Programmatic vs. Sporadic M&A: What's the Difference?

In the world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), companies can take different approaches. Two common strategies are programmatic and sporadic M&A. But what sets them apart?

Programmatic M&A

This approach is all about consistency and strategy. Companies pursuing programmatic M&A make multiple acquisitions over time, often smaller or mid-sized deals. These acquisitions align with a clear strategic vision and are executed with a well-defined process. Think of it as adding building blocks to a larger structure.

Key characteristics of programmatic M&A:

• Frequency: Multiple deals over time, typically more than two per year.
• Size: Often smaller or mid-sized deals, but the cumulative impact is significant.
• Strategy: Aligned with a clear long-term strategic vision. For example, a software company might acquire smaller companies with complementary technologies to expand its product offerings and market share.
• Process: Well-defined and repeatable, with dedicated teams and resources. They have a playbook for due diligence, integration, etc.
• Integration: Focus on integrating acquired companies effectively to realise synergies and avoid cultural clashes.

Example: Constellation Software, a Canadian software conglomerate, is a prime example of programmatic M&A. They consistently acquire vertical market software businesses, integrating them into their portfolio and leveraging their expertise to drive growth.

Sporadic M&A

This approach is more opportunistic and less frequent. Companies pursue deals as they arise, often larger or transformational acquisitions. These deals may not always fit neatly into a pre-defined strategy, and the focus is often on seizing immediate opportunities. This is more like a one-off, "game-changing" move.

Key characteristics of sporadic M&A:

• Frequency: Infrequent and opportunistic.
• Size: Can range from small to large, but often includes larger, transformational deals.
• Strategy: May be less clearly defined, with a focus on seizing immediate opportunities, such as entering a new market or acquiring a competitor's key asset.
• Process: Can be less structured, with more reliance on external advisors. The urgency of the deal may require a more ad-hoc approach.
• Integration: May be less of a focus, especially with larger deals where the acquired company is often kept separate (at least initially).

Example: Facebook's acquisition of Instagram is a classic example of a sporadic, strategic acquisition. At the time, Instagram was a rapidly growing photo-sharing app, but not yet a dominant force. Facebook's acquisition was a bold move to neutralise a potential competitor and gain access to a valuable and expanding user base, particularly among younger demographics. While Facebook has made other acquisitions, the Instagram purchase was a significant, one-off event that dramatically reshaped the social media landscape. It wasn't part of a regular, predictable pattern of M&A activity.

Which approach is right for your company?

The best approach depends on various factors, including your company's size, industry, strategic goals, and risk tolerance. Programmatic M&A can be a powerful engine for growth and value creation, but it requires a disciplined approach and significant resources. Sporadic M&A can be more flexible and opportunistic, but it also carries higher risks.

#MA #mergersandacquisitions #programmaticMA #sporadicMA #businessstrategy #corporatestrategy #M&Aexamples #acquisitivegrowth