Psychological Safety: How to Unlock Team Potential.

Psychological Safety: How to Unlock Team Potential.

This is a summary of an article I published last week on leadingmatters.substack.com, where you can find the article and sign up for my newsletter Leading Matters.

On August 6, 1997, Korean Air Flight 801 approached Guam International Airport in heavy rain. Despite growing concerns about the captain's misinterpretation of landing guidance, the first officer and flight engineer hesitated to directly challenge their superior. Their reluctance wasn't due to incompetence but stemmed from Korea's hierarchical culture that discourages questioning authority. Minutes later, the aircraft crashed into Nimitz Hill, killing 228 people.

This tragedy exemplifies what happens when psychological safety is absent. When team members fear speaking up—even when lives are at stake—catastrophic failure becomes not just possible, but probable.

Psychological safety is the shared belief among team members that they can take interpersonal risks without facing negative consequences to their self-image, status, or career. It's an environment where people feel secure being vulnerable, speaking up, making mistakes, and being their authentic selves.

Harvard professor Amy Edmondson, who pioneered research in this field, defines it as "a belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes."

Several key principles underpin psychological safety's importance:

  • Trust drives performance and innovation. Google's Project Aristotle identified psychological safety as the most crucial factor in high-performing teams, outweighing even individual talent.
  • Learning requires comfort with failure. Organizations that punish mistakes drive problems underground, preventing valuable learning.
  • Diverse perspectives strengthen decisions. Teams make better decisions when they consider multiple viewpoints, but only when everyone feels safe to contribute.
  • Fear inhibits creativity and collaboration. Social threat activates the same brain regions as physical danger, diminishing cognitive capacity.
  • Psychological safety enables productive conflict. Teams with high psychological safety engage in constructive debate about ideas rather than attacking people.

Research points to several effective strategies:

  • Frame work as learning opportunities rather than performance evaluations
  • Practice conversational turn-taking to ensure equitable participation
  • Respond to failure with curiosity instead of blame
  • Model vulnerability by acknowledging your own limitations
  • Establish norms that encourage speaking up, like "no interruption" rules

Beyond preventing catastrophic failures, psychological safety drives organizational success. Edmondson's research shows that psychologically safe teams experience fewer errors, higher productivity, greater innovation, better employee retention, and more effective adaptation to change.

Following the Flight 801 tragedy, Korean Air transformed its culture, implementing crew resource management training and removing status barriers in communication. The airline evolved from having one of the worst safety records to becoming an industry leader, proving that even deeply ingrained cultural barriers to psychological safety can be overcome.

When team members fear judgment, they hide mistakes and avoid necessary risks. Creating psychological safety means actively demonstrating that vulnerability is welcomed and mistakes are viewed as learning opportunities. The evidence is clear: psychological safety isn't just a nice-to-have—it's a business imperative that drives performance, innovation, and resilience.

Leading Matters is the trusted source for aspiring and seasoned leaders alike, providing them with the tools, insights, and inspiration to become intentional leaders that build more innovative, engaging, and agile organizations. #innovation #transformation #founders #CEOs #failure #leadingmatters #failfast #learning #biases #leaders #leading

要查看或添加评论,请登录

William Kilmer的更多文章

  • The Discipline of Failure

    The Discipline of Failure

    Hi everyone. After nearly a year of writing the weekly newsletter Leading Matters on Substack, I've decided to add a…

  • How to Approach Uncertainty as a Leader

    How to Approach Uncertainty as a Leader

    If you’re like a lot of leaders, you’re looking at 2024 as uncertain. There are some positive economic signs, an upward…

    2 条评论
  • How to Improve Culture in Hybrid Work

    How to Improve Culture in Hybrid Work

    As I run workshops organizational culture, one of the most frequent questions I get is how to build a strong culture in…

    1 条评论
  • How Culture Drives Differentiation

    How Culture Drives Differentiation

    The second way that culture creates an advantage is that culture can be a true differentiator in organizations. This…

  • Understanding the Value of Culture on Performance

    Understanding the Value of Culture on Performance

    Recognizing the positive impact of culture is essential to a willingness to invest in building a strong organizational…

  • The Unifying Power of Leadership

    The Unifying Power of Leadership

    If you’ve watched Ted Lasso you know that it’s not about a small-time American football coach hired to manage a Premier…

  • SVB and the Diversity and Inclusion Myth

    SVB and the Diversity and Inclusion Myth

    Sometimes a falsehood is so wrong that it needs to be called out. This is one of those times.

    13 条评论
  • Use the Right Tools to Engage Your Team in Setting 2023 Priorities

    Use the Right Tools to Engage Your Team in Setting 2023 Priorities

    My experience is that leaders would like to engage their team more in substantive discussions, that result in…

  • Elon Musk, Twitter, and the Outsider's Mindset.

    Elon Musk, Twitter, and the Outsider's Mindset.

    While it now looks like Elon Musk’s very public on-again, off-again acquisition of #Twitter will be settled in the…

  • Why Even the Best Case for VCs is Bad for Startups

    Why Even the Best Case for VCs is Bad for Startups

    Over the last few weeks I’ve spent a lot of time talking to about a dozen startups and quite a few VC investors. And…

    2 条评论