The Publisher's AdTech Dilemma is Over: Buy and Build Your Solution

By Katia Moura Rodrigues

Welcome to the very first edition of the Assertive Yield Newsletter, where we delve into critical strategies to elevate your monetization efforts.?

One of the most crucial decisions publishers face is choosing between developing an in-house ad management solution or investing in an externally provided software as a service (SaaS) tailored for publishers. Sometimes, the approach might be to combine both!

This choice is far from trivial, as it directly influences your customer experience, product quality, and long-term revenue growth. With the experience of engaging numerous publishers each month, we understand the common dilemma: to build or to buy.? Or to combine both approaches? In this newsletter, we aim to equip you with insights and guidance to navigate this decision, highlighting the advantages and challenges of both approaches. And finally, explain how we solve this dilemma.

In-House Ad Management Solutions: Navigating the Pros and Cons

Building ad management solutions from the ground up offers publishers unparalleled customization and control over their ad operations. Yet, this path is fraught with challenges, from significant initial investments to ongoing maintenance demands. Let's break down the key points:

Advantages of Going In-House:

• Customization: Tailor every aspect of your ad management to fit your unique needs, from user experience to compliance with local laws.
• Independence: Reduce reliance on external vendors, potentially increasing data security and operational control;
• Expertise Development: Cultivate a team with deep ad tech knowledge, understanding your ecosystem inside out.
• Strategic Flexibility: Pivot your platform into a new business avenue, capitalizing on proprietary technology.

Challenges of Building In-House

• Resource Intensity: The commitment of time, talent, and capital is substantial, with ongoing updates and maintenance adding to the burden.
• innovation Pace: Keeping up with AI and machine learning advancements in ad tech can be daunting, risking falling behind on industry benchmarks.
• Operational Delays: Developing comprehensive solutions like analytics platforms or HB wrappers can take years, delaying benefit realization.
• Team Dependencies: Heavy reliance on a few key developers or project owners can pose risks of bottlenecking and knowledge loss.
• Compliance Risks: Ensuring data privacy and compliance with in-house solutions requires rigorous, ongoing attention.

Now, we will explore the flip side of the coin - the pros and cons of adopting third-party ad management software.

?The Case for Hiring External Ad Management Vendors

In the dynamic world of ad monetization, the decision to hire a SaaS ad management solution can be a game-changer for publishers. Let's dive into the benefits that come with choosing an external vendor.?

Benefits of third-party solutions

• Ease of Implementation: Third-party vendors have experienced setup processes, allowing you to kickstart revenue analysis across multiple streams - sometimes within minutes.

• All-in-One solution: You might find that you can replace multiple vendors with a single solution that combines more than eleven solutions, such as header bidding wrapper, web analytics, ad refresh, dynamic ad injection, lazy loading, dynamic flooring, IVT reporting, content analytics, smart layouts, reporting and more. Besides reducing ad tech costs, you will surely win operational efficiency.
• Constant Customization and Updates: Some platforms allow you to create unlimited custom variants, features, alerts, and dashboards. Or even to export data already normalized to your BI platform.?
• Access to Machine Learning: Unlike most in-house solutions, a purchased solution offers the advantage of cutting-edge machine learning capabilities, such as revenue prediction capability.?
• Constant Innovation in Optimization: A team of dedicated engineers consistently works on enhancing the platform based on client needs and evolving use cases.?
• Avoiding Development Challenges: Companies building their solutions may face challenges like unexpected layoffs of key engineers, leading to knowledge gaps. Adopting a purchased solution mitigates the risk of losing critical expertise and experiencing unforeseen errors.?
• Cost-efficiency: While building internally allows complete control, purchasing a solution eliminates the need for continuous development costs. The cost perspective favors buying, for all the reasons mentioned above.

Considering third-party solutions: potential drawbacks

While the advantages are compelling, it's also crucial to be mindful of the potential drawbacks of third-party solutions:

• Vendor Dependence: Ensure the solution's longevity and innovation pace by assessing the vendor's focus and commitment to publishers.
• Customization Limits: Evaluate the flexibility of the platform to meet your unique business requirements.
• Integration and Compatibility: Be prepared for integration efforts, ensuring seamless compatibility with your existing systems.
• Security and Compliance: Verify the vendor's adherence to GDPR and local privacy regulations to safeguard your data integrity.
• Service Reliability: Consider the vendor's track record for uptime and support responsiveness to mitigate potential service disruptions.

How are we bridging the gap between third-party and in-house solutions?

At Assertive Yield, we're dedicated to providing publishers with a robust ad management solution that combines the efficiency of third-party software with the customization and control of an in-house system. Our platform is engineered to address the unique challenges of ad monetization, offering you the best of both worlds. Customize according to your business needs, bidders, layouts, variants, segments, dashboards, alerts, and more.

Explore Assertive Yield's comprehensive suite designed for publishers. Reach out to me directly on LinkedIn to learn more or ask for a demo!

Stay connected for more insights and tips on maximizing your ad revenue.