The Public Policy of Distraction: Religion, Bollywood, and Cricket as Instruments of Control in India

The India-Pakistan cricket match is often billed as the "greatest rivalry" in sports—a clash of titans that grips millions with patriotic fervor and nail-biting tension. Yet, beneath the surface of this celebrated spectacle lies a provocative question: is the real scam not the hype of the match itself, but the broader system that props it up as a distraction? For 75 years, since India’s independence, three cultural juggernauts—religion, Bollywood, and cricket—have been wielded, knowingly or not, as tools of public policy. Far from mere entertainment or tradition, they function as an opiate, numbing the populace to the persistent failures of governance: inadequate water supply, crumbling infrastructure, substandard healthcare, and unequal education. At the heart of this machinery stands the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), the bureaucratic elite accused of shaping and sustaining this narrative to deflect demands for basic amenities.

This isn’t a conspiracy hatched in shadowy corridors but a self-perpetuating policy framework rooted in history, inertia, and pragmatism. By examining these three pillars as deliberate instruments of distraction, we uncover a scam far greater than any overhyped cricket rivalry—a systemic redirection of public energy away from accountability and toward spectacle.

Cricket: The Policy of National Catharsis

Cricket in India is more than a sport; it’s a national obsession, and the India-Pakistan match is its zenith. Televised to over a billion viewers, amplified by corporate sponsors, and dissected by a 24/7 media cycle, it’s a cultural juggernaut. But its role as a public policy tool lies in its ability to channel collective emotion into a controlled release. When India wins, euphoria sweeps the nation; when it loses, outrage unites it. In both cases, the focus shifts from the mundane realities of governance to a symbolic battlefield.

Historically, cricket’s rise aligns with India’s post-independence nation-building. The 1983 World Cup victory, under Kapil Dev, marked a turning point, cementing cricket as a unifying force in a diverse, fractured country. Governments and bureaucrats quickly recognized its utility. The IAS, tasked with implementing policy and managing public sentiment, found in cricket a low-cost, high-impact instrument. Stadiums were built, tournaments subsidized, and matches scheduled to coincide with moments of national unease—be it economic downturns or political scandals. The India-Pakistan fixture, with its baked-in historical baggage, became the crown jewel of this strategy.

From a policy perspective, cricket serves two ends: it pacifies and it postpones. A single match can drown out weeks of discontent over power cuts or flooded streets. The bureaucracy doesn’t need to micromanage this; the ecosystem—media, advertisers, and even players—self-regulates to keep the spectacle alive. The scam isn’t the rivalry’s hype; it’s how it’s leveraged to keep citizens cheering instead of questioning why their tax rupees don’t translate into functional public services.

Religion: The Sacred Lever of Governance

Religion in India is a tapestry of unparalleled richness—Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, Christianity, and more, interwoven with festivals, pilgrimages, and rituals. It’s also a potent policy instrument. Since 1947, successive governments have tapped into religious sentiment to consolidate power, defuse dissent, and shift focus from material deprivation. The IAS, as the administrative arm, has played a pivotal role in operationalizing this strategy, often under political direction but sometimes through its own initiative.

Consider the historical arc: the 1950s saw state-sponsored reconstruction of religious sites like the Somnath Temple, a signal of cultural reclamation post-colonialism. The 1980s witnessed the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, where religious fervor was stoked to overshadow economic woes. Today, mega-projects like the Ram Temple in Ayodhya or the Kashi Vishwanath corridor dominate public discourse, often timed to coincide with electoral cycles or policy failures. These aren’t random acts of piety—they’re calculated distractions.

The policy mechanism is subtle yet effective. Religious events—be it a Kumbh Mela or a communal flare-up—absorb public attention and resources. The IAS ensures logistical success (roads, security, sanitation) for these spectacles, earning goodwill while neglecting the same infrastructure in everyday contexts. Data backs this: a 2019 NITI Aayog report highlighted that 21% of rural households lack access to clean water, yet billions are spent on temporary setups for religious gatherings. The scam lies in the trade-off: citizens are left debating faith instead of demanding pipes that work year-round.

Bollywood: The Illusion of Empowerment

Bollywood, India’s cinematic powerhouse, churns out over 1,000 films annually, reaching every corner of the country. Its escapist allure—heroes vanquishing villains, love triumphing over odds—offers respite from daily struggles. As a public policy tool, it’s a masterstroke of soft power, projecting an idealized India while glossing over its cracks.

The state’s relationship with Bollywood is symbiotic. Post-independence, the Film Division, overseen by IAS officers, produced propaganda reels to shape national identity. Over time, this evolved into tacit support: tax breaks for film production, censorship to align narratives with state interests, and high-profile events like the International Film Festival of India. Bollywood stars, often cozy with political and bureaucratic elites, amplify government messaging—be it Swachh Bharat campaigns or patriotic blockbusters like Uri.

The policy payoff is twofold. First, Bollywood pacifies by offering catharsis—on-screen justice substitutes for real-world accountability. Second, it distracts by saturating media with star gossip and blockbuster hype. When a film grosses ?500 crore, it’s a national talking point; when a CAG report flags ?50,000 crore in misspent funds, it barely registers. The IAS, managing this cultural machinery, ensures the dream factory churns while schools and hospitals crumble.

The IAS: Architects of the Narrative

Central to this trifecta is the Indian Administrative Service, the bureaucratic spine of India since 1947. With its colonial roots in the Indian Civil Service, the IAS was designed to maintain order, not disrupt it. Post-independence, it inherited a nation of staggering diversity and poverty, tasked with balancing development and stability. Over 75 years, it’s honed a governance model that prioritizes optics over outcomes—a model where religion, Bollywood, and cricket are not just cultural artifacts but policy levers.

The IAS doesn’t script every cricket match or Bollywood plot; its role is structural. It allocates resources—funding a stadium over a sewage plant, fast-tracking a religious site over a rural clinic. It manages crises—deploying police for a film premiere or a festival while slums flood. Its officers, trained in elite academies, often view the masses as emotional, not analytical, best managed through sentiment rather than substance. A 2021 study by the Centre for Policy Research found that IAS-led districts prioritize “visible” projects (monuments, events) over “invisible” ones (sanitation, literacy), reinforcing this pattern.

This isn’t malice but inertia. The IAS benefits from a distracted public—less scrutiny means less pressure to overhaul a creaky system that sustains its privilege. Over decades, this has ossified into a 75-year narrative: keep the people praying, watching, cheering, and dreaming, so they don’t start asking why their roads are still mud after every monsoon.

The Bigger Scam: A Policy of Priorities

So, what’s a bigger scam than branding India-Pakistan cricket as the greatest rivalry? It’s the public policy framework that elevates cricket, religion, and Bollywood into a trinity of distraction, sidelining the essentials of governance. The India-Pakistan match is a symptom; the disease is a system that invests more in stadiums than schools, temples than taps, films than factories.

Imagine a counter-policy: redirecting the ?10,000 crore spent annually on cricket infrastructure toward rural electrification; channeling religious zeal into community welfare rather than divisive monuments; using Bollywood to educate, not just entertain. The scam isn’t the hype of a single rivalry—it’s the quiet theft of India’s potential, engineered through 75 years of misaligned priorities.

In this light, the greatest rivalry isn’t India vs. Pakistan. It’s the Indian people versus a governance model that keeps them enthralled instead of empowered. Until that changes, the real match remains unplayed—and unwon.

For Guest Lectures & Sustainability Requirements Contact

Dr Rakesh Varma Ex-IAS (VR)

+91- Nine four one five three three four four four Nine

Founder/ CEO AllCompliances.com?

[email protected]

Certified ESG Professional |Certified GRI Standards Sustainability Professional (CGSSP) |?

Govt. EGOsystem & ECOsystem Coder |?