeeded in convincing that you are the employer of choice.
I think it was former GE CEO Jack Welch who said; “One of my main duties as CEO was to be ALWAYS on the lookout for new talent to bring into the organisation”. Notice he didn’t say some of the time (depending on favourable economic conditions etc……..) – he said ALL of the time.
Put another way – even in these uncertain times, if one your competitors’ top performers became available, and approached you while you had a recruitment freeze in place - would you be interested in talking to them? Of course you would – it would be foolish not to.
In summary;
I’m not saying there won’t be situations that dictate that you should put in place a hiring freeze – what I’m saying is that hopefully sooner rather than later, you will begin hiring again and this being the case, I can’t ever see a reason why, or a time when you shouldn’t always be working to attract and engage and being open to meeting with, or interviewing top talent.
Not only will a process of continuous recruitment insulate you from the impact of a sudden and unexpected resignation, it will reduce the inertia of having to recruit from a standing start every time and will send positive and reassuring messages to your existing people that you are open for business.
It will also provide you with opportunities to recruit other people’s top talent that might not have been available to you previously.
If you do decide that a hiring freeze is the right course of action for your business, make sure you communicate to your people (preferably 1-1 with your high-performers) your reasons for doing so, that it’s responsible management, that it’s (hopefully) a temporary situation, that you will be keeping a close eye on how things develop post-Brexit and as just soon as things become clearer and the situation allows, normal service will be resumed.
Founder/CEO - Black Camel Agency
8 年Not much blood flowing in 2008/09!
Chief Growth Officer @ TAtech | Founder & Chairman of the NORAs
8 年Just like the flow of blood in a body, the recruitment sector relies entirely on circulation to remain healthy. Circulation created by the flow of employees leaving a company, joining another and vice versa. This is of course supplemented by new entrants to the workforce, those returning after a break, and of course conversely those retiring. This circulation is highly reliant on confidence; of employers to make the considerable investment in a new member of staff, and the confidence of a candidate to invest their career in a new job and company, and all the risk that it entails. Leaving a secure job for a new one is possibly one of the biggest gamble an individual can make, and their confidence in a successful move is vital. Without it, they don't move, the new company doesn't get the ideal person, and the vacancy is not created for someone else to fill. This means no circulation. Coming back to your point Larry, I would say that the candidate confidence levels have been impacted by the Brexit vote just as much, or even more than that of employers. Candidates with obligations, kids, mortgages etc are far less likely to commit to a new role than before, and even more less likely to leave a job without a guarantee of a new one. Making the switch from Perm to Temp really would only be for the bravest most confident individuals.