Production line balancing Yes or No
Jo?o Leite
Engineering Manager, Program Manager, Tool & Die Expert +20 years experience in the ?? automotive industry
The “fundamentalists” of lean and the Toyota Production System are always defending line balancing.
?
Line balancing consists in balancing operator and machine time to match the production rate to the takt time.
?
Takt time is the rate at which parts or products must be produced in order to meet customer demand.
On a production line perfectly balanced the production time is exactly equal to takt time.
The production operations are rearranged to remove bottlenecks or excess capacity.
?
The benefits are supposed to be:
But
about 20 years ago I read the book "The Goal" from Eliyahu M. Goldratt and the theory of "statistical fluctuations".
Well I am an Engineer and as such I use mathematics to find answers and guarantees.
So I created an Excel file to do some mathematical simulations.
?Process assumptions:
?
Scenarios:
领英推荐
?
With ±2% hourly production rate variation
Balanced process does not achieve target daily production, during 220 days average, with an average deviation of -84 units per day.
With ±10% hourly production rate variation
Balanced process does not achieve target daily production, during 220 days average, with an average deviation of -398 units per day.
With ±20% hourly production rate variation
Balanced process does not achieve target daily production, during 220 days average, with an average deviation of -802 units per day.
Both remaining scenarios (increasing production rates and decreasing production rates) are always better than the balanced process.
The best end of the day WIP level is always attained by the increasing production rates process.
These calculations and simulations raise many doubts about one of the main lean concepts.