The Productivity Plateau: Unraveling the Interplay between Inexperienced Workers, Generative AI, and Stalled Improvement in Modern Manufacturing
Michael Carroll
Global Executive in Industrial Innovation & AI Research | Industrial Transformation Leader | Board Advisor | Keynote Speaker & Columnist | Chairman, CEO, COO, CFO, CIO | Co-Founder & Startup Advisor| Hi-Performing Teams
Introduction
Manufacturing industries in this country have been stuck in a rut for over a decade. This slowdown, known as the productivity plateau, began in 2010. Since then, these industries have struggled to achieve the growth they once enjoyed. Many managers believe that the latest trends, such as generative AI models, might be the solution to this problem. However, the issue may be more complicated than that.
Is the Problem Inexperienced Employees or Adaptive Capacity: Incomplete and Unevenly Distributed Knowledge?
In modern workplaces, especially in industries where complex tasks and continuous adaptability are necessary, it's vital to recognize that while inexperienced employees are certainly a factor, they are not the sole contributor to the need for adaptive capacity in the operational model. Defining the problem merely as "inexperienced employees" can be dimensionally restrictive, focusing only on personnel and not on the broader challenges of the operational model. This narrow view may be typical of organizations that lack systems thinking and focus on symptoms and solutions one level removed from the true expression of the outcome. The relationship between inexperience and adaptive capacity is systemic, encompassing both individual and organizational components:
The Individual Impact:
Lack of Adaptive Capacity in Inexperienced Employees
Inexperienced employees, by definition, lack the seasoned expertise and refined skill set that comes with time and practice. This inexperience manifests itself in several ways:
The Systemic Impact:
Lack of Adaptive Capacity as a Systemic Effect
Beyond the individual challenges posed by inexperienced employees, a broader, systemic problem affects the entire operational model of an organization. The lack of adaptive capacity has profound implications:
Recognizing the multifaceted nature of the issue—where inexperienced employees are but one component of a larger challenge—enables leaders to address root causes rather than just the symptoms. This comprehensive understanding can pave the way for more effective strategies, fostering the evolution of a genuinely adaptive and forward-thinking organization.
The Technology Fix?
The intersection of inexperienced employees and a lack of adaptive capacity presents a complex systemic challenge that reaches far beyond individuals. It's a problem that affects the very operational model of an organization. Strategies must be implemented to enhance training, support growth, and facilitate the transfer of knowledge and skills. Recognizing and addressing this systemic issue is vital for any organization striving to maintain efficiency, innovation, and a robust and responsive operational model. By investing in the development of inexperienced employees, an organization can foster the adaptive capacity needed to thrive in a complex and ever-changing business environment.
领英推荐
Three Stages in Skill Acquisition:
Generative AI Applied to The Productivity Plateau
For many grappling with a decline in productivity improvement, generative AI models are considered as potential solutions. However, there's a mismatch between the tool and the complex problem, highlighting that adaptive capacity requires more than just data-driven insights. The shortcomings of generative AI models in addressing the productivity plateau include:
Insights and Perspectives: Not Enough for Adaptive Capacity
Challenges related to integrating technology and traditional manufacturing skills create barriers in training and development, hinder innovation, affect morale, and lead to a loss of institutional knowledge. At some point, humans will always have to intervene to make it work.
Conclusion
The productivity plateau in manufacturing is a complex and multifaceted issue that began around 2010 and continues to challenge the industry. Relying on generative AI models alone is insufficient to reverse this stall, as they lack the adaptive capacity and human participation needed to navigate intricate challenges. Managers must acknowledge the invaluable asset of experienced employees, whose availability will likely continue diminish in the future. A balanced approach, integrating both technological advances and human expertise, appears to be the most promising path forward. The true winners will be those who transcend generative AI to embrace Automated Reasoning and full Special Purpose Intelligence for the enterprise. In an ever-changing world, clinging to unproven assumptions or over-relying on a single solution could exacerbate the problem. As Arthur Kordon insightfully stated, becoming adept at generative AI is "the end of your beginning." It's time for the manufacturing sector to appreciate the complexities of the issue and adopt a more nuanced and holistic strategy, potentially paving the way to overcome the productivity plateau. Perhaps time has already passed you by if you are only just now exploring generative AI?
Shelley Nandkeolyar Ron Norris Subrata Sen Harirajan Padmanabhan Arthur Kordon Rajib Saha John B. Vicente Jr. PhD Sarath Chandershaker parabole.ai
#ModernCorporations #Leadership #SystemsThinking #CorporateCulture #ChangeManagement #generativeai #AutomatedReasoning #deeplearning #aiinmanufacturing #artificialintelligence #machinelearning #SpecialPurposeIntelligence #manufacturinginnovation #supplychainoptimization #datascience #industrydisruption #technologytransformation #productengineering #productionoptimization #digitaltransformation #tripleleaprevolution #deepautomation #causalintelligence #ChatGPT #AI #causality #causalinference #CEO #CIO
#TRAIN #AIRevolution #EnterpriseAI #ManufacturingExcellence #EnergyInnovation #FutureProofing #OT #IT #causality #generativeAI #industrial #SCM #Supplychain #MES #reliabilityEngineeting #productionIntelligence #APM #ProcessControl #AI #Controlsystem #processmanufacturing #industry40 #automation #decisionIntelligence #decisionanalytics #oilandgas #energy #chemical #futureofenergy #digitaltransformation #sustainability #causalAI #industrialautomation #industry50 #ArtificialGeneralIntelligence #DataScience
???????????????????? ?????? ? ?
NCR Chair & Prof; Founding Director, AI Institute at University of South Carolina
1 年Five years down the road, we will have learned that generative AI is just one more tool that works (and is a component) of solving some problems.
President LNS Research | Empowering COOs to transform safety, quality, sustainability, and productivity.
1 年Here's an important paper with solid references on what drove productivity growth and what didn't: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/transatlantic-technologies-why-did-ict-revolution-fail-boost-european-productivity The evidence is pointing towards outsourcing of electronics manufacturing to low cost manufacturing (that play book is played out) and the digitization of service industries (more room to grow here) But there has been markedly little growth in real productivity across the industrial sector... Tom Comstock Niels Erik Andersen Vivek Murugesan are leading project pathfinder for LNS Research to (hopefully) find the outlier companies that have found true step change improvements in productivity and what they did differently to achieve it!
Visionary Digital Transformation Thought Leader & Process Control Expert | Keynote Speaker | Moving Industry Forward by Optimizing Enterprise Human Capital, Automation, Data, and Measurement Capabilities
1 年I would like to offer a counter thought. I do not disagree with the point stated, I wonder if there are additional issues. The platue and even the decrease over the last 10 years is directly due to a change in human behavior. Ie. The pursuit of digital lead to a change in the application of the capital process. Historically capital funding was applied to improve productivity through engineering and operations. Over the last 10 years a huge portion of spending has been applied to continuos experimentation, primarily by personnel not directly associated with the leavers that drive productivity. So I offer a few drivers for consideration: 1. Change of responsibilities of personnel executing innovation projects. Many of the drivers of I4.0 have/had no connection with the production environment. This has lead to a longer startup curve in the generation of value. 2. Repetitive POC which did not lead to a growth in knowledge. 3. Relearning old lessons. In many cases IT based personnel working in the digital space, are simply learning well known technical knowledge from process control and automation. This effort again is preventing true growth of innovation. Ie we are using a lot of innovative tools to achieve the same results.
Helping Innovation Leaders start solving difficult problems with data-driven prototypes in only 4 days | Innovation Consultant
1 年Thanks Michael for this. With all the talk of AI possibilities, I appreciate you pointing out its limitations and the necessity for the human factor. Making investments in technologies AND investing in people!