A Profound Embarrassment

A Profound Embarrassment

This story is from our May 2023 issue of?The Brief—C&E's monthly newsletter covering professional and scholarly communication.?Read the full issue here.


A Profound Embarrassment

Public trust in scientific research,?which is in decline for various reasons, took another?blow this month due to widespread publicity offered to?a methodologically flawed preprint?offering specious claims that one-third of neuroscience papers and one-quarter of medical papers were fraudulent. University of Washington biologist?Carl Bergstrom offers a fairly succinct explanation?of why the preprint’s claims are both nonsensical and have “racist consequences.” The study relies on two criteria to label a paper as fraudulent (neither of which involve evaluating the paper itself):

  1. An author on the paper uses a private (non-institutional) email address and/or has an affiliation with a hospital
  2. There are no international coauthors on the paper...


Read the full story?and others from our May issue of?The Brief.?Subscribe today?to have the next issue delivered right to your inbox.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了