The Projections must be adjusted – again

The Projections must be adjusted – again

It is tiresome, but the historic US COVID-19 mortality record has had to be adjusted again. This is yet another reporting malfunction, supposedly now accounting for the new requirements that all deaths that occur from COVID-19 like symptoms are now counted as a COVID-19 death. The adjusted graph of the mortality growth rate is shown above. The decline in growth of the death rate is now showing significantly slower than our original runs, and this will undoubtedly impact the estimates of total mortality negatively. Below is our adjusted graph of weekly mortality. It shows a frustratingly slow decline in the daily death rate.

No alt text provided for this image

Is the mortality high?

There is a great deal of debate on when to lift the enforced shutdowns. We are researching the literature on the subject, particularly in the light of the changes in the mortality reporting. What we are able to do, is compare the mortality of COVID-19 to pandemics over the last 100 years, adjusted for population. That is illustrated in the graph below.

No alt text provided for this image

It can be clearly seen, that in the US, the “Stay at Home” policies have insured that the COVID-19 mortality has remained well within the limits of what we have experienced from other, supposedly more benign, viruses.

However, if we compare these pandemics to the Spanish Flu of 1918-1919, then the difference is dramatic, as illustrated by the following - shocking - comparison. Clearly we seem to be avoiding the worst case outcome.

No alt text provided for this image

Some emergent data

Antibody test results are beginning to emerge…Governor Cuomo cited a New York study showing that 1 in 5 people in New York City tested had antibodies for the coronavirus; A Stanford antibody study last week in Santa Clara County in California estimated 2.49% and 4.16% of the population had been infected—50 to 85 times more than the official confirmed cases. Other studies, all in the early stages of formalization, seem to confirm that there are a multiple of people infected than we had previously thought.

There is a great deal of push-back to these early reports, but our assessment is that this is mainly politically driven, given the fraught political environment. We strongly subscribe to the emergent view that the virus is significantly less deadly (to those that are healthy and are under 75). This was our view originally, which is why we have been largely ignoring the published infection rates in making our projections. 

However, this is only one factor in making policy regarding how to proceed. Another is whether it is possible, and with what frequency and risk, to be re-infected with the virus. And finally, what treatment and vaccines are emerging or likely to emerge, and over what time frame.

It's a very complex subject, and there is so much that is unknowable, particularly about timing.

Further, the profound impact of the global recession - likely depression - which we have now entered, is going to be much more deadly than COVID-19. Depressions are more often than not followed by war, and that would be truly cataclysmic.

In the meantime, battle lines are being drawn around this subject on purely political lines. It's terribly sad. If ever in modern times we have needed to make really good decisions, this is the time. Instead we resort to petty political bickering. We are carefully researching the issue to formulate our own views, and look forward to sharing these shortly.

The US European Comparison

Each time we report, we track the comparative US v European COVID-19 mortality reports.

We now learn that the German data may contain the same error factors as the original US mortality data – Bloomberg is reporting that “Germany’s unusually low mortality rate may be helped by the fact that the country only counts deaths that have a positive virus test.” (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-25/why-the-world-s-highest-virus-death-rate-is-in-europe-s-capital)

This is redolent of the tiresome restatements that we have undergone in the US mortality count: however, the differences in the German mortality rate and everywhere else seems to very significantly outweigh that factor. One way or another, it illustrates just how difficult really accounting for the damage done by this virus.

As we have done before, it is important to state that the reason the USA is performing so much better than Europe may be due to many factors besides political policy and its execution: regardless, the comparisons need be made on equivalent populations. The projection for total death by country is based on IHME statistical analysis (https://www.healthdata.org/), and were updated on 4/25/2019.  

No alt text provided for this image

Historic information is downloaded from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Fred Simkin

Developing and delivering knowledge based automated decisioning solutions for the Industrial and Agricultural spaces.

4 年

Larry I would go easy on reliance on the "Stanford Santa Clara" study. As was pointed out today in the Times, the work that was published is a non peer reviewed "preprint" "There were at least 480 comments posted on the first version of the study that went online. The very first one raised doubts about the researchers’ methodology. It was posted by one of the study’s participants. " ".. critics raising issues with the researchers’ recruitment method (Facebook ads), flaws in their statistical methods, and even the tests themselves — manufactured in China, and since banned from export." 'The tests are known to generate false positives up to 1.7 percent of the time. Given that the Stanford study originally identified 1.5 percent of its participants as having the antibody, critics pointed out that in theory, every single one might have been a false positive. The tests are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and a subcommittee in the House of Representatives opened an investigation into four vendors of antibody tests, including Premier Biotech, the maker of the tests used in the Stanford study."

回复

thank-you for the updated analysis.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Larry Goldberg的更多文章

  • Is Your Startup Already Obsolete?

    Is Your Startup Already Obsolete?

    A venture fund in which I am an LP recently invited me to a meeting with one of their companies who were asking for a…

    5 条评论
  • Roadtrip!

    Roadtrip!

    ROADTRIP! I’m setting off on my third cross country road trip in my Tesla Model X. The plan is to highlight for…

    10 条评论
  • An Adjustment in Projections

    An Adjustment in Projections

    Finally, IHME have adjusted their projections for mortality, in line with the reality that has been evolving. We have…

    7 条评论
  • A Tale of Two Countries

    A Tale of Two Countries

    It's as if Americans are living in two countries. Almost half the nation live in States that are experiencing a lower…

    6 条评论
  • Is Elon Musk Right?

    Is Elon Musk Right?

    Unlike many a public company CEO, Elon Musk is not given to guarded, carefully worded statements that hint at his…

    1 条评论
  • A New Vital Statistic

    A New Vital Statistic

    The CDC provides an estimate of the “Number of excess deaths”, prepared by the NCHS (National Center for Health…

  • It's Time To Re-evaluate

    It's Time To Re-evaluate

    The growth rate of mortality in the US continues to fall; we have reached a rate of 5%, with ever smaller increments…

    1 条评论
  • When can we relax the quarantine?

    When can we relax the quarantine?

    The graph above is a continuation of the tracking we have been doing of the day-to-day increase in the number of deaths…

    2 条评论
  • COVID-19 Reporting Changes with Significant Impact on Mortality Rates

    COVID-19 Reporting Changes with Significant Impact on Mortality Rates

    Huge adjustments made to the numbers To those following these posts – apologies for the lack of reporting over the last…

  • Today may not be good…and the foolish statements fools make

    Today may not be good…and the foolish statements fools make

    The numbers continued to be good through the 13th, maintaining the trend, but today, on the 14thof May. It’s beginning…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了