The Psychology Behind Burnout (And How To Stave It Off)
I Love Lucy – h/t Nir Eyal's Indistractible

The Psychology Behind Burnout (And How To Stave It Off)

In the book Indistractible, behavior researcher Nir Eyal describes a scene in one of my favorite I Love Lucy episodes, which turns out to be the perfect example of the psychology of workplace burnout. In the episode Lucy and her husband Ricky get fed up with the state of things and decide to switch jobs. Lucy ends up working at a candy factory assembly line where this happens:

Chances are in 2020 you’ve felt a little like Lucy here as she chases the chocolates down the conveyor belt and can’t keep up. Only for you and me, there’s no audience of people laughing and enjoying this. We’re just scrambling, doing our best despite the fact that we have so little control over the speed of the conveyor belt—or in our case, the pandemic/economy/etc.

If you’re feeling burnt out, you’re not alone. According to Gallup research published shortly before the pandemic, ? of workers felt burnout symptoms. That percentage is surely higher now.

But what exactly leads us to want to throw in the towel because we’re emotionally exhausted at work? I believe that understanding how burnout works is the first step to managing it. And I Love Lucy nailed it 60 years ago:

To prevent burnout there needs to be a balance between control over the situation and hook for the consequences

Gallup’s research says that the following were the most impactful factors for employees who experienced burnout:

  • Unfair Treatment
  • Unmanageable Workload
  • Lack of Role Clarity
  • Lack of Communication & Support from Manager
  • Unreasonable Time Pressure

Lucy on the conveyor belt, after her boss yells at her and leaves, has both an unmanageable workload and unreasonable time pressure. Even though her role is clear, it’s not fair to put her on the hook for the consequences when the conveyor belt is running like that.

So How Can We Help Our Teams From Giving Up When Burnout Is Near?

This is a big question that I plan to address soon in a series of posts. (If you have insights or research on the topic, please share it in the comments and I will wrap them in.) But if there’s one overall principle to follow, it’s this: if your people are on the hook for the consequences and have no control over the way things go, give them more control or take them off the hook for the consequences.

For example, if a government decides to shut down small businesses in order to prevent people from dying, that’s just taken away control from those business owners—so the government should take away some consequences, e.g. by giving those businesses stimulus money.

Or if a company is struggling financially and employees are going to suffer no matter how hard they work at their jobs, give them more control over their situation, e.g. by letting them get involved in making strategic decisions about their teams or the company (rather than just telling them to do their job). 

These are not easy kinds of changes to make. But you don’t always have to make big, dramatic moves to give people more control or to reduce the consequences of things that aren’t in their control. Little things go a long way. 

Shane Snow is the bestselling author of Dream Teams and founder of the Snow Academy innovation and leadership skills center.

Joanne Garner

General Manager at MSA Bristol - The Safety Company (Yate)

3 年

A really interesting read. I agree that you cannot and should not be accountable for something which you/your department do not have control over.

Great review. I think one aspect that deserves a bit more attention is company culture. Often overly simplified as “toxic culture”, the name easily misses the adverse effect of “positive culture” when interpreting as a mandate to only express problems as positive opportunities. That can lead to suppression of critical thinking and especially passionate employees can feel discouraged. They eventually burn out when their initiatives bear no fruit.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了