Productising is raising the stakes
Many services businesses say they want to “productise”, i.e. to standardise what they do in order to be more profitable and scalable, and to increase shareholder value. Sadly, many struggle to make the journey. There are tough challenges in adopting a ‘product approach’, but I’m here to give you a blueprint for success. First let’s look at the problem:
Anyone who runs an agency or consultancy will recognise the term “utilisation”. It’s a measure of the proportion of time spent by “resources” (a dehumanising term for the people in your company who can do valuable stuff) on activities that directly generate revenue. There are only two scalars for a services business, utilisation and day rates. To grow you must sell more days and/or at a higher rate whilst keeping your costs under control.
It’s very tricky because your costs are primarily salaries, and unless you’re already large it’s easy to run into cashflow difficulties, with people sitting on their hands waiting for the next paying project to start. When the sales pipeline is lean, your sales qualification rules are quickly forgotten - you say “Yes” to anyone with a budget that arrives at your front door, because the painful alternative is laying people off. It’s only later you realise that by taking on the wrong client, you’ve stored up even more trouble.
It helps to look at this from the customer’s viewpoint. Consider this (sadly, all-too-common) customer journey. They:
The supplier in this scenario may well put this down to it being a ‘nightmare client’, but in my experience it’s usually their own fault. In contracts for the supply of specialist services, the client probably lacks the expertise to control and judge the quality of the delivery. They must trust the supplier not only to produce high quality results, but - crucially - to understand what was needed.
All too often, suppliers agree to deliver something the client has already defined (step 2 above), which is likely to be a poor choice given their lack of expertise. The supplier’s role is seen by the client as simply to execute a (probably poorly articulated) solution, and the supplier plays along because they need the revenue. It’s a low-value, transactional relationship, and unlikely to create the best outcome for anyone.
领英推荐
At some point in the growth of a services business somebody notices that there’s a good deal of repetition in the work done. Somebody suggests that they should ‘bottle’ this by defining standard procedures, perhaps embodying them in software (with AI, natch). The aim is that your people can focus on value-added activities specific to a client, whilst generating high profit margins by selling the same bottled content (i.e. a product) repeatedly.
The challenge here is to say “No” to revenue opportunities because they don’t fit your model, even though you have salary-earners waiting for something to do. It’s a form of investment, which means burning cash upfront with no guarantee that you’ll recoup it. Unless you have a healthy balance to start with and the nerve to hold to your strategy, it’s likely you’ll succumb to the temptation to say “Yes” to an ill-fitting prospect. There’s never any room left for your productisation goal, because you’re always too busy delivering yesterday’s promises.
It’s not easy, but I can give you a proven step-by-step process for breaking out of this. Here are my ten steps to productisation:
There’s a lot to unpack here, and I’ll be doing that in my upcoming articles.
Focused on ambitious projects with amazing people.
1 年Aidan Dunphy, nice article, I this see this a lot, that contradiction or balance between ambition and core business model. For me, your definition of a Solution Manager is absolutely spot on, and I say the most critical for any success in productising; I refer to them as Product Entrepreneurs, the driving force behind a product effort, combining the purpose, energy and practical hands to ensure success from the start.