Product Story: Exploring Barriers to the 3Es in Meetings
In professional collaboration, the trifecta of Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Engagement, aptly summarized as the 3Es, stands as the cornerstone for successful meetings. Effectiveness ensures that our discussions translate into tangible outcomes; efficiency streamlines the process, optimizing the use of time and resources while engagement fosters a dynamic and participatory environment.
These three elements form an interconnected web, weaving the fabric of truly impactful meetings within the Iranian IT community and beyond. As we explore barriers within the meeting landscape, the focus remains on dismantling obstacles that hinder these vital 3Es.
I've always wanted to dedicate the first few lines of my articles to how I came up with the idea. Like everyone else in the Iranian IT community, I have thought about why it doesn't make us feel good to be in meetings, especially when we are in one.
Why is everything in the wrong place at this meeting? Why do we realize that nothing has changed when we enter the discussion and leave it? On the other hand …
There are meetings where we see many things change. Structures are improving, new teams are forming, and things are moving fast.
During the seven years I have been working in the Iranian IT community, I have had two experiences of attending meetings with different people.
Therefore, in this article, we want to focus on "barriers to productivity, effectiveness, and efficiency of meetings." Here, I thank my good friends who have shared their professional views with me based on their experiences:
Sadegh Hakimpanah, Mohsen Sayadian, Ali Babaei
The topic you mentioned is very interesting and I have thought about it a lot so far and I think about it in every meeting I go to. — Ali Babaei
People:
An essential part of any meeting is the people invited to the forum. People need to be selected correctly so that we can achieve the best results. The number of people is also significant. Based on the limited time of each session, we chose the number so that all of them could express their views.
They must be well-informed about the subject matter of the meeting, or, as the saying goes, "They must be relevant to the subject." The people in the meeting play a pivotal role. They will influence the engagement and its outcome and decisions; also, they will be affected by them. These people should also value the meeting to which they are invited. To fulfil their obligations (attending on time and being effective) at the conference.
Unfortunately, influential people and key decision-makers are sometimes not invited. As a result, the decision made is easily changed after the meetings because the main stakeholders were not correctly identified. Another problem is that instead of inviting relevant people, they ask people based on their organizational level, which has many negative consequences.
Time: In some organizational positions, the number of meetings per day is too much, and they only have enough time left for lunch and a cup of coffee. But in general, to consider the value of the time of all those present in the meeting and to have a valuable and practical meeting, it is necessary to limit the meeting time as possible while maintaining usefulness.
Unfortunately, meetings are not results-oriented, measurable, specific, regular, focused, and single-task. — Mohsen Sayadian
The meeting should start and end on time. It is okay to wait about one to two minutes for people to gather at the meeting place. After short greetings, it is better to start quickly working on the main topic. The session shouldn't begin with Irrelevant content. Unfortunately, starting the sessions with jokes, reminiscences, and other irrelevant content is one of the bad habits.
The duration of the session is good to be 40 minutes, but this time can vary depending on the topic and circumstances. But if you need more time, it is no longer a meeting but a working session. If you need to spend much time, there should be opportunities in between to relax and refresh. Otherwise, due to the tremendous pressure on the people present in the meeting, the meeting will no longer be applicable, and your valuable time will be well-spent.
In many cases, the time spent on meetings is not considered in the overall project time and costs. Long meeting times also cause people to focus on something other than the main topic.
Order: To maintain the correct framework for holding meetings, it is necessary that the meeting itself be well-organized and that some critical issues are observed.
Content: The content of a meeting is significant because it specifies who should be attending the conference. At the same time, it directly affects the time we have to devote to each session.
The first and most important thing that comes to my mind about the meeting are its subject and content. Is it a management meeting, decision making, consulting, product-related, reporting, etc.? I think each of these meetings can have a different format. -Sadegh Hakimpanah
Work experience with foreign companies (Mohsen Sayadian): I have worked with two foreign companies. The following items were indexed in them:
An organization with too many meetings is more likely to have problems with organizational culture (interaction and collaboration). - Sadegh Hakimpanah
Have you ever experienced these things?
What is your experience with meeting effectiveness and its barriers? Please share them with us in the comments section.
Feel free to comment below.