Progressing the Stalemate: Challenging Male Privilege to Combat Trafficking of Women

Introduction

The trafficking of women for sexual exploitation is a grave issue that has polarised societies and led to a more than 20-year stalemate between pro-prostitution and anti-prostitution groups. I have personally witnessed over 20 years the destruction of women and families because of the sexual exploitation of women. But in wanting to see this end, we have all been held hostage by that stalemate. The core disagreement lies in the clash between the individual right of a woman to sell her body and the collective rights of women not to be subjected to such exploitation. However, to break free from this impasse and make real progress, we must do as diplomats do every single day and reframe the argument. After all, there would have been no Good Friday Agreement without this stalemate-busting technique.

Instead of focusing on reducing women's rights and options, let us shift the premise towards targeting male privilege and challenging the claim that men have a right to buy women's bodies. Men's rights in this domain conceptually exist on a spectrum from carte blanche with women's bodies at one end, to strong limits and refutation of the right at the other. By turning our focus to this spectrum, we will not just remove the stalemate, changing the tectonics, but it will open up a whole new world of policy options.

In doing so, we can address the root causes of trafficking in women for sexual exploitation - which accounts for up to 90% of women in prostitution - and work towards a society that upholds gender equality and human dignity for all. We can stop the 10% holding the 90% hostage and make progress for the 100%.

Understanding the Stalemate

A. The Pro-Prostitution vs. Anti-Prostitution Divide

The pro-prostitution and anti-prostitution lobbies have long been at odds over their conflicting views on the sex industry. The pro-prostitution side argues for the individual rights of women to engage in sex work and control their bodies. On the other hand, the anti-prostitution advocates prioritise the collective rights of women, emphasising that prostitution industrialises the sexuality of women, commodifies women, increases the exploitation and trafficking of women, and we need systemically, not individually, protect he vulnerable individuals from exploitation. This divide has hindered progress in addressing the systemic issue of trafficking, perpetuating a stalemate that seems impossible to overcome: two corners like a boxing ring. But, of course, a literal boxing "ring" would have no corners. Let's look at that by changing the parameters.

B. The Need for a Paradigm Shift

At present, the stalemate can largely be characterised as two groups of mostly female advocates from civil society and academia on both sides, with a few male supporters diametrically opposed in favour of or against prostitution, unable to find common ground. To move forward, we must recognise that the current debate perpetuates a false dichotomy, pitting individual rights against collective rights. This impasse limits our ability to make meaningful changes and ignores the underlying power dynamics and gender inequalities that drive the demand for trafficked women. By reframing the argument, we can redirect our efforts towards a more productive and inclusive approach.

Challenging Male Privilege

A. The Role of Male Privilege in Trafficking

Male privilege plays the single-most leading, causal role in perpetuating the demand for trafficked women. It is essential to acknowledge that the majority of buyers in the sex trade are men, the majority of women in prostitution are likely trafficked, while the overwhelming majority of those trafficked are female. The existing power imbalances and societal norms that prioritise male entitlement and sexual objectification create an environment where the exploitation of women becomes normalised. Challenging male privilege is crucial to dismantling this harmful cycle.

B. Redefining Masculinity and Shifting Societal Norms

To effectively combat the trafficking of women for sexual exploitation, we must challenge traditional notions of masculinity and redefine what it means to be a man in society. By promoting healthy and respectful relationships, providing consent education, reducing objectification and commodification, and promoting gender equality, we can reshape societal norms and expectations. It is essential to engage men as allies in this fight, encouraging them to question and reject the notion that they have a right to buy women's bodies. When men reject the notion that they have a right to buy women, change happens, as we have seen in Sweden. Countries in which policy-makers send the message to men that buying women is their right, such as Germany, suffer rampant trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Initiatives that promote positive masculinity and foster empathy can create lasting change and reduce the demand for trafficked women.

C. Addressing the Vulnerabilities

Addressing the root cause of male demand, does not mean we stop addressing the push factors. Challenging male privilege requires addressing the root causes that contribute to the demand for trafficked women. This includes tackling poverty, inequality, and limited economic opportunities that push individuals into vulnerable situations. By providing access to education, job training, and economic empowerment, we can alleviate the underlying factors that make women susceptible to exploitation. Additionally, addressing social norms and harmful cultural practices that perpetuate gender inequalities is crucial in reducing the demand for trafficking.

Collaboration for Change - the ABCs

A. Governmental Policies and Legislation

Governments have a critical role to play in combating trafficking and challenging male privilege. They must develop comprehensive policies that prioritise prevention, victim support, and the prosecution of traffickers and buyers. Legislative measures should focus on targeting the demand side of trafficking. This includes criminalising and stigmatising - making the act socially unacceptable - the purchase of sexual services and implementing strict penalties for buyers. Such laws send a clear message that the exploitation of women will not be tolerated and that the responsibility lies with those who created the institution and perpetuate the demand. Governments must also allocate resources to law enforcement agencies, ensuring they have the necessary tools and training to effectively combat trafficking networks.

B. International Cooperation and Collaboration

Trafficking is a global issue that requires international cooperation and collaboration. Governments, NGOs, and civil society organisations must work together to share information, best practices, and resources. At the moment, these communities are 100% divided. If we change the premise, that does not necessarily have to be so any more. Genuine collaborative efforts can lead to more effective policies, improved victim support systems, and enhanced cross-border law enforcement. Additionally, addressing the root causes of trafficking, such as poverty and gender inequality, necessitates a comprehensive and coordinated global response.

C. Education and Awareness Campaigns

Education and awareness campaigns play a vital role in challenging societal norms and reducing the demand for trafficked women. These campaigns should target both men and women, emphasising the importance of consent, respect, and gender equality. Educational institutions should incorporate comprehensive sex education programs that address the realities of trafficking and promote healthy relationships. By fostering critical thinking and empathy, we can empower individuals to reject the objectification of women and actively work towards a society free from exploitation. We all want to same thing; let's just change the premise to address blame where it stands.

D. Support for Survivors and Rehabilitation Programs

Supporting survivors of trafficking remains crucial. Governments and organisations should provide comprehensive services, including safe housing, medical and psychological support, legal aid, and vocational training. Survivor-led organisations should be supported and empowered to advocate for policy changes and provide peer support to survivors. Exit strategies, education, housing, and job-skills are vital elements of an change. Rehabilitation programs should focus on empowering survivors to rebuild their lives, regain control, and reintegrate into society.

Conclusion

The more than 20-year stalemate between the pro-prostitution and anti-prostitution lobbies regarding the trafficking of women for sexual exploitation has desperately undermined progress in addressing this critical issue. To move forward, we must shift seismically the focus from reducing women's rights to challenging male privilege and addressing the demand side of trafficking. By challenging societal norms, redefining masculinity, and targeting the root causes that contribute to the demand for trafficked women, we can make significant strides towards ending this abhorrent practice.

This paradigm shift requires collaboration, both nationally and internationally, among governments, NGOs, and civil society organisations. It necessitates comprehensive policies and legislation that prioritize prevention, victim support, and the prosecution of traffickers and buyers. It also requires education and awareness campaigns that promote healthy relationships, consent, and gender equality. It means both sides of the current stalemate have to put their swords down for a moment and reflect to find common ground; the single objective of women's equality remains the same; it is all just about the how.

Support for survivors and rehabilitation programs is crucial in empowering individuals to rebuild their lives and reintegrate into society. By addressing the systemic issue of trafficking and challenging male privilege, we can create a future where the exploitation of women is eradicated, and gender equality and human dignity prevail.

Let's seize this opportunity to change the foundation of the argument and work together towards a society that upholds the rights and well-being of all individuals, regardless of gender. Only through collective action and a commitment to challenging male privilege can we make substantial progress in combating the trafficking of women for sexual exploitation.

Shall we change the premise to move forward?

#CombatingTrafficking #ChallengingMalePrivilege #GenderEqualityProgress #EndSexualExploitation