Project Management: at a tipping point?

Project Management: at a tipping point?

My favourite cartoonist is Gary Larson. I am sure that those of you who are familiar with his?Far Side?series, which often put animals in a human context, would agree they are sometimes sublime. Those of you reading this who haven’t found the joy of Larson please check him out on the Web. The reason I am talking about Gary Larson whenever I am thinking about the future and tipping points, I am reminded of one of his cartoons which shows dinosaurs pointing and laughing at a small warm-blooded hedgehog-like creature while one of the dinosaurs is looking at a snow-flake drifting onto his claw .. subtle but powerful.

I have spent a lot of time together with Seven Consulting’s M.D., Gareth James, thinking about the future of Project Management. I promised in my last article that I would be posting a series of articles about what we are learning about possible futures but, given it is near Christmas, I will defer these articles until early 2023.

However, similar to the dinosaurs just before the Ice Age in Larson’s cartoon, we suspect that the world of business and IT project management is at a tipping point.?

I’ll detail why we are thinking this in the following articles but to set the scene I want to share an observation.??Warning! This will be a quick and hopefully not boring trip into the past .. well??.. my past to be specific.

I started in IT as a programmer in 1969 in the Australian Bureau of which in those days was one of the three major computer centres for all the Australian government. There was no role called project manager and the standard planning activities i.e. scheduling, costing etc were performed by Senior Programmers.??In 1973, after a couple of significant computer project disasters, the Audit Office recommended that the Australian Government adopt formal “project management”. As it turned out I had moved to the Public Service Board in a standards-type role and my team conducted the first 5-day Project Management Workshop for all government departments in 1974. The basic project management body of knowledge we used came from the UK and US governments.?

What we taught in those days would be very familiar to all project managers today. Gantt Charts, network schedule dependencies, estimation techniques, cost management, status reporting, stakeholder engagement (albeit crudely), people leadership and so on.?

On a side note, the PMI was formed in 1969 and in 1981 began to formalise project management bodies of knowledge which eventually were published as PMBOK 1 in 1996 (earlier versions were available as various white-papers).?The first PMBOK was almost identical to what we taught in the 1970’s.

The core technology used in the 1970’s was main-frames (tape drives, disc-drives came later) that filled entire basements and could process 1 million instructions per second. Today’s super-computers can achieve 500 petaflops/second (one thousand million million!). IT technology has evolved rapidly over at least 4 major generations since early centralised 1970 “big iron” to a cloud-based virtual organism.

This exponential growth rate of evolution in technology raises a very interesting question … how has project management evolved? Yet another related question also comes to mind … does project management even need to evolve???

Short answer to the first question is that there has been?very little?evolution in project management over 5 decades. Second answer, it has to evolve radically given the future advances in both technology and the organisational context.?

What about Agile some of you are asking???As we’ll argue in the following articles, Agile is not a revolution but a natural, and not so radical, evolution from many early attempts starting in the late 1980’s to address the short-comings of an over-bureaucratised water-fall model.??Further, the emergence of Agile has raised serious and, in many cases, unresolved questions around the potential conflict and confusion of roles of a Project Manager versus Product Owner, Scrum Master, ART engineer, self-organising teams and so on.

Obviously, we are not saying that prevailing project management practices haven’t worked … they clearly have.

What we believe is that accelerating advances in AI, digital technology, programming environments, social media, global uncertainty and so on are already enabling types of project, products and team dynamics that will challenge many existing beliefs and practices in project management .. a tipping point is here.

So, nothing too controversial to finish of 2022?:-).

I am sure that for most of us, 2022 was a very difficult and challenging year and I wish all those who follow my writings a safe, healthy and loving Christmas break and see you all in a better 2023.

Footnote

Oh! Gary Larson has requested that folks don’t put his cartoons on the Internet but for dog and or cat lovers please check out Google for??“What we say to dogs and what they hear” and its companion cartoon “What we say to cats and what they hear”.??As a person who shares his home with a dog and a cat … simply wonderful.

EJ K.

Program/project management professional

2 年

Looking forward to this year's instalments Rob Thomsett. Can't help ponder "the more things change, the more they stay the same". The difference between project management and the role of a project manager appears to often be confused from my vantage point and all hands on deck feeling of the myriad versions of agile further blurs things. Remember a similar conversation in the early noughties during some RAD training you were facilitating in Canberra??

回复
Colin Segota

Head of IT Vendor Management, Governance & Service Management

2 年

Couldn’t agree more Rob & looking forward to your next series of articles.

回复
Sue Westmore

Senior Project Manager at Infosys

2 年

Look forward to the series next year, Rob. One of my general observations is that everyone thinks they’re a project manager & that this has devalued the skills that should be core to the role, almost irrespective of which delivery methodology is adopted (for me, this is one of the first stakes in the ground to agree which methodology is appropriate for the organisation, the team, outside influences etc, and a PM should be open to this discussion with the relevant pros & cons for the project in question).

回复
John Middlemist

PMO Director at Seven Consulting

2 年

Rob Thomsett , as always love your articles and the debate they drive. With respect to the “short-comings of an over-bureaucratised water-fall model” would love to hear more on that topic as I still believe this model has a place - maybe I’m old school but seen the failures of agile as well ?? Chat more in 2023 - all the best

回复
Srinivas Chillara

Principal Consultant at SwanSpeed: Rightsourcing, Time Series Forecasting and Anomaly Detection

2 年

Very germane Qs upstairs and I'm sure there will be some (candidate) answers in your writings, come 2023. Just wondering if the pendulum isn't moving far too much towards softer aspects of Project Management? (I don't think so) but are people forgetting the hard aspects!?! At the same time I find the lack of awareness or understanding of complexity/chaos dispiriting. Too many people commonly over-simplify or over-complicate the analysis of project situations, often in the wrong circumstances. ( I completely agree that 'agile' - whatever that means - is an evolution; However for many who haven't been alert, when understanding Scrum it can seem like a revolution, or more and more these days, simply like some more woolly buzzword laden fad)

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Rob Thomsett的更多文章

  • Are great project managers also great people leaders? Episode 2

    Are great project managers also great people leaders? Episode 2

    “The greatest people are self-managing; they don’t need to be managed.” Steve Jobs Previously in this series … I’ll…

    17 条评论
  • Are great project managers also great people leaders? Episode 1

    Are great project managers also great people leaders? Episode 1

    “A leader is best when people barely know the leader exists, when the leader’s work is done, the leader’s aim…

    13 条评论
  • Soft is really Hard – Part 2

    Soft is really Hard – Part 2

    In Part 1 of this little series, I had a small rant about the prevailing concept in our project management world that…

    25 条评论
  • Soft is really Hard – Part 1

    Soft is really Hard – Part 1

    Fair warning – some contentious material follows :-) As many of my regular readers already know, I am what is termed an…

    12 条评论
  • What can dogs teach us about project management?

    What can dogs teach us about project management?

    This is a longer article than usual. I’d like you to work with me here as I am taking you on a bit of a winding journey…

    18 条评论
  • Change is scary .. let’s face it.

    Change is scary .. let’s face it.

    “The measure of intelligence is the ability to change” – Albert Einstein In a recent Harvard Business Review article it…

    14 条评论
  • Crossing the line: a PM’s Perfect Storm

    Crossing the line: a PM’s Perfect Storm

    Many of you will be familiar with the movie The Perfect Storm directed by Wolfgang Petersen and starring George…

    18 条评论
  • It’s all about the Big Picture

    It’s all about the Big Picture

    “There are three causes for every problem – people, people, people.’’ G.

    13 条评论
  • Simple Words, Fog Words

    Simple Words, Fog Words

    As we approach the end of what has been a difficult year for many of us, I am going to devote my last, very short post…

    17 条评论
  • Managing the White Space

    Managing the White Space

    Let’s start with a question for you. “How many times have you fronted up to a Sponsor or Steering Committee to explain…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了